Thursday, January 15, 2009

Don't call me racist, Whitey

In honor of the great Sly Stone, I've titled this post "Don't call me racist, Whitey." Those who get the reference can enjoy. Those like Joe Cannon of the Racist Cannonfire can try Google and then pretend like they got it all along.

Joe Cannon, the Racist.

If you missed it, Joe Cannon launched an attack on me but mainly on affirmative action and he did a lot more. He made a real pig of himself online.

I couldn't believe it. Billie e-mailed C.I. about it and C.I. wrote this amazing thing for the snapshot today. It didn't go in because C.I. had it e-mailed to me first to make sure I was okay with it. I was. But I asked that it not go in the snapshot. I didn't want it to be at everyone's site if they didn't want it to be. (As would be the case in the snapshot because all the community sites repost the snapshot.) So I asked that C.I. use it for "I Hate The War" tonight. And we were on the phone on this and she said it wouldn't be a problem. I then asked if I could pull one aspect out of what she'd written?

She kindly said, "Stan, the attack was on you. You take any topic in there you want. My whole point is that I want it clear that I am calling out Cannon for attacking you." (I appreciate that.)

So what I wanted to grab was Affirmative Action. I told C.I. I wouldn't use all the legal cases and citations she did and she could still tackle it but she said, "It's your topic. You write on it. I have many other areas I can hit."

So here's what's going on.

Cannonfire. The crazy blog. I'm in Texas filling in for a few things along with Rebecca and Ruth (C.I. and the gang had to cancel everything because of Betty's move. Most of it could be rescheduled. Some of it could not be. Rebecca and Ruth said, "We'll fill in." I actually had time already scheduled off and was just going to sit around home for a week of vacation. I heard about Ruth and Rebecca and I said it sounded like fun. C.I. found out from my cousin and called me and said, "You can go. It's not a problem. Frequent flier miles will more than cover anything and I believe Ruth and Rebecca are going with suites so you can crash with them or I'll pick up your hotel expenses." I'm crashing with them (and Flyboy -- Rebecca's husband) (and Ruth's got her youngest grandson with her and Rebecca and Flyboy have their daughter with them).

So we had to do the the thing in Billie and Eddie's area today and Eddie asked me I wanted to check out his work in the morning and I could ride to the Iraq speaking gig this afternoon with him? That seemed like fun and I knew two other community members who worked in Eddie's building.

So we were at his work and he shows me what he generally does and then he says, "Break time!" What happens on break time? Check The Common Ills to see if C.I.'s done some bonus. (It happens, it's rare, but it happens.) Nope. Okay, quick run through the blogs. And we get to Cannonfire (which Eddie checks out) and I'm like, "What the . . .?"

There's this slam on Senator Roland Burris and how he played the race card and boo-hoo and people are racist (according to Joe Cannon) because they said Barack's seat should be filled by a Black man.

So I leave a comment and I get a lot of "f[] you"s and get called a racist. By Whitey Joe.

First, Whitey, I did not say Barack was Black.

I am Black. I use the term African-American.

But I am Black. Therefore, unlike Whitey Joe, I know what Black is. Barack is not Black and only racists call him that. What he's called -- even by admirers -- in the Black community in conversations is "mixed." He's mixed. He's half-White and he's half-Black. I wouldn't call him Black. I have never called him Black. If I did, Betty would beat me senseless. In this community, Betty (who is Black) has made it clear since early in 2007, do not call Barack Black because he's not. Her kids, in 2007, could see that just seeing him on TV. Her kids are Black.

I called Barack a person of color. He is that.

And I am a racist because I stated that his seat should be filled by a person of color.

Now how many people are in the US Senate who are Black? One. Senator Roland Burris who was seated today.

How many senators are there? 100.

So 99 senators are not Black. So Black America is represented in the US Senate on a 1/100 scale. White America needs over 90% of the Senate?

Affirmative Action is being attacked as much as I am.

Roland Burris is qualified to be a Senator. He's held multiple elected offices, he's won statewide elections in Illinois (such as Attorney General). He is a practicing attorney. He has not been found lacking. He is qualified.

But it's important for Joe Cannon and others to strip that away and scream, "Racism!"

The seat should have been held for a qualified person of color.

They don't like the idea of "qualified."

Affirmative Action threatens people like Joe Cannon, the middle aged (pushing elderly) White man who sees any advances by Blacks as a huge threat. See, one senator out of 100 being Black -- that's just too scary for Joe Cannon. He's banging his head against the wall screaming, "They taking over! They taking over!"

Like many a conservative, Joe Cannon wants to do away with Affirmative Action. He thinks we've progressed as a society far enough already.

And as proof that we have, apparently, he needs to kick Roland Burris out of the Senate because one Black senator is just more progress than Racist Joe Cannon can handle.

(Thank you to those who e-mailed about trying to defend me at Cannon's site. He refused to waive your comments through. Keesha, I think you were the first to e-mail but you weren't the only ones. As a result of that crap, if he tries to leave a comment here, I will delete it. He doesn't spit on my Black brothers and sisters and then think he has a right to show up here. He can delete my comment from his blog if he wants.)

Also thanks to those of you who have forwarded the e-mails he's sent out. I will note that if this is how PUMA thinks it's appropriate to talk to women, take me off PUMA. If screaming "f[] you" and everything else at women who write and -- in one case -- just say, "You need to apologize to Stan," is how PUMA thinks you treat women, that's appalling and I want no part of PUMA. I see you forwarded them to me and to C.I. and she may grab that so I'll stop here except to note that maybe it's not all women that get treated that way? Maybe this is just how he treats Black women?

Affirmative Action addresses discrimination. It is a redress. What does C.I. always say? "Systemic discrimination." It is a system of discrimination and therefore it needs a legal program to address it. The Senate did not get any Black senators until Reconstruction and then those were from Southern states which were under US control. (The Union was the US. That became obvious when the Confederacy lost. Sorry if that's news to Joe Cannon who probably has a rebel flag tattoed on his big, old White ass.)

In Iraq, they are holding provincial elections January 31st. And to ensure equal representation, some seats are being held for certain groups (ethnic groups, religious minorities and women -- though all three have been screwed over and are not getting what the law originally promised). You do that to ensure equal representation.

To advocate that a person of color replace the only mainland Senator of color (Hawaii has two senators of color) is not racism. Nor did I ever say, "It has to be Black because Barack is Black!" Barack's not Black. Equally true is my cousin Marcia has been at the forefront of calling for David Paterson, New York's first Black governor, to consider appointing a person of color to Hillary's seat should be confirmed as Secretary of State.

We do not have a Senate that looks like America. There is no reason that governors making appointments cannot do their part to fix that.

But conservatives like Joe Cannon hate Affirmative Action. (He would say he's not a conservative. He is. And he's a reactionary.) So they attack it and they insist that if you hold a seat or space for anyone of color or for women (who are historically discriminated against as a class also), you're just shoving someone in there. Not true. There are many people of color, there are many White women and women of color, with the experience and record to demonstrate that they can be strong senators.

I feel every governor replacing a senator by appointment should be doing so in a way that makes the Senate look more reflective of America.

There are qualified people and Affirmative Action allows those qualified people who have historically been held back to finally be seated at the table.

For Joe Cannon, that's racism.

For his crowd (I know Marcia's going to go off on one woman), that's racism.

No, it's about equality. It's about writing a wrong. It's about restoring balance.

But when you're a reactionary conservative, you don't care about balance. You don't care about any non-Whites in your country.

Take your hatred somewhere else Joe Cannon. Or let it die with you. If it's the latter, I hope for the sake of humanity, that burial comes soon.

Who did I mention? Rebecca of Sex and Politics and Screeds and Attitude, Betty of Thomas Friedman Is a Great Man, C.I. of The Common Ills and The Third Estate Sunday Review, Ruth of Ruth's Report, and my cousin Marcia of SICKOFITRDLZ (and you know you want to check out what she has to say tonight).

Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"

Thursday, January 15, 2009. Chaos and violence continue, a new Pentagon report notes that the Iraqi military is a shambles, Ryan Crocker receives an award, Bumiller and Shanker continue to report realities on 'withdrawal,' Ms. magazine's continued efforts to self-embarrass and more.

First off, I know about
Stan being trashed by a racist. It will be dealt with tonight. I dictated a long section on it and on the pig's White entitlement but Stan's the one who got trashed and I wanted him to see it first before it went up. (It's always cute when a White person already known online as a racist decides to call an African-American racist.) That section was e-mailed to him and he said use it for the Thursday's "I Hate The War." I will and I will expand it. But I know that people are angry -- it will be addressed.

Today
Elisabeth Bumiller and Thom Shanker (New York Times) report on the US military commanders contingency plan for Iraq. Last month Bumiller and Shanker reported on the military commanders presenting a partial drawdown of US troops in Iraq on a slower scale than Barack's 'pledge' of 16 month withdrawal (of "combat" troops only). No objections were raised over the timeframe by the president-elect but, in case objections are registered in the immediate future, they've come up with an alternate plan they could implement. This calls for a high of 8,000 a month (more likely four to six thousand) to be pulled. Using the high figure, 48,000 US service members could be out of Iraq (with at least 30,000 of that number redeployed to Afghanistan) in six months. That would still leave close to 100,000 US troops in Iraq. And there is no full withdrawal planned by Barack. That is why he refused to promise that, if elected, all US troops would be out of Iraq by the end of his first term (2012). Of course, Barack also rushed to assure the Times (2007) that he would easily halt any drawdown and rush more troops back into Iraq (and no words to declare this a temporary measure) when he sat down with Michael Gordon and Jeff Zeleny (see this Iraq snapshot and Third's article and the actual transcript of the interview -- a transcript Tom Hayden should have read before humiliating himself in public, then again Tom-Tom seems to enjoy public humiliation). So the article tells you that the military's preparing for all possibilities . . . except the possibility the American people want (and some foolishly believe Barack ever promised) full withdrawal of Iraq. That is not an option the military even considers. And the report is backed up by the statements Pentagon spokesperson Goeff Morrell made today, "Our military planners do not live in a vacuum. They are well aware that the president-elect has campaigned on withdrawing troops from Iraq on a 16-month timeline. . . . So it would only be prudent of them to draw up plans that reflect that option. But that is just one of the options that they are drawing up." The article bears noting for two additional details. First, as Barack seems determined to make Afghanistan his own personal quagmire, let no one deny alarms were raised ahead of his swearing in:

Even as Mr. Obama prepares for the drawdown in Iraq, some influential Democrats and national security experts have begun voicing concern about his willingness to send up to 30,000 additional American troops to Afghanistan, where the United States has been at war for more than seven years. They say that Mr. Obama has yet to make clear his overall goals beyond calling for more forces, money and diplomacy in an increasingly violent, ungovernable country that the military says presents even more problems than Iraq.


Second, after noting what the Status Of Forces Agreement could do, Bumiller and Shanker include the reality: "That agreement, however, can be renegotiated." That's reporting (and this was the report referred to in
yesterday's snapshot, FYI). (And so was Bumiller's December report on how the military hopes to fudge troop withdrawals by terminology.) The Status Of Forces Agreement (which al-Maliki calls "The Withdrawal Agreement" when visiting Iran) was one of two agreements. The other was the Strategic Framework Agreement. Vice president-elect Joe Biden left the Senate today. April 10th, as chair of the Committee on Foreign Relations, Biden explained the two agreements:

We will hear today about the two agreements that the Administration is negotiating with Iraq which were anticipated in the November Declaration. On Tuesday, Ambassador Crocker told us that these agreements would set forth the "vision" -- his phrase -- of our bilateral relationship with Iraq. One agreement is a "strategic framework agreement" that will include the economic, political and security issues outlined in the Declaration of Principles. The document might be better titled "What the United States will do for Iraq," because it consists mostly of a series of promises that flow in one direction -- promises by the United States to a sectarian government that has thus far failed to reach the political compromises necessary to have a stable country. We're told that the reason why we're not continuing under the UN umbrella is because the Iraqis say they have a sovereign country. But they don't want a Status of Forces Agreement because that flows two ways. The Administration tells us it's not binding, but the Iraqi parliament is going to think it is. The second agreement is what Administration officials call a "standard" Status of Forces Agreement, which will govern the presence of U.S. forces in Iraq, including their entry into the country and the immunities to be granted to them under Iraqi law. Unlike most SOFAs, however, it would permit U.S. forces -- for the purposes of Iraqi law -- to engage in combat operations and detain insurgents. In other words, to detain people that we think are bad guys. I don't know any of the other nearly 90 Status of Forces Agreements that would allow a U.S. commander to arrest anyone he believes is a bad guy.

We're focusing on the Strategic Framework Agreement, or as Biden put it, "What the United States will do for Iraq." The
US Embassy in Baghdad notes that the agreement was the topic of "the inauguaral January 13, 2009 meeting of the Iraqi-U.S. Higher Coordination Committee" which found puppet Nouri al-Maliki and US Secretary of State Condi Rice co-chairing the meeting with participants Hoshyar Zebari (Foreign Minister) , Barham Saleh and Rafi Essawi (Deputy Prime Ministers), Jawad al-Bolani (Interior Minister), Abdul-Qadir Muhammad Jasim (Minster of Defense), Mowaffak Al-Rubaie (National Security Advisor), Sadig Al-Rikabi (Political Advisor) and on the US side Henrietta Fore (USAID Aministrator), Dave McCormick (Under Secretary of the Treasury), Eric Edelman (Under Secretary of Defense for Policy), Ryan Crocker (US Ambassador to Iraq) and Gen Ray Odierno (top US commander in Iraq). Anyone see a problem?

Where's James L. Jones Jr.?

That's Barack pick for National Security Advisor. Some will argue that, with Condi participating, Hillary Clinton should have been brought in. While it's unheard of for the Senate to fail to confirm one of their own, it could happen. With Hillary or anyone else. So there are some people that it made no sense to invite since they do not have that posts yet. However, NSA is not a post that requires Senate confirmation. James L. Jones was selected by Barack and announced by Barack. That means he is the National Security Advisor. His Iraq counterpart was participating, why wasn't Jones brought in?

The US Embassy in Baghdad announces: "The meeting formally launched the Strategic Framework Agreement process, which will guid U.S. - Iraqi relations. Secretary Rice and Prime Minister Al-Maliki reaffirmed their strong desire to establish a long-term relationship of cooperation and friendship, based on the principle of equality." And how did they do that? How did Condi Rice -- who is out of a job next week -- reaffirm anything long-term for the US? Jones should have been brought into that meeting and for those who want to offer excuses about travel to Baghdad, Condi Rice was not in Iraq January 13th. She was in DC. We'll get to what else she was doing but she and Hernietta Fore were in DC pariticipating via tele-conference. The outgoing administration should have made a point to invite James Jones who will be -- no doubts, no confirmation from the Senate needed -- the next National Security Advisor and will be done transitioning and in that job in less than a week.

If you're conveying longterm relationship, how do you do that with the outgoing administration. For that matter, Robert Gates could have participated in the meeting. (And his Iraqi counterpart did.) Gates is Secretary of Defense and Barack's made him his designate for Sec of Defense. As the only link between the outgoing administration and the incoming one, why wasn't he voted in. Before we go to what Gates did Tuesday, today the Bully Boy of the United States presented a Medal of Freedom to US Ambassador Crocker. Among those attending the White House ceremony (Crocker was in DC for the ceremony) were Condi Rice, First Lady Laura Bush and John Negroponte. Among Bully Boy's remarks were recounting some of Crocker's history of service:

Members of the Foreign Service bring this valor and professionalism to their work every single day. And there is one man who embodies these qualities above all: Ambassador Ryan Crocker. Over the years, Ryan has earned many honors, including the Presidential Meritorious Service Award and the rank of Career Ambassador. Today I have the privilege of honoring Ambassador Crocker with the highest civil award I can bestow: the Presidential Medal of Freedom. It has not been bestowed yet. The son of an Air Force officer, Ryan Crocker has never been your typical diplomat. For social engagements, he likes to tell guests, "no socks required." For language training, he once spent time herding sheep with a desert tribe in Jordan. For sport, he has jogged through war zones, and run marathons on four continents. And for assignments, his preference has always been anywhere but Washington. During his nearly four decades in the Foreign Service, Ryan Crocker has become known as America's Lawrence of Arabia. His career has taken him to every corner of the Middle East. His understanding of the region is unmatched. His exploits are legendary. He has served as ambassador to five countries. He has repeatedly taken on the most challenging assignments. The man has never run from danger. As a young officer during the late 1970s, Ryan catalogued Saddam Hussein's murderous rise to power. In 1983, he survived the terrorist attack on the American embassy in Lebanon. In 1998, as the Ambassador to Syria, he witnessed an angry mob plunder his residence. After any one of these brushes with danger, most people would have lost their appetite for adventure. Not Ryan Crocker. In the years since September the 11th, 2001, I have asked Ryan to hold numerous posts on the front lines of the war on terror, and he has stepped forward enthusiastically every time.

Dana Perino noted in today's White House press briefing, "It was a surprise for Ryan Crocker, that he was getting the Presidential Medal of Freedom -- a surprise, I think, for everybody. But we kept that a secret because he is a very humble person, Ambassador Crocker. And I can't think of anybody more deserving. And I think that it was a fitting tribute to the Foreign Service Officers that the President has put in posts that usually go to political appointees, that something as important as Iraq and Afghanistan, especially in Iraq when it came to having leadership there, especially during those dark days, which I'll get to in a moment, Abassador Crocker was definitely one of the best leaders. And for some of the younger people there, the younger career Foreign Service Officers, I think it was really good for them to see that hard work can be rewarded, and by a President who is very grateful for all that the Foreign Service has done under his watch and that they'll continue to do there. They're consummate professionals. I've had the pleasure of getting to know a lot of them."

Now back to Robert Gates. Gates joined Rice, Fore and State Dept Counselor Eliot Cohen in the US State Dept's treaty room Tuesday (the 13th) for
a signing ceremony (link has text and video). What were they signing? Don't rush. War Hawk, Neocon and PNAC-er Cohen gave big butt smooches to Gates and Rice and then Rice offered this frightening thought, "I suspect that that means that there are two American universities that may be teaching from this manual." The manual? The counterinsurgency doctrine. Yes, the Pentagon has long practiced that abuse of human rights but Rice is on board as well and they were signing the counterinsurgency guide as well. (The two universities are the ones that gave Gates and Rices their doctorates -- Georgetown and the University of Denver's Josef Korbel School of International Studies respectively.)
Counter-isnurgency is war on a native people. The last eight years have seen anthropologists, psychologists and psychiatrists betray their fields and training to provide 'skills' on how to defeat a native people. Rice declared, "And this counterinsurgency doctrine and this manual really is a compilation of the experiences that we have had in learning how to fight together, how to work together, and ultimately how to deliver for people defense, democracy and development." Gates added, "I'm honored to sign the Interagency Counterinsurgency Guide today and demonstrate my support for whole-of-government counterinsurgency process. Military efforts alone are rarely effective in counterinsurgency operations. This guide reflects strong efforts by many organizations and individuals to build the soft power capabilities and the coordinating processes within the United States Government that are so central to our counterinsurgency efforts." And if you could read the above without losing your lunch, Fore seemed determined to ensure that your hurled:

And let me add for my two secretaries that it is very important for us in the world of development to have a guide such as this. It's a very complex and challenging area – the work of counterinsurgency. We in development will particularly focus on helping host country governments how they can deal with good governance while having an atmosphere of counterinsurgency. It is very challenging, but country ownership and legitimacy of a government, as well as continuing good governance and democratic reforms, are a very important and integral part. And we will add our highest accolade in that we will use this guide in the field.

That's Henrietta Fore who will thankfully be out of USAID shortly. Condi got off a joke and we'll note it here, "And now to my good friend, Bob Gates. And not only are we both Ph.D.s and former high-ranking university administrators, but we both studied the Soviet Union, which, in case you don't know, no longer exists. And it means that found useful work after that." Some would question whethere the employment was useful to the world.

Counter-insurgency is digusting, vile and goes against democracy. Fortunately, since Hillary Clinton will likely be Sec of State, all the Barack groupies posing as 'independent' journalists can call out the State Dept support for counter-insurgency, right? They can just pretend -- as they did throughout 2007 and 2008 -- that the counter-insurgency 'noteables' were all supporting and advising Barack -- such as Sarah Sewall, Samantha Power and, oh, so many more.

In Iraqi election news,
John J. Kruzel (Australia TO) reports US Maj Gen Michael Oates is voicing concerns ahead of the January 31st provincial elections: "What's important to Iraq is that elections be seen as credible, and my only concern is that outside influences may interfere." Elections are schedueled to be held in 14 of Iraq's 18 provinces. AP reports that groups competing in Mosul are asking for "more government protection for polling stations in Kurdish-controlled areas" and they quote Habda's Athil al-Nujeifi stating that Sunni and Shi'ite groups are asking for the protection (al-Nujeifi is Sunni), "We have bitter experience from last elections when members of the peshmerga (Kurdish fighters) took advantage of the situation and committed fraud in order to boost the position of their two parties in the elections. Our current demand aims at preventing any new violations that would repeat the old scenario."

Turning to Iraqi 'justice.' From the
December 10, 2007 snapshot:Among the deaths reported in Iraq over the weekend, one has gotten more attention that most murdered Iraqis receive. Yesterday, Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reported on the continued targeting of officials and the roadside bombing in Hilla which claimed the life of the Babil province's police chief Brig. Gen. Qais Al Mamouri (two other people also died in the bombing). Adrian Croft (Reuters) noted that there have been multiple attempts on Mamouri's life over the years and quotes a historian specializing in Iraq's history, Reidar Visser, declaring, "For several years, Mamouri stood out as an honest figure of authority in the mixed governorate of Babel, and had fought hard against militias regardless of their sectarian affilaitons." In this morning's New York Times, Paul von Zielbauer noted this "assassination of the police chief, Brig. Gen Qais al-Mamori, who led the police forces in Babil Province, was the latest of several attacks against provincial leaders in the mainly Shiite Arab region in recent months. General Mamori, who was 48, had become known for cracking down on militia leaders. He and the two bodygruads were killed as their police convoy rolled past a gas station in Hilla, the provincial capital, a local police official said. The leader of the provincial council's security committee, Hassan Watwet, said an investigation into Sunday's explosion was under way." von Zielbauer also noted that Muhammad Ali al-Hassani and Khalil Jalil Hamza -- governors of the Muthanna Province and the Qadisiya Province respectively, were assassinated several months ago "in what appeared to be a power struggle among rival Shiite militias for control of the oil-rich region." CBS and AP note: "The death of Brig. Gen. Qais al-Maamouri, chief of Babil's provincial capital of Hillah, was the latest in a series of assassinations of provincial leaders in the mainly Shiite region. Hundreds marched along dusty roads in Babil to mourn al-Maamouri, chanting and firing guns into the air."
Ned Parker (Los Angeles Times) speaks with Aais al-Mamouri's brother Safaa who explains that all this time later, there has been no justice. He explains how a September trial went nowhere when the judge asked to be excused. Safaa says, "The political sides intimidated the judge and made him leave the case. Maybe it was a political party that has power in the government and intimidated the judge, or a side that had militias." Still no trial. The case was moved to Baghdad's criminal court and the day for the trial to start has came and went with no trial.

No justice in Iraq. Moving to contractors.
Walter Pincus (Washington Post) reported yesterday, "A $722 million contract to rebuild Iraq's oil and gas production facilities was marked by multiple changes, cost overruns, failure to meet schedules and lack of oversight, according to a new inspector general's report." The corporation responsible? KBR. Meanwhile World Tribune reports a new "Defense Department report said less than 10 percent of Iraq Army battalions were capable of planning and executing counter-insurgency operations. The rest of the army combat battalions required anywhere from partial to significant support from the U.S. military and it's coalition partners." The report is entitled "Measuring Stability and Security in Iraq" and it was released January 13th (it's dated January 9th -- PDF format warning, click here). You can file this under "conditions on the ground" most likely. "Conditions on the ground," Barack has stated repeatedly, would determine withdrawal rate for "combat" troops. Conditions, the report informs, are not good. And the news is far worse than the report indicates. For example, page 1 (page 11 on your screen) includes this bit of rah-rah on 'progress': "The November 3, 2008 passage of an amendment to the PEL establishing set-asides for religious minorities on three provincial councils marks a positive step towards ensuring minority representation in Iraq's political institutions." Oh really? Does the Pentagon think no one pays attention to Iraq?

That "postive step" reduced the number of set-asides for religious minorities (which led to protests throughout Iraq and that may have in turn led to the attack on Christians in Mosul). Article 50 was the provision that allowed for minority representation in Iraq. The Parliament kicked it out -- with little attention from the public or the press -- arguing that a national census had never taken place. al-Maliki didn't know how the set-asides had been eliminated but they'd be restored! They were not restored. Even with Iraqi President Jalal Talabani swearing that they would be. With Article 50 dropped, an add-on was create which gave a smaller number of seats than Article 50 promised. Not just the Vatican but the Pope himself called that out. And the report wants to paint that as a sign of progress?

The entire report is a joke and it's difficult to find a section passed off as 'progress' that closer examination reveals none. On a similar note,
Ernesto London (Washington Post) reported Monday, "Tens of thousands of U.S. troops in Iraq started the year calibrating their missions to conform with a new security agreement that demands that American combat troops depend more heavily than efver on their often-bungling Iraqi counterparts. Sometimes that means dragging one or two along on patrol." Which is more than backed up by the Pentagon's own report.

Meanwhile
Leila Fadel (Kansas City Star -- billed that way because if you don't put in on the company's Iraq page -- created to drive traffic -- you don't get credit) reports that some Palestinians find Iraq's statements in support of the Palestinians under assault in Gaza hypocritcal. Who are these Palestinians? The ones in Iraq: "Banned from holding Iraqi citizenship, even if they were born here, Palestinians lost some of the few rights they had after the U.S.-led invasion in 2003 and have lived in fear of Iraqi groups who seek revenge for the Palestinians' perceived connection to the old regime." The figures have dropped from 34,000 in Iraq to 10,000 not counting the 3,000 imprisoned in the camps on the Syrian border.
Turning to some of today's reported violence . . .

Bombings?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports a Baghdad roasdie bombing that wounded two people, a second one that wounded four and a third one that targeted Ahmed Taieb Murad and claimed the life of Murad's bodyguard Reuters identifies the Education Minister targeted in the Baghdad roadside bombing as Abd Thiab al-Ajili.

Shootings?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 police officer shot dead in Mosul yesterday.

Corpses?

Mohammed Al Dulaimy (McClatchy Newspapers) reports 1 corpse discovered in Nineveh Province yesterday.

In US political news, Ms. magazine can't stop lying. Reality: Ms. is having huge subscription problems. Today on CNN, Kathy Spillar tried to defend the cover that can't be defended while paired off against
The New Agenda's Amy Siskind. At the end of the report, CNN's Jason Carroll stated Ms. asserts that subscriptions are up. LIE. Bold faced lie. As with every other periodical in the country, Ms. is suffering due to the economy. Since posting their upcoming cover, Ms. has had a record number of cancellations and, if we want to be really honest, Ms. tanked in 2008 before the economy did. Jason Carroll offers Ms.' 'logic' in this statment: "The magazine says it's the right cover saying it's the right time to showcase a man like Obama who identifies himself as a feminist." Stop. Just stop.

Produce the statment Barack Obama ever made where he stated he identifies as a feminist. Now maybe when he was trying to woo Hyde Park over a decade ago, he made some such statement but he's not made it since stepping onto the national stage.

"The problem with the cover is it's a man standing in a Superman pose and, thank you, but the women of this country can stand up for themselves," Amy Siskind states. That's one problem.

There's another. The cover's a lie. It's already been explored at length how Barack uses sexism 'periodically' when he's 'feeling blue' and 'the claws come out' (if you're not familiar,
click here for Violet Socks detailing it). But that's the least of it.

The cover is a lie because it's not a real photo. It's a photo-shopped cover -- and not photo-shopped for humor which puts Ms. on the same sewer level as The National Enquirer. There are people who will see it and think Barack posed for it. That's called LYING. That's called DECEIVING. Ms. needs to make it very clear that they have doctored a photo of Barack. They could have taken an undoctored photo, run it on the cover and offered the headline "This is what feminism looks like." It would still have caused problems but the cover wouldn't have deceived people. Many will honestly believe this is a photo Barack posed for and that he wore that t-shirt. It's a LIE. And the cover's a LIE. Whoopi Goldberg, Janeane Garofalo, Ashley Judd and countless others have been more than happy to put those t-shirts on and pose for Ms. in them. The fact that Barack didn't proves he's not a feminist. But the cover's a lie because it's photo shopped and people assume it's true. It's a lie because Ms. has used similar photos on the cover (Janeane with the bullhorn) and in their get-the-word-out (they don't like to call it "marketing") on the magazine. So Ms. readers have a right to expect that when they see someone in that t-shirt in or on Ms., the person posed for the photo. If you're not getting it,
check out the spring 2003 cover where Ashley, Margaret Cho, Whoopi and Cameryn Manheim are all featured wearing t-shirts with that slogan. Those are photos they posed for. Most people don't read Ms. For obvious reasons these days. So they're not getting how offensive it is that Barack's in that t-shirt in a photo shopped photo. Ms. set out to fool readers. That's offensive.

Kathy Spillar's brought on (by Ms.) to dispel myths. Yes, she is a White woman. However, she is not of the Seven Sisters -- a point immediately apparent when she opens her mouth. Spillar graduated from Texas Christian University.
Julie Menin explains, "There is still some concern from some women's groups about President-elect Obama. And, specifically, some of the concerns they have are that there have not been that many women appointed to his cabinet." Kathy Spillar ignores that. Spizer has no response to that. She's probably busy humming her alma mata's theme song ("Fight on boys, fight, with all your might/ Roll up the scores for TCU/ Hail white and purple flag whose heroes never lag/ Horned Frog, we are all for you!" -- maybe Ms. can hail that as a feminist song!).

The sad thing that no one's supposed to notice is that Ms. not only has run off readers (starting before this cover), they're not even a real magazine anymore. They started out as a monthly magazine. They can't even hack it as a bi-monthly. Going advertising free was supposed to 'free' Ms. And it quickly dropped from bi-monthly to quarterly. It again takes ads. Its got less and less content. The only thing that always excited readers were the letters and they now edit the letters and only offer snippets. The magazine is a complete and utter failure that should either shut down immediately or fire all on staff and reboot.

But Kathy Spillar wants to go on CNN and declare Ms. a success. Keep dreaming, Kath. [
Heidi Li offers her take here.]

And keep dreaming that those who choose to honor homphobes can ever be feminists. They can't.
Sunsara Taylor (World Can't Wait) takes on Barack's homophobic friend Rick Warren:

When Barack Obama invited Rick Warren, pastor of Saddleback mega-church and author of The Purpose Driven Life, to deliver the invocation at his inauguration, some raised their voices in protest. But all too many told people to just calm down, drink the Obama'Laid of "common ground," and reach out their arms to this pastor who is nothing more than a Christian fascist in a Hawaiian shirt.

Rick Warren is no "moderate" and he is not progressive. He may be the "new face" of evangelicalism, but he doesn't represent a new content.

Taylor goes on to list the problems. 1) Biblical literalist. 2) Wants to criminalize being gay. 3) Insists women are subordinate. 4) Denies evolution. 5) His AIDS work in Uganda is a joke and damaging to healthcare and preventing AIDS to begin with. Sunsara concludes:

Stop drinking the Obama'Laid! The "common ground" being brokered by Obama is doing nothing to bring Rick Warren and his ilk closer to the interests of humanity. Rather, this "common ground" approach is about legitimating and normalizing Warren's deadly religious bigotry. Standing on this "common ground" is leading progressive people who genuinely care about women, gays, science, and AIDS in Africa to capitulate, to give up principle, and to accept things that they never would've accepted from someone like Pat Robertson or George Bush.

The fact that Rick Warren is the best that Obama can come up with to speak about "purpose" and "morality" reveals the utter moral and ideological bankruptcy of not only him, but the whole imperialist system he represents. Time is up. Humanity needs liberation and we need morality and purpose that correspond to that; to overcoming grinding poverty and exploitation, establishing equality and mutual respect between men and women, ending racism and national oppression throughout the world, fostering critical thinking and science among all people, and unleashing art and the imagination unshackled from religious ignorance and superstition. This is communist morality and revolutionary purpose, the exact opposition of compromise and conciliation.

And despite Melissa Etheridge making a fool of herself to vouch for Rick Warren, he's a HOMOPHOBE. And
Hillary Is 44 explains he's helping with the attacks on the LGBT community in the Episcopalian Church and sending out 'soldiarity letters': "We stand in solidarity with them, and with all orthodox, evangelical Anglicans. I offer the campus of Saddleback Church to any Anglican congregation who need a place to meet, or if you want to plant a new congregation in south Orange County" Golly, Melissa, looks like you really are "the only one" -- and not in a good way.


Highlighting these community posts: Rebecca's "
'que sera, sera'," Marcia's "Ms. Jackson, because you know you're nasty," Betty's "Outkast," Trina's "The Singing Nun," Ruth's "Fats Domino and the Drifters," Stan's "From En Vouge to Luther Vandross," Elaine's "'I Want To Hold Your Hand'," Kat's "Isley's for my first," Mike's "Harriet Miers, Monica, etc.," Cedric's "I guess any crook can be Secretary of the Treasury" and Wally's "THIS JUST IN! HE CAN MANAGE THE TREASURY?????".


iraq
the new york timeselisabeth bumillerthom shanker
the los angeles timesned parkermcclatchy newspapersmohammed al dulaimy
the new york times
paul von zielbauercbs news
the washington postwalter pincus
ernesto londono
like maria said pazkats kornersex and politics and screeds and attitudethomas friedman is a great mantrinas kitchenthe daily jotcedrics big mixmikey likes itruths reportsickofitradlzoh boy it never ends
leila fadel

15 comments:

Keesha said...

I loved the post. And I tried to leave a comment defending you at Joe Cannon's trash/sewer site but he refused to post it.

Kayvette said...

I got the Sly Stone song right off. You know what's most disgusting? There are people who think Joe Cannon is "progressive" and "liberal."

Lewis said...

Joe Cannon's just another scared baby wanting to destroy affirmative action and chances for equality. You nailed it.

LaDonna said...

Keesha beat me! I thought I was going to be first.
Joe Cannon's sick.

Anonymous said...

Joe cannon is the kkk grand dragon

KeShawn said...

Joe Cannon's ego may be larger than his racism.

Loretta said...

Cannon is a screaming lunatic. Black people are not welcome at his site and that's long been obvious.

Anonymous said...

Joe cannon sniffs poop.

Terry said...

Did you hear what Joe Cannon said today?
No?
No one else did either.
No one will waste their time on him again.

Miguel said...

Support you, Stan. 100%

Demitrica said...

Someday Joe Cannon will die and the world will be a better place.

Anonymous said...

Joe cannon eats poop. But only white poop.

Fred said...

I agree with what Betty wrote last night, Joe Cannon is trying to steal your joy. Don't let him do that, Stan.
Just remember, it's all him now.
We know who he is and what he is.

Anonymous said...

Joe cannon is poop

Anonymous said...

[p]Some type thomas sabo armband with charms is usually a special and desirable bit of jewellery . Thomas Sabo [url=http://www.llinksoflondon.co.uk]wholesale links of london[/url] is a huge collection, including collection of Thomas Sabo Jewellery packages . Your children can produce their very own person style at the same timeOne unique place of charms is known as the kids club These are for young kids and tweensThey also have a very kind of cleansers and Thomas Sabo Pendants that job utilising the sonic plan The truth this vibrates so as to a great deal more than 3 hundred actions for every 2nd assurance an individual how the item will it truly is do Clarisonic Plus the job nicely The entire procedure ought to acquire round one minute and your skin have to sense easy, thoroughly clean although not dry . com, charmvip4u . Adult females will be able to possess some of expensive jewelry that contain bracelets which means that a product only to the, that gold is known as a sizzling hot company name on expensive [url=http://www.thomassabojewellerysuk.co.uk]thomas sabo jewellery[/url] jewelry, in addition to being always conceivable purchasing a truly cost effective adaptation . It is certainly clear that all peace for jewellery involving the genuine brand thomas sabo onlineshop is with the multitude of the different vision for its game makers, reverence that will tradition together with an good sense within the current trends and even future developments in fashion . As they are designed in different styles, you can easily find one or several for different occasions . Their greatest need with regards [url=http://www.llinksoflondon.co.uk]links london charms[/url] to high-quality and aesthetics meet the unsurpassed good quality and style provided by them . About the Pandora jewelry, you will easily find there are countless designs and styles for choosing on today隆炉s fashion jewelry market.[/p][p]Then measure the bracelet [url=http://www.thomassabojewellerysuk.co.uk]thomas sabo sale[/url] extender chain to make sure it is long enough . About the numbers and order of both rhinestone beads alloy beads are depend on you . Not only because they are expensive, but because this line of jewelry has a wonderful history . Then string all the rest jewelry beads and findings on wire by the order like simple . Anyone want to require exactly why WE decide on my necklaces, Let me clarify the item to you personally . Specifically hence unbelievable plus unconventional concerning elegance wristbands is you will enjoy an possibility to purchase and choose your special personal charms becoming strapped onto a bracelet of this liking . Pandora Jewelry is quite unique and the line does not only include [url=http://www.thomassabojewellerysuk.co.uk]thomas sabo jewellery sale[/url] bracelets and necklaces . Wear an oversized fashion cheap bracelet, you will [url=http://www.thomassabojewellerysuk.co.uk]cheap thomas sabo jewellery[/url] be fashion and unique.[/p]