Wasn't really looking forward to BARBIE: THE MOVIE. My girlfriend wanted to see it so we were going to see it opening weekend. But wasn't too thrilled. I did get excited though after C.I.'s Thursday snapshot where she talked about Barbie. I didn't play with Barbies but I played with other toys and I could appreciate the enthusiasm C.I. had for Barbie.
It was actually a good movie. On visuals, I will give it an A+. The sets, the colors were fresh and wonderful. The script was strong -- solid A. And Rhea Pearlman? There's no film without her. Her role is small (she plays the creator of Barbie). I don't know anyone who could have hit all the notes she does in the role. I'm not joking. She deserves real credit, in fact, I won't be surprised if she gets an Academy Award nomination for Best Supporting Actress. She's that important to the film and if her character, Ruth, doesn't work, the movie doesn't work.
Margot Robbie is great in it and finally gets to shine after too many films recently that had no idea how to utilize her. She's perfect in the role. And the film's going to be a hit and deserves to be. The only one who needs a hit more than Margot right now is . . . Ryan Gosling. So he was smart to play Ken.
Go see it, you'll be surprised how much you like it and the film should win Academy Award nominations not only for Rhea Pearlman but also for set designs and costumes.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, July 21, 2023. Some crazies in Iraq attack Sweden's embassy,
Marjorie Taylor Greene takes her porn addiction public and distributes
her favorite photos to Congress, Republicans in Congress support every
veteran and service member . . . up until the point they turn out to be
gay or transgender or they want to have an abortion or pretty much
anything, Jason Aldean's racism continues to find a defender in Jonathan
The Turd Turley who refuses to allow his own ignorance to silence him,
and much more.
Iraq has expelled Sweden's ambassador and recalled its top diplomatic
representative from Sweden over the desecration of the Quran in the
Nordic country.
The move came hours after protesters attacked
the Swedish Embassy in Baghdad earlier Thursday, setting fire to part of
the building.
The tensions between Iraq and Sweden began when
an Iraqi national set fire to a copy of the Quran in the Swedish capital
of Stockholm last month.
Yes, the Baghdad chapter of Moms For Liberty remains active.
REUTERS adds, "Seconded staff and operations at the Swedish embassy in Baghdad have
been relocated temporarily to Stockholm for security reasons after it
was stormed by protesters, the Swedish Foreign Ministry said on Friday."
CNN notes:
Eyewitnesses told CNN that the protesters withdrew from the
perimeter of the Swedish Embassy after setting part of it on fire “after
delivering their message of protest against the act of burning the Holy
Book of God.”
Several journalists covering the protests were detained by
security forces, and at least one was beaten, according to multiple
organizations.
“Journalists should be free to report the news without fear of
harassment or harm, wherever they are,” Reuters Iraq Bureau Chief Timour
Azhari tweeted Thursday. Two detained Reuters journalists were released
after several hours, the agency said.
Ziyad Al-Ajili, the head of the Iraq-based Journalistic Freedoms
Observatory (JFO) told CNN that three photojournalists working with
international news agencies were arrested and another was beaten by
security forces and his camera destroyed.
These
crazed loons deserve no respect and they shouldn't be coddled and
'understood.' Their behavior is unacceptable and since others are
outraged outside of Iraq? Then those crazies should aim their own anger
at Iraq. Not Sweden.
It's not a Swede that's done this.
AP notes:
Lebanon's Shiite militant group Hezbollah also called for a
demonstration Friday afternoon. Khamenei and Iran's theocracy serve as
Hezbollah's main sponsor.
In Pakistan, Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif
strongly condemned the events in Sweden. He called on the 57-nation
Organization of Islamic Cooperation to play a “historic role in
expressing the sentiments of Muslims and stopping this demonization.”
Meanwhile, Islamists in his country have been pushing Sharif, who faces
an upcoming election, to cut diplomatic ties with Sweden.
So
in your poor pathetic minds this is outrageous and must be addressed?
Then turn that anger at Iraq. It's an Iraqi that's doing it. Hold Iraq
accountable for their own people.
I can't
imagine anything more lunatic than the attack on the embassy because a
holy book was stepped on. But if that's your last straw and sends you
to crazy land, you damn well better grasp that it was an Iraqi person
protesting Iraq in Sweden who's done this.
So Lebanon, Pakistan whomever, take that anger to Iraq.
THIS IS THE WORST THING THAT'S EVER HAPPENED! OH, WE MUST DESTROY EVERYTHING!
Okay.
If that's your feeling, take it to Iraq. Take it the country where it
belongs. It's an Iraqi citizen doing it. You're attacking the country
of Sweden. They didn't raise the person, Iraq did. Condemn Iraq.
Salwan Momika is not a Swede. He's an Iraqi citizen.
The US State Dept issued the following:
Press Statement
Matthew Miller, Department Spokesperson
July 20, 2023
The United States strongly condemns the attack on the Swedish Embassy in
Baghdad in the early hours of July 20. Freedom of peaceful assembly is
an essential hallmark of democracy, but what occurred last night was an
unlawful act of violence. It is unacceptable that Iraqi Security
Forces did not act to prevent protestors from breaching the Swedish
Embassy compound for a second time and damaging it. We are in contact
with our Swedish partners and have offered our support. Foreign
missions should not be targets of violence. We call on the Government
of Iraq to honor its international obligations to protect all diplomatic
missions in Iraq against any intrusion or damage, as required by
international law.
Turning
to US crazy, what's happened to Congress? You've got members of the
House using swear words in hearings and Marjorie Taylor Greene passing
around porn during a hearing. On the latter, here's SECULAR TALK.
And Paul Rudnick notes.
Lindsey Graham really has become the Beverly Leslie of the Senate, have you noticed?
Staying with the ridiculous, the idiot Jonathan Turley took a moment out from
flaunting his transphobia to again weigh in on music in his own
uninformed manner:
Protest songs have long played a critical part of our political dialogue, from “Yankee Doodle Dandy” to “War.”
This controversy only helps highlight how the corporate effort to control what people hear or consume is backfiring.
Again, does this man know the English language? A protest song?
Aldean
recorded a reactionary song. That he didn't write. This is not Bob
Dylan's "Blowing In The Wind." Does Turdley not grasp basic concepts? It he
just culturally illiterate? We know he's a sexist. He tried to quote
Carly Simon and couldn't get the lyric right but, even worse, didn't
give her credit for the song she actually wrote ("Anticipation"),
refused to name her because that's just what a piece of filth he is.
Bob Roberts takes place in Pennsylvania in 1990. It depicts a fictitious senatorial race between a conservative Republican folk singer, Bob Roberts, and the incumbent Democrat,
Brickley Paiste. The film is shot through the perspective of Terry
Manchester, a British documentary filmmaker who is following the Roberts
campaign. Through Manchester's lens we see Roberts travel across the
state and sing about drug users, lazy people and the triumph of
traditional family values and laissez-faire capitalism
over the rebelliousness and social justice causes of the 1960s. Even
though the Roberts campaign team officially avoids manifestations of
open bigotry, their songs, speech and mannerisms are rife with snobbish dog whistles and racist and sexist innuendos, and Manchester's footage reveals casual use of homophobic slurs.
For
those who weren't paying attention in real time, Turd was egging on a
boycott of Bud Light the same way he's currently egging on one against
CMT with one tweet after another predicting bad things to come.
I
do not have time to educate him on the long history of the lyrics to
"Yankee Doodle" -- I don't feel like wasting my time. This is an idiot
who calls the song -- which is the state song of Connecticut -- "Yankee Doodle Dandy" when its title is "Yankee Doodle."
As
we noted here recently, he ends up writing papers -- such as the one
for Harvard -- where he later footnotes false claims by citing his own
Tweets and blog posts. So, yes, it does matter. It also matters
because he's supposed to be a learned person and yet he continues to
write about things he knows nothing about and never bothers to correct
his errors.
The song is "Yankee Doodle."
Jonathan Turley is a moron who couldn't pass AP English let alone a law course. Here are two responses to his online stupidity:
"MAGA
academic, Jonathan Turley, is now apparently an expert on country
music. Is there nothing this Renaissance man can't do?" -- East Coaster Tweeted that in reply.
George
Washington University, your raving lunatic is wandering around in
traffic. How about you get him back in the home, in front of the TV for
WHEEL OF FORTUNE, and on his meds?
Does
anyone else remembering him defending Dylan Mulvaney when her free
speech rights were at stake? Nope. Because he wasn't interested. He's
a fright-winger -- and, to his credit, as we noted a little while ago,
he did inadvertently come out on that in a Tweet. He's such garbage.
The fright-wing targets Dylan and he's not at all bothered. But go
after his boy singer and he's losing it. That's all Aldean is a little
boy singer. A fake ass who can't write a song. A fake ass who isn't
allowed to play guitar on his albums -- not real guitar, not lead
guitar. Because he can't write songs and he can't really play an
instrument. He's a fake ass singing the words someone else wrote
because he's that inauthentic.
Jonathan Turley does not believe in free speech. He believes in all speech spoken by right-wingers.
He's
like the hypocrites on the right who try to hide behind US troops and
veterans. They support them, they insist. But the reality is that they
only support them if they follow right-wing edicts.
You're
applauded by the fright wing for serving your country . . . until you
need an abortion, for example, or until you're gay or trans.
We
all know of the hypocrite Senator Tommy Tuberville who spent his life
spewing one homophobic comment at students after another. Disclosure:
There's one that I've encouraged to sue Tuberville. What would come of
it? Exposure of what a lousy piece of garbage Tuberville is and put
current educators on notice that you're not going to get away with this
anymore. You are not there to harm the children. Your bigotry is not
what you're paid for, it's not academic, it's not acceptable and you
will be held accountable. It's been a year now, I just realized, since
this issue was raised when we were speaking. There are many gay men
across the country (and I'm sure many lesbians as well) whose lives were
severely harmed and damaged by 'educators' (coaches with no education
and no brains but plenty of hate) who set out to destroy kids on campus,
who egged on other students to torment students.
And
don't say, "Those were different times," because it is never -- NEVER
-- acceptable for an adult employed by a school to scapegoat a student
or encourage other students to harm a student. Never. Full stop.
There's
no excuse for that for any reason and "those were different times" is
unacceptable. Tuberville, for example, was not hired by a school system
so he could attack a student or to encourage others to attack a
student.
If
you're not getting how awful and disgusting Tuberville is, look at Lt
Jnr Grade Audrey Knutson serves in the US Navy and is a member of the
JAG Corps. Supposedly, that's a great thing to Bubba Tuberville.
Supposedly. But Knutson is non-binary. So Tuberville trashes Knutson.
As we noted earlier this week, he's blocking Defense Dept nominees from
getting a vote. Why? Because he does not want service members or
their families to have abortions. So Tuberville 'respects' service
members and veterans . . . as long as they parrot his own beliefs. Talk
about censoring free speech -- which means Jonathan Turd Turley will
never speak of it.
"Raise your right hand, and repeat after me," an authoritative voice commanded.
I
was 17 years old, in a room beneath the Brooklyn Bridge, and my parents
had agreed to support my unwavering commitment to serve as a fresh
recruit in the United States Army.
While
a gleaming sense of honor enveloped me, there was an undeniable fear
lingering in my eyes, stemming from the daunting task of standing tall
as a queer soldier.
This
fear was not new, but from past trauma from the experiences I had
growing up. During my childhood, I was constantly reminded that being
queer was not something to be proud of.
Being
overcome with feelings of loneliness and abandonment was normal,
especially when I heard the quiet whispers behind my back. I didn't feel
like a man, but rather a complete outcast for one simple reason: I
liked boys. I never could comprehend how something that seemed so small
led to so much hate.
That was until I saw hate turn to murder.
I
enlisted in the Army in 2017, shortly after the devastating Pulse
nightclub shooting. During this moment, I couldn't help but be consumed
by its harrowing aftermath. The thought relentlessly played over and
over again in my mind.
A profound realization struck me: Love should be inconsequential, for we all wear the same uniform.
According to CBS News,
figures reveal there were 35,801 individuals discharged due to their
sexual orientation from 1980 to 2011, and 81 percent of these soldiers
were denied honorable discharges.
These
soldiers were stripped of support systems that should have helped
reintegrate them into society. Instead, these LGBTQ+ veterans have been
abandoned by the very institutions they swore to protect.
Tuberville's a member of the US Senate and he's not defending those veterans. Nor is 'legal' 'expert' Turley.
Dianne
Hensley, a justice of the peace in Waco, Texas, refused to perform
same-sex marriages in 2019 on the grounds that officiating the
ceremonies would conflict with her sincerely-held religious belief as a
Christian. Hensley was formally warned by the State Commission on Judicial Conduct that she should recuse herself in such matters if she refused to follow the law.
Hensley
responded by suing the commission for burdening her free exercise of
religion and asking for $10,000 in damages. After the Supreme Court
ruled in favor of Lorrie Smith in late June, Hensley’s lawyer submitted a
letter brief that argued his client should prevail just as Smith had.
Hensley’s
attorney, Jonathan Mitchell, acknowledged in the letter that the
Court’s holding in 303 Creative v. Elenis had been grounded in First
Amendment law, but argued that the ruling should still be “instructive,”
because it stands for the idea that wedding vendors should not be
compelled to participate in “same-sex and opposite-sex marriage
ceremonies on equal terms.”
By contrast, Hensley’s objection is more closely analogous to the case of Kim Davis,
the former Kentucky county clerk who refused to grant marriage licenses
to same-sex couples even after the Supreme Court ruled that marriage
equality was a constitutionally-protected right in 2015.
Like
Hensley, Davis cited her personal religious objections to same-sex
marriage as grounds for refusing to follow the law. When a federal court
ordered Davis to start issuing marriage licenses, Davis appealed, lost,
and was ultimately jailed for contempt of court.
You're
not being 'creative' -- even by Jonathan Turdley's definition -- you're
fulfilling the duties of the public office that you campaigned for.
You
don't like it? Too bad. Retire. If it's against your religious
beliefs, retire. And if you're arguing that you can't do your elected
duties -- something as basic as marrying two adults -- because of
religious beliefs then you really shouldn't be on the bench. You're
confessing to everyone -- including those who might come before your
bench -- that you don't believe in equality and that you feel you have a
right to discriminate against gay men and lesbians. I don't understand
how this doesn't require you to be removed from the bench.
Your
religious freedom allows you to worship where you want. It does not
allow you to discriminate -- not even that idiotic verdict in Liar Lori
Smith's case allows public officials to determine what elected job
duties that they will and will not carry out.
You ran for office, you got elected, you do your job or you step down.
It's
not that complicated. And if she's too prejudiced to hear LGBTQ+
issues, then we should also remove from her court any case involving a
child who was born out of wedlock or to people in high school since her
'religious' 'beliefs' also include preaching abstinence -- that's why
she was a director at the McClennan County Abstinence Project for almost
a year in 2004, after all, and a trainer there for the year prior.
Jason Tudor"What is the judge of the peace?
justice
of the peace, in Anglo-American legal systems, a local magistrate
empowered chiefly to administer criminal or civil justice in minor
cases. A justice of the peace may, in some jurisdictions, also
administer oaths and perform marriages"
YOU SHALL NEVER PRESIDE IN A COURT OF LAW BASED ON YOUR POLITICAL AND RELIGIOUS BELIEFS.
YOU CANNOT BE TRUSTED TO BE IMPARTIAL IN CERTAIN CASES.
Kathy AsherShe
doesn’t have a problem taking the LGBTQ money each month. She’s a
hypocrite on the taxpayers dime. Nothing like taxation without
representation. Sound familiar you bigot.
According
to the Texas judicial commission’s 2019 warning, Hensley referred gay
couples who wanted her to preside over their marriage ceremony to other
people who would officiate. The state’s judicial code requires judges to
conduct “extra-judicial activities” in ways that don’t cast doubt on
their impartiality on the bench. The commission issued a public warning,
saying she cast doubt “on her capacity to act impartially to persons
appearing before her as a judge due to the person’s sexual orientation.”
According
to Dale Carpenter, chair of constitutional law at Southern Methodist
University’s Dedman School of Law, the U.S. Supreme Court case has
little to do with Hensley’s case, since one is dealing with private
businesses, and Hensley is a government official acting in an official
capacity.
Johnathan
Gooch, a spokesperson for Equality Texas and a University of Texas at
Austin School of Law graduate reiterated Carpenter’s points on the
differences between the two cases, and pointed to Hensley’s position as a
purveyor of the law.
“The
law of the land is marriage equality. It’s as simple as that,” Gooch
said. “If judges and justices of the peace were empowered to only
enforce the laws that they agreed with, we would quickly descend into
anarchy.”
“I
have nothing to say anymore,” said Verniss McFarland, founder and
executive director of the Mahogany Project, which advocates for LGBTQ+
communities of color. “As a Black trans femme person, we are already on
the margins. When something like this happens, it’s just like: ‘Oh, this
again.’”
With the Supreme Court decision on Creative LLC vs. Elenis, businesses could now be permitted to refuse service to same-sex couples.
In
writing that "our Nation's answer" to "ideas we consider
'unattractive'" is "tolerance, not coercion" in the majority opinion, I
believe Supreme Court Justice Niel Gorsuch essentially enables and
empowers Jim-Crow-era systems of segregation against the LGBTQ+
community on the basis of the First Amendment.
We
cannot sit idly as our hard-fought progress erodes and our fundamental
rights are trampled upon. While exercising our right to vote holds
profound significance, it alone is insufficient.
As a society, if we do not fight back and demand change, we will continue to move backward.
We
must boldly challenge our leaders, celebrate queer jobs, and affirm to
every American that inclusivity knows no bounds. This belief is what
fuels the spirit of our soldiers, including myself, who fight to
safeguard this very freedom that is entitled to all.
We'll wind down with
this from Jeffrey St. Clair (COUNTERPUNCH):
+ Under the Florida Board of Education’s newly approved Black history
standards students will be taught that slavery was a kind of
apprenticeship for Western Civilization, where enslaved Black people
developed life and trade skills that “could be applied for their
personal benefit.”
+ Jason Aldean–the
country singer who was on-stage during the mass shooting at a 2017 Las
Vegas concert that killed 60 people and wounded over 400 more–has
recorded a song called “Try That In A Small Town” about how he and his
friends will shoot you if you try to take their guns. The video for this
tribute to the righteous vigilantism of Sundown towns features Aldean
singing in front of the Maury County Courthouse in Columbia, Tennessee,
where in 1927 a lynch mob of 300 white men strung up the body of Henry
Coat from the second story window, after dragging his body through the
streets of the town behind a car. According to historian Elizabeth
Queene, around 20 Black men
and boys were lynched, killed by other methods or “disappeared” by
White mobs or the Ku Klux Klan in Maury County. In 1946, the town of
Columbia was the site of a post-WW II “race riot,” where Thurgood
Marshall, who was in town defending two of the black suspects, narrowly
escaped being lynched himself.
+ Jason Aldean: “Try That in a Small Town, for me, refers to the
feeling of a community that I had growing up.” Aldean grew up in Macon,
Georgia population 157,000.
+ This is something a reversal for Aldean, who just a couple of years
ago released a song called “Rearview Town” about how he left a small
town because it was so dull: “I could tough it out, but what’s the use? /
A place that small, it’s hard to do.”
+ South Dakota Governor Kristi Noem: “I am shocked by what I’m seeing
in this country, with people attempting to cancel the song and cancel
Jason and his beliefs.” Uh, the Coup and the Dixie Chicks would like a
word, Governor…
[. . .]
+ Aldean’s lynching “song” is now No. 1 on the charts. I wish someone would “cancel” one of my books.
+ Jason Isbell: “Dare Aldean to write his next single himself. That’s what we try in my small town.”
The following sites updated:
No comments:
Post a Comment