Everything about the new Joker film is pretentious including the title JOKER: FOLIE A DEUX. The script is lousy in every way possible. The entire first act of the film falls flat with Joaquin Phoenix a silent shell. Who thought we wanted to see that? If we did need to see, they could have established it in the first eight minutes and then moved on. Instead, they spend about 30 minutes with that ick and nonsense that the film could never recover from. But someone must have thought, "This misery that the audience has to endure will win Joaquin another Oscar!" If he had anything to offer in this role, it didn't make onto the big screen.
I praised the original film -- see "JOKER " -- and that one had bad worth of mouth leading up to its release and some critics were also slamming it before it came out.
So I was hoping that this film was just having the same issues.
But this time, it's a bad, bad film.
I love UP THE SANDBOX. That's one of Barbra Streisand's best films. I love it. Some people don't. They argue that there are too many fantasies and it's confusing for them -- what is real, what is fantasy. I don't understand that. I don't understand how Barbra's Margaret and a group of revolutionaries going to blow up the statue of Liberty is confusing. It's not real. The woman Barbra plays is raising two kids and trying to figure out whether or not she wants a third. She has a number of fantasies about how her life could be different and that includes meeting Fidel Castro, blowing up the statue of Liberty, going to Africa, physically fighting with her mother . . .
JOKER: FOLIE A DEUX is nothing but confusion. And that includes is Joaquin even playing Joker? Is he just crazy and thinks he is Joker?
Lady Gaga is the only thing onscreen worth praising. She's playing Harley Quinn.
I'm not a Lady Gag fan. Her music has never spoken to me and her big song that I do know always struck me as an obvious rip-off of Madonna's "Express Yourself."
As an actress, I have been impressed with her. She hasn't given a bad performance and she was amazing in A STAR IS BORN -- and her singing was great in that too.
My fear here was that Lady Gaga was going to destroy the film. That's based on the X-Men movies. Mystique? Played to perfection by Rebecca Romijn. Amazing performance, haunting work. Then they make the characters younger and hire "Oscar winner" Jennifer Lawrence to play the part and Mystique is awful. Jennifer tried to hard to 'act' the part and she was dead onscreen.
Margot Robbie has already brought Harley Quinn to life in three films and she's been the best thing about every one of those films.
So that was my fear here. Lady Gaga was going to try to hard to 'act' and overwhelm the character and make her boring.
That didn't happen. Gaga's got her own take on Harley and it works. And when she's onscreen, the film comes closest to working. But then is this segment a dream or fantasy, what the hell's going on?
It's all too confusing and, honestly, too damn insulting.
See it for Lady Gaga. If you don't see it, at least know that she was the best thing in the film.
Kat's "Kris Kristofferson" notes the passing of actor, songwriter and singer. Be sure to check out.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Trump is now trying to get obstruction charges tossed from his federal election conspiracy case, arguing that the Supreme Court's recent decision in Fischer v. United States, which erased obstruction charges for January 6 rioters, also applies to him.
But that's not a done deal, former federal prosecutor Elie Honig explained to CNN's Kaitlan Collins on Thursday evening, because special counsel Jack Smith, who recently made an enormous filing detailing explosive evidence against Trump in the case, has one key way he can make a distinction between Trump and the rioters at issue in the Supreme Court's decision.
So RAW STORY is covering the issue.
We hear criticism that Donald's insane mutterings are getting "sane washed" by reporters who try to justify the remarks or down play them or try to instead report what they think he was trying to say. And that's wrong.
But it's also wrong that DEMOCRACY NOW!, COMMON DREAMS, IN THESE TIMES and so many others are ignoring what's at stake.
They don't like Kamala, these outlets. They're too busy grudge f**king America to argue on its behalf.
Many of them are telling and hoping Americans will waste their vote on Jill Stein. She's not going to win and you're throwing your vote away because you're supporting MAGA and Trump because that's who has provided the legal support and the financial support to Jill Stein.
Your inflamed over Gaza to the point that you can't see reality. Trump's not going to help Palestinians. He would make things much, much worse.
Not only are they voting to harm Palestinians, they're also harming support for Palestinians -- support in the US. They don't know what they're doing. And when those of us who were covering it regularly (here, it was daily) stepped back because the Jill Stein crazies lied to America that it was supporting Gaza or supporting Kamala Harris, we saw how interest in the issue caved.
Because they don't know how to sell the issue, they don't know to structure the narrative.
The killing in Gaza has not stopped. But most Americans are not as tied to the issue as they were. It's become a I HATE AMERICA movement with the crazies in charge. And hate is never going to rally good people. It can frighten and trick stupid people -- and often does.
So they offer their hate. And they join with other haters like Glenn Greenwald who can't shut up about, for example, Dick Cheney. And people do realize that Glenn helped sell the Iraq War, right? He was for it. And yet today, he's the virgin protecting his maidenhead from Dick. Ed Snowden's also attacking Kamala Harris. From Russia. As is Tara Reade. From Russia. Seems the more you hate America, the more you flirt with Donald Trump.
I don't know what COMMON DREAMS, DEMOCRACY NOW! and others think there future is. I know that one of the biggest things we're discussing right now -- those of us who have funded independent media -- is their behavior currently. And we're not planning on funding this garbage again.
We're a month away from a US election and DEMOCRACY NOW ignored Jack Smith's filings to give us a film ALJAZEERA made and broadcast about another country.
In a Donald Trump administration, other nations will not be pressured regarding human rights abuses or anything else.
I rightly criticized DEMOCRACY NOW! in 2009 for doing an inauguration party for Barack Obama and I had spent 2008 noting how the program tilted the scales and flat out lied -- Melissa Lie Face Harris you are not forgotten nor do I ever forget that Amy Goodman knew she was campaigning for Barack -- knew it by appearing on Rev Jesse Jackson's program with Lie Face -- and then brought her on DEMOCRACY NOW! and lied to the audience by presenting Lie Face as a disinterested college professor.
That I called out.
That's not journalism and it's nothing to be proud of.
They should be ashamed to this day.
And I am not calling for them to provide that kind of treatment to Kamala Harris campaign. (Although it is worth noting that they and other outlets celebrated Barack Obama as a Black candidate -- remember David Lindorf's infamous quote? -- while today refusing to celebrate Kamala as the same.) All I'm asking is that they cover the news, actually cover the news. And Jack Straw's filing is news. And Myrlie Evers-Williams endorsing Kamala Harris was news. But DEMOCRACY NOW! couldn't even note that in a headline -- despite having had this Civil Rights pioneer, the widow of Medgar Everts on their program before.
You're not doing journalism.
So-called 'independent' media -- that begs constantly for money -- either whores for their favored candidate or they ignore the one that they don't care about.
There's no balance, there's nothing between the two extremes. And this is not journalism and should not be mistaken for it.
As Stacey Abrams notes in the video above, "There could not be a starker choice."
Stacey Abrams . . . who's been a guest multiple times on DEMOCRACY NOW! in the past. But endorsing Kamala means she's vanished.
I've talked about why I support the coalition building around Kamala. Maybe Amy doesn't? Could be. But how is this coalition not worthy of a debate or segment on DEMOCRACY NOW!?
We know who Donald Trump is. We know the damage he has done. We know the damage he wants to do. I don't see the point in ever giving another dime to DEMOCRACY NOW! or any of the other outlets that are working to get Donald back in the White House.
What I'm hearing as I speak with one group after another every day this week is that 'independent' media doesn't care about Black people. They complain about the way DN! and others refuse to celebrate Kamala Harris' run as historic, they complain about how their views and their opinions are not being embraced. I'm going to note Betty's post from last night:
"We need to take his comments very, very seriously, partly because this time he's bull-in-a-china-shop determined to get his way, partly because (by contrast with 2016) he's surrounded by a core of smart and ruthlessly committed helpers and ideologues, whose ideas are most definitely coherent, thought-through and focused," Eley said in an email.
Trump's "political accomplishment," Eley said, has been in imparting to large swaths of the country that "democracy, proceduralism, civility, speaking across differences, and the rule of law have outlived their purposes — they're fictions, illusions, tricks, and they no longer matter."
Despite Trump's insistence both at the rally and throughout his campaign that crime "has gone through the roof," data indicates that the opposite is true.
Recently released FBI stats show a 2.4% decrease in property crime between 2022 and 2023. Preliminary data comparing periods of 2024 ranging from the first quarter to the first half to the same periods of 2023 also indicated a drop in violent crime following the COVID-19 isolation-era uptick, suggesting this year will see a continued decline in the nation's crime rate.
“They made him chair of the Black Caucus. Whoop-de-doo,” Lee said on an audiotape obtained by HuffPost.
Lee went on to denigrate the CBC, following a pattern of insults over the last year. In August, he said they were comparable to a “blond-haired caucus,” and he had previously called the group “stupid.”
Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee spokesperson Lauryn Fanguen condemned Lee’s remarks in a statement.
“John Lee’s shocking comments about Black Nevadans and CBC Chair Steven Horsford are not only deeply offensive but betray an utter disdain for a large swath of the district he claims to want to represent,” Fanguen said.
Ava and I have spent a lot of time in Georgia with Betty (Betty is exclusively speaking Georgia -- her home state -- and has taken time off from her job to do so).
Donald Trump is using Black people, threats against them, insults and targeting them for violence. And that's disgusting. But where's our 'independent' media in this? They aren't rushing to defend.
We were speaking -- Betty, Ava
and I -- near Johns Creek yesterday to a group and a Black woman from
Johns Creek stated she felt as though the left media -- she named COMMON
DREAMS -- was playing the oppression olympics and giving all this
credence to issues outside this country while ignoring the very threats
to Black people in our country.
Betty is correct in her post that Donald's doing dog whistles and Willie Horton-ing Black people. He's playing to and promoting racism. And apparently White-White-White 'independent' media can't grasp that -- can't grasp what Black people are seeing and feeling.
Let's note that THE BLACK COMMENTATOR is back from its summer hiatus:
Hurricane preparation, survival and cleanup
delayed publication of this issue
October 3, 2024
Read issue 1012
No comments:
Post a Comment