Elvira e-mailed that, "Actually, I would watch anything over a WHO'S THE BOSS reboot. I can't think of a more useless show from the 80s and I remember WE'VE GOT IT MADE."
Wednesday, August 5, 2020. Iraq War veteran Sean Worsely continues
to be persecuted by the State of Alabama, Iraq's prime minister faces
many problems -- including whether he can rule.
Veteran Sean Worsley stopped for gas in Gordo, Alabama to pump gas for
his wife on a family road trip to his grandmother’s house. While pumping
gas he was laughing and playing air guitar. He was approached by Gordo
PD for violating a noise ordinance with his music, and the events that
unfolded from there would change his life forever.
And here is Eboni Worsley, Sean's wife, speaking about the case and Sean joins her on the phone in this video.
Four
drive-by e-mails (non-community members e-mailing the public account)
who insist they are attorneys want it known that I am completely wrong
when I say this needs to be challenged in regards to medical.
Can I be completely wrong? Absolutley. And I probably am many times. I don't think I'm wrong on this.
Sean's
facing prison because he was going through Alabama and he and his wife
were stopped and he had marijuana. The marijuana was prescribed, he had
his medical prescription. Alabama does not prescribe medical
marijuana. Not only was his medication confiscated but he was arrested.
I
am on, among other things, metformin, gab-whatever, insulin (injection)
and chemo (which, right now, I'm taking orally). If I go through North
Carolina and am stopped and agree to a search, the officer certainly
has a right to search me. But does s/he have a right to confiscate my
medication? Do they have a right to hold me in jail and deny me my
medication?
Alabama's stupid in not prescribing
medical marijuana but I don't see where they have the right to
interfere with a medical treatment.
They
violated Sean's rights right there. He has TBI and Post-Traumatic
Stress. They knew that. They put him behind bars without access to his
medication despite knowing that. They denied him his medication.
I'd like to know what medical professional in Alabama, who has a background in TBI and PTS treatment signed off on this?
I know the answer: No one did.
The state of Alabama disregarded a patient's treatment plan, stopped the treatment and did so without any medical supervision.
Police officers are not doctors.
This was a violation of his medical treatment.
His attorney has attempted to argue sympathy and that it was prescribed and so blah blah blah.
I
don't disagree with that argument but I do see that it hasn't had any
effect at all. The attorney's argued that for how long now?
Yes, it's helped in the court of public opinion.
I'm
glad people are supporting Sean and that they are behind him in larger
and larger numbers as they learn about this case. But support for Sean
right now is not translating into freedom.
When you're defense doesn't work in court, you go on the offensive.
His
attorney needs to immediately file charges against the State of
Alabama. We're not talking about the arrest here, we're talking about
the medical issue.
If tomorrow I'm in North
Carolina and they decide to disallow their citizens having prescriptions
for chemo, are they able to interfere with my medical treatment because
I'm driving through their state? Are they able to immediately halt my
medical treatment and to do so with no medical supervision, without
consulting any doctor at all?
No, they're not.
That's what they did.
If
his attorney has any real sense, he'll file immediately on that. And
he can pursue to victory -- he'd have to really bungle the case to
lose. Or he can drop the case when the State of Alabama realizes how
much they could lose -- Sean could potentially get rich off this case --
if they allow it to go to court. If the State decides they don't want
to go to court, one of the first things they're going to do is either
offer some sort of 'time served' option or drop the original charges.
Either
way, Sean would win. And I'm on the other phone (the snapshots are
dictated). Okay, just ran by a friend with the National Lawyers Guild
and her verdict? That's a sound argument and that's what she would do
were she representing Sean. "Put some fear into them [State of
Alabama]," she says, "and see if they don't suddenly want to resolve the
whole thing without prison time."
The State,
any of the fifty, does not have the right to stop our medical
treatment. And to stop it without having Sean see a doctor first who
agrees that this treatment can be stopped? That's not the United States
of America and I don't see any court insisting that the government has
that right.
They overstepped their rights and Sean should sue on the medical issue.
On
e-mails, Brian Stelter of CNN became a news topic late Monday. He lied
that the notion that Joe Biden should refuse to debate Donald Trump was
coming from the right-wing. Several drive-by e-mails insisted I was
wrong not to cover that. One person wrote, "I read your blog because I
think you try to be fair even though you're a bleeding heart lefty. Now
I doubt that because you ignored this topic."
You now doubt that I'm a bleeding heart lefty or you doubt that I try to be fair?
Monday morning, before Brian became a news topic, we already covered this topic. In Monday's snapshot,
I noted Democrat of the Bill Clinton administration Joe Lockhart had
proposed that. I noted he did so in a column he wrote for -- not FOX
NEWS -- CNN. I noted that it was an outrageous suggestion and it went
against everything a democracy stands for.
Later
that day, Brian entered the news cycle. He lied. He lies all the
time. I have no respect for him. He's built his career on lying and
he's one sided -- I'd say he's more centrist than left -- and he's
partisan and he's a clown who is ugly and looks like a child molester.
That he lies and that I think he's ugly and looks like a child
molester? Those aren't new comments. I've made them here and at THIRD
in pieces with Ava.
He has no charisma and he's disgusting ugly.
Why is he on TV in front of camera?
At
any rate, I don't plan what I'm going to write ahead of time each day.
I have no idea what the snapshot's going to emphasize until I'm about
to dictate or sometimes in the middle of dictating. At which point,
I'll say, "Okay, this is going to go at the top, above everything you've
already typed."
I missed Sean's case
completely. I did not know about it, had not heard about it. I was
dictating the snapshot when the other phone rang and a friend with a VSO
was on the line asking if I was going to cover Sean? I learned about
him in the middle of the snapshot and we went with FOX NEWS because
hours before they had published a report. (Which was a strong report,
by the way.)
So on Tuesday morning, Brian was
back in the news cycle for lying yet again. And I'd just learned of
Sean's plight. What was I going to go with? Sean.
He's
an Iraq War veteran and the State of Alabama thought they could
overrule his doctor's plan, they thought they could cease his medication
immediately and they thought they could do all of this without having
him see a single doctor to determine the medical impact their actions
could have.
I'm always going to go with the Seans of this world, sorry.
We
need to stand together when we're under attack and what was done to
Sean wasn't just wrong, it was also an attack on every one of us.
The coronavirus is an attack on all of us around the world. Like other countries, Iraq has been heavily hit. ALJAZEERA has a photo essay of the burials of COVID 19 victims and they note:
Every chapter of
Iraq's modern history can be seen in the sprawling cemetery of Wadi
al-Salam outside the holy city of Najaf. Its sandy expanse is growing,
this time with coronavirus victims.
A special burial
ground near the cemetery has been created specifically for COVID-19
victims because such burials have been rejected by Baghdad cemeteries
and other places in Iraq.
In Iraq, the virus has
been surrounded by stigma, driven by religious beliefs, customs and a
deep mistrust of the healthcare system.
Iraq has recorded close to 132,000 coronavirus cases and nearly 5,000 deaths.
XINHUA reports,
"The Iraqi Health Ministry reported on Tuesday 2,836 new COVID-19
cases, raising the total number in the country to 134,722. The new
cases included 769 in the capital Baghdad, 296 in Karbala,
244 in Erbil, 207 in Basra, 194 in Babil, 135 in Maysan, and 129 in
Najaf, the ministry said in a statement. It also reported 83 fatalities
during the day, raising the death toll
to 5,017, while 1,992 more patients recovered, bringing the total
number of recoveries to 96,103." Those are the numbers and they're
frightening. Samya Kullab and Nabil Al-Jurani (AP) look at how this impacts individual Iraqis:
In Iraq’s oil-rich south, the scorching summer months pose painful new
choices in the age of the coronavirus: stay at home in the sweltering
heat with electricity cut off for hours, or go out and risk the virus.
This
is Zain al-Abidin’s predicament. A resident of al-Hartha district, in
Basra province, Mr. Abidin lost his job due to pandemic-related
restrictions. During the day he listens helplessly to his four-month old
daughter cry in the unbearable heat, too poor to afford private
generators to offset up to eight-hour power cuts.
“I have no tricks to deal with this but to pray to God for relief,” he said.
Nearly
18 years after the US-led invasion of Iraq, the electricity issue has
never been solved. Somehow, oil rich Iraq can't provide reliable
electricity to its citizens. Mustafa al-Kadhimi became prime minister
on May 7th. He has made public remarks about the failures of previous
administration to fix this problem or even address it. He has promised
reform. Can he deliver?
When Mustafa al-Kadhimi became Iraq’s prime minister on May 7, after five months of political deadlock in Baghdad, I argued his best chance of success was to fail fast.
The only way to clean the Augean stables of Iraqi politics was with the
strong broom of a popular mandate — and that could only be obtained
from elections. Thoroughgoing political and economic reforms would
require a majority — or at least a plurality with which to build an
irresistible coalition — in parliament.
Last week, the prime minister called for early elections — on June 6, 2021, a year ahead of schedule.
But Iraq’s circumstances have deteriorated so much in the three months
since he took office, Kadhimi will have a much harder time convincing
Iraqis to give him a mandate to rule.
All the crises he inherited have deepened. The coronavirus pandemic, already alarming when Kadhimi was sworn in, has since only grown more frightening, forcing him to announce fresh lockdowns. The Iraqi economy, having suffered extensive collateral damage from the Saudi-Russian oil war, has weakened. Powerful, Iran-backed Shiite militias have grown more brazen. Corruption, already ingrained in the body politic, seems to have metastasized across every aspect of the state.
Even the weather has been worse than expected. Iraq is now wilting in the hottest summer ever recorded,
with temperatures nearing 52 degrees Celsius (125 Fahrenheit) in
Baghdad and 53C (127F) in Basra last week. The heat threatens to bring
the protests against electricity and water shortages — a summer fixture
in the Iraqi political calendar — to a fever pitch. Some demonstrations in Baghdad have already boiled over into clashes with security forces: Two protesters were killed last Monday.
How
does he address corruption when so many of the leaders are corrupt?
It's a question few want to address. But the corruption is well known.
When Democrats in Congress knew they could use Iraq to garner votes,
they would hold hearings about what was happening to all the US dollars
being sent to Iraq -- dollars that never managed to help the people.
They stopped those hearing when Barack Obama became president and they
also ended the watchdog office over reconstruction in Iraq -- over the
objection of the person in that office. With Barack in the White House,
Democrats no longer wanted oversight of Iraq. They didn't stop the
flow of US tax dollars to Iraq, they just stopped caring where the money
went. Roopinder Tara (ENGINEERING.COM) writes about the corruption this morning:
In the power vacuum left after the fall of Saddam Hussein’s
government, a thicket of corruption has erupted. The corruption took
hold during the end of Saddam’s reign, when international sanctions
against Iraq resulted in the slashing of government officials’ incomes
and the workers resorting to taking bribes, according to a recent report
in The New York Times.
The World Population Review report ranks Iraq the 11th most corrupt country in the world in 2020.
In 2011, a $148 million project was planned to turn Baghdad’s Sadr al
Qanaat thoroughfare into an idyllic outdoor park with sports fields,
restaurants, playgrounds and a canal with decorative bridges over it.
But that site is now “a dismal dumping ground with little sign that
anything was ever spent on it.”
Where did the money go? According to The Times, it went into
the pockets of corrupt officials who, with the backing of militias,
funnel billions of dollars supplied by the United States for
construction projects into their personal international bank accounts.
Iraqi Prime Minister Mustafa Al-Kadhimi is set to visit Washington soon,
although he does not yet have a date or an invitation, so he is
scrambling to say all the right things in order to secure a meeting with
US President Donald Trump.
Iraq is worse off than it was two weeks ago and this last week has
propelled two items to the top of the list for Al-Kadhimi’s visit to the
US: Kata’ib Hezbollah’s continued attacks on the US and Iraqis, and
calls by Al-Kadhimi for early elections that Kata’ib Hezbollah and its
allies in Iraq’s Council of Representatives won’t allow to happen.
The top agenda item for Trump is for Al-Kadhimi to do something about
the militias that he supposedly commands as Iraq’s commander in chief.
The militias that fall under the government’s security apparatus are
attacking US personnel in Iraq, which are there to partner with the
Baghdad government to ensure the enduring defeat of Daesh. The militias
have now become more of a threat to the US and Iraqis than Daesh.
Trump wants to know if the US has a partner in Iraq. The president is
willing to pull US forces out of Iraq if this “partner” continues to
disappoint. Republicans and Democrats are looking for a reason to end
this experiment. And it won’t be without costs to Baghdad and Tehran.
Two actions by the Democrat-led House of Representatives point to a
breakup if nothing changes. Democrats voted to cut funding for the US
mission in Iraq by $145 million and Republican Rep. Joe Wilson was able
to get two amendments passed that would ensure no US dollars go to any
institution in Iraq where the militias have access to the funds — that
would mean the Ministry of Defense and Ministry of Interior would be
most affected.
It’s been three years since the guns fell silent in Mosul, the
onetime capital of the Islamic State of Iraq and al-Sham (ISIS). With
the Caliphate finally pushed out, it seemed the nightmare of extremist
rule was finally coming to an end, giving Iraq’s Christian minority a
chance to reclaim their homes after years spent sheltering under brutal
conditions, fleeing to refugee camps, or taking flight abroad.
Instead, their hopes of rebuilding have diminished even as the threat
of the Caliphate has faded. The region’s few remaining Christians find
themselves caught between Iran-backed Shia militias and an Iraqi
government that, nearly twenty years after the American invasion, is
politically paralyzed and still unable to provide basic security and services—let
alone protect the country’s embattled minority populations. As a
result, most Iraqi Christians are searching for brighter pastures, even
if it means forever parting with the land of their ancestors.
“Of the twenty thousand Christians that fled Mosul when ISIS came,
only one hundred have returned,” said Reine Hanna, director of the
Assyrian Policy Institute. “People can’t work and earn a living among
ruins. There’s little incentive to return.”
The country that is now Iraq has been home to various Christian
communities for more than two thousand years. Falling mostly outside the
Roman Empire, where the Christianity familiar to most Westerners today
took its basic shape, Iraqi Christians developed their own unique forms
of Christian worship and theology which endure to this day; they draw
heavily on ancient liturgical rites, prayers, and customs.
The fortunes of the region’s Christians vacillated with the many
empires that rose and fell over the centuries. Prior to the US-led
invasion in 2003, the country was home to 1.5 million
Christians. But, despite their endurance over the centuries, the
subsequent occupation and insurgency proved to be a breaking point. By
2014, shortly before the rise of ISIS, over eight hundred thousand of Iraq’s Christians had fled abroad, with many making new homes in the United States and Western Europe.
The establishment of the ISIS Caliphate drove the few remaining
Christians out of the region to avoid living under a regime that gave
them an ultimatum:
pay a special tax for non-believers or leave or be killed. Nearly all
chose to leave to the Kurdish north. While ISIS’ territorial defeat
provided an opening for the return of Mosul’s Christians, that hope has
quickly faded in the face of the grim state of Iraqi politics. The
biggest challenge facing the country are the militias that control the
territory formerly occupied by the Caliphate.
Today, the Popular Mobilization Forces
(PMF), an umbrella group of various militias—mainly backed by Shia
clerics and Iran—that were once seen as integral to the fight against
ISIS, are now focused on controlling the areas they liberated. They are
also determined to further their own political agenda. The PMF have already been documented committing a number of crimes across Iraq, including looting, revenge killings against Sunni Arabs, and seizure of property.
There is a growing fear that many PMF units will ultimately occupy
towns indefinitely, since they have not left the ones they liberated.
This is creating a climate where they mete out whatever justice or
injustice their militia leaders dictate. Exploiting Iraq’s fractured
political and security landscape, PMF units have erected their own
system of check points and recruitment offices
in towns across the country, giving them an advantage over the domestic
security situation. They have even entered politics, helping
Iran-backed groups gain even more leverage over Iraqi affairs, such as
its economy.
No comments:
Post a Comment