Friday, February 27, 2026

SCREAM 7

SCREAM 7 is  a tight film.  If you've seen them all, you'll see this one.  I've seen them all and found this one to be very entertaining.  Neve Campbell's back as Sidney.  She was my only problem.  

I don't have a problem with Neve as an actress.  The set up for this film; however, has Sidney married and with kids including a teenage daughter.  I'm just seeing that as rather strange.  SCREAM (2022) -- or SCREAM 5 -- gave no indication of this.  Neve was in that film.  If Sidney had not been in the fifth film, if her last appearance had been in 2011's SCREAM 4, I might have accepted it more easily.  I don't think so though.  Sidney had been built up to be a survivor who knew she couldn't trust anyone so her marrying and having children?  Just seems a bit of a stretch for me.


That's my only quibble.  Otherwise, you'll enjoy it.  


In other news,  Andreas Wiseman (DEADLINE) reports:

Oscar-winning actress Susan Sarandon is in Spain this weekend to collect a career achievement prize at the 40th Goya awards.

Speaking at a press conference in Barcelona today, the decorated star discussed her support for Palestine — a cause close to the heart of the Spanish government — and recent career challenges, which she said had come about because of that support.

The Thelma And Louise star was dropped by UTA in 2023 after attending several rallies in support of Palestine and at one point telling a crowd: “There are a lot of people afraid of being Jewish at this time, and are getting a taste of what it feels like to be a Muslim in this country.” She later apologized for those comments.

Sarandon told media today that her actions and words had led to her being shunned by Hollywood: “I was fired by my agency, specifically for marching and speaking out about Gaza, for asking for a cease fire, and it became impossible for me to even be on television. I don’t know lately if it’s changed, but, I couldn’t do any major film, anything connected with Hollywood.”    



Going out with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Friday, February 27, 2026.  Yesterday, members of the House Oversight Committee went to Chappaqua to show how the Republican-controlled Committee will do anything in its power to avoid actually addressing Jeffrey Epstein and his crimes.  




Former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told U.S. House lawmakers on Thursday that she had no knowledge of Jeffrey Epstein's or Ghislaine Maxwell's crimes at the start of two days of depositions that will also include former President Clinton.

“I had no idea about their criminal activities. I do not recall ever encountering Mr. Epstein," Hillary Clinton said in an opening statement she shared on social media.
The closed-door depositions in the Clintons' hometown of Chappaqua, a typically quiet hamlet north of New York City, come after months of tense back-and-forth between the former high-powered Democratic couple and the Republican-controlled House Oversight Committee. It will be the first time that a former president has been forced to testify before Congress.

Annie Karni (NEW YORK TIMES) notes that the deposition was paused when someone broke rules:

Representative Lauren Boebert of Colorado shared a photograph of Mrs. Clinton answering questions, which was posted on social media by Benny Johnson, a right-wing podcaster. Mrs. Clinton’s attorneys immediately asked to pause the proceedings, noting that the former secretary of state had been denied her request for a public hearing. The deposition resumed about 30 minutes later.

Was she drunk?  Boe-Boe?  She fell down after the State of the Union and some wondered if she was drunk then.  Was she drunk yesterday morning?  As well?   Her son got a misdemeanor citation for child abuse.  That was this month, by the way.  We're not talking about his 2025 issue for the same thing (he'll stand trial for that in April) or his 2024 arrest for property theft among other things.  Possibly Boe-Boe needs some time off to regroup? 



Representative Yassamin Ansari, Democrat of Arizona, also took a break to speak to reporters outside a performing arts center in Chappaqua, N.Y., where the House Oversight Committee investigating the Epstein matter has been taking a deposition from Hillary Clinton.  “We are sitting through an incredibly unserious clown show of a deposition,” she said, adding that Republicans in Congress were more concerned with getting photos of the closed proceeding out than “than holding anyone accountable.”


And it was pointless.  Hillary has no association with Jeffrey Epstein.  As she pointed out, the whole thing was a distraction from Donald Chump who does have a reason to be questioned -- under oath -- and his wife Melania who also has a reason to be questioned under oath.  Both Chumps are pictured repeatedly with Jeffrey Epstein and Ghislaine Maxwell, Melania has her e-mail to "G" that was released in the last document dump.  There are rumors that Epstein introduced Donald to Melania.  And that's before we get into the big news about the woman who complained to the FBI about Donald -- and how it was left out of the documents Pam Bondi released.  As Hillary noted in her opening statement -- which she posted in full on social media,  "Instead, you have compelled me to testify, fully aware that I have no knowledge that would assist your investigation, in order to distract attention from President Trump's actions and to cover them up despite legitimate calls for answers,"


Lawrence O'Donnell noted last night on MS NOW how Hillary called out this administration for covering up and for undercutting efforts to combat sex trafficking.  





House Democrats on Thursday demanded President Donald Trump follow the Clintons in testifying to congressional investigators on ties to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein.

Secretary of State Hillary Clinton began a closed-door deposition Thursday by a House panel investigating Epstein in Chappaqua in upstate New York, where she has a home with her husband, former President Bill Clinton, according to a person familiar with the proceedings. Bill Clinton is set to face questioning on Friday.

The House committee’s subpoena to a former president “sets a precedent,” Representative Robert Garcia, the panel’s top-ranking Democrat, told reporters gathered outside the local performing arts center where the panel is questioning the Clintons. 
“The person who actually appears more times in the files than the former president, who we want to speak with, is President Donald Trump,” Garcia told reporters.


Comer-Pyle, head of the US House Oversight Committee, managed to show up for this deposition -- he and the other Republican members of the committee bailed last week on Les Wexner's deposition.  He corn-poned himself but managed to attend. Prior to attending, Tom Durante (MEDIAITE) reports

Rep. James Comer (R-KY) was pressed by reporters about a possible Jeffrey Epstein cover-up by the Trump administration as he prepared to quiz former first lady and secretary of state Hillary Clinton on her ties to the notorious sex trafficker.

Speaking from Chappaqua, NY before the deposition was set to begin, Comer, the House Oversight Committee chair, was asked about a recent report that the Justice Department withheld dozens of pages from the Epstein document dump that mentioned President Donald Trump, including an allegation that he sexually abused a minor.
“We’re looking into the accusation by the NPR,” said Comer, who was flanked by fellow Reps. Lauren Boebert (R-CO), Nancy Mace (R-SC), Anna Paulina Luna (R-FL), and others. “We don’t know the answer to that. We know what the administration says. We’re still looking to to get a definitive answer on that.”

The NPR investigation, published on February 24, found over 50 pages that appear to have been catalogued, but were not a part of the massive trove of files related to Epstein.

The accusation by the NPR?  Comer-Pyle is an idiot.  



The Justice Department said Thursday that it is examining whether it wrongly withheld FBI files that contained allegations against President Donald Trump in its release of millions of pages from the investigatory files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Three summaries of interviews the FBI conducted in 2019 with a woman who had accused Trump of sexually assaulting her are missing from the files, multiple news outlets have reported. The woman had accused Trump of sexually assaulting her decades earlier while she was a minor. No evidence has emerged publicly to corroborate that accusation.
The existence of the summaries — known as 302s in law enforcement parlance — was noted in an index that the Justice Department included in the massive cache of files released over the past three months in response to the Epstein Files Transparency Act. The index suggested that law enforcement agents interviewed the woman on four occasions, writing up a summary in each instance. Only one of the four summaries was included in the release.

The summaries were among the materials prosecutors gave to defense attorneys as part of the discovery process leading up to the trial of Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell, who was convicted in 2021 on sex-trafficking charges.

Independent journalist Roger Sollenberger first reported on the apparent missing files.

The woman who accused Trump also said Epstein assaulted her when she was a minor in the 1980s. In an account that was included in the files, the woman said that Epstein introduced her to Trump and that Trump assaulted her.




Aaron Blake (CNN) observes the murky aspects of Chump and The Epstein Files:

Trump’s questionable denials

Speaking of Trump’s name being in the files, that’s one of several instances of him downplaying his proximity to Epstein using claims that were subsequently undermined or called into question:

  • Trump in July denied being told his name was in the files, shortly before we found out Attorney General Pam Bondi had indeed told him that back in May.
  • In 2019, he said that he “wasn’t a fan” of Epstein’s and added, “I knew him like everybody in Palm Beach knew him.” In fact, lots of evidence has suggested they were friendly before their falling out, including archived video footage and photos of them together uncovered by CNN’s KFile. The New York Times even reported Epstein once called Trump his “best friend.”
  • Trump in 2024 said he was “never on Epstein’s Plane,” despite flight logs showing he had been seven times in the 1990s.

His opaqueness

When Trump hasn’t made demonstrably false claims, he’s often been opaque:

  • He and his allies offered a number of claims for why Trump hadn’t written Epstein a lewd birthday letter published by the Wall Street Journal. While we don’t have proof that Trump authored the letter, the claims they used to deny it seemed to fall apart.
  • Trump in July seemed to reluctantly acknowledge he had known that Epstein accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell recruited their victim, Virginia Giuffre, from Mar-a-Lago. Trump previously avoided discussing why he and Epstein had a falling out, including saying in 2019: “The reason doesn’t make any difference, frankly.”
  • We then learned recently that Trump told a local police chief when Epstein was first under investigation in the mid-2000s that “everyone has known he’s been doing this.”

There have been other data points at least gesturing in the direction that Trump knew Epstein liked young women. But what he told local Florida police is perhaps the most compelling evidence yet that Trump knew something about Epstein’s crimes way back when.

White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt said she couldn’t confirm whether that conversation happened. She added that if it did, it “corroborates” Trump having called Epstein a “creep” and broken ties with him. But Trump has never been forthcoming about why he decided Epstein was a creep.

The Maxwell prison transfer

Shortly after she interviewed with Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche last summer, Maxwell was moved to a minimum-security prison camp.

You begin to see how that might look bad. Maxwell, after all, is a convicted sex offender. She was also saying things that could help Trump — even as he dangled a potential pardon.

But the administration spent months not explaining why the transfer occurred.

Eventually Blanche told NBC News shortly before Christmas that the Bureau of Prisons recommended the transfer, and he suggested he had signed off on it. Blanche said that Maxwell had been facing “numerous threats against her life.”

But in testimony earlier this month, Bondi said she hadn’t known about the transfer (despite being Blanche’s boss) and claimed Maxwell was transferred to “the same-level facility,” which doesn’t appear to be true.


The apparent cover up flies in the face of what Pam Bondi told -- shouted, sneered, screeched -- at the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month.  She drew attention to herself as she insisted there were no accusations against Donald Chump.  She had a fit when US House Rep Ted Lieu attempted to explore that avenue.  She lied to the committee.  Which is why Ted's office issued the following this week:

WASHINGTON - Today, Congressman Ted W. Lieu (D-Los Angeles County) and Congressman Dan Goldman (D-NY) sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche calling for the appointment of a special counsel to investigate Attorney General Pam Bondi for allegedly committing perjury during her February 11, 2026 testimony before the House Committee on the Judiciary when she said, “there is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.” Following the hearing, NPR reported that the Justice Department has withheld and removed some Epstein files related to Trump from the public database.

In the letter, the Members write:

Dear Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche,

As former prosecutors, we watched – along with millions of Americans – Attorney General Pam Bondi lie under oathbefore Congress. Testifying before a House Judiciary Committee hearing on February 11, 2026, Attorney GeneralBondi emphatically stated, “There is no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.” Yet a number of thedocuments from the Epstein files released to date by the Department of Justice directly contradict her statement.When confronted with her lie, she did not retract her statement, she doubled down. She stated, “Don’t you ever accuse me of committing a crime.”

 Attorney General Bondi committed the crime of making false statements under oath, under 18 U.S.C. § 1001. We request that you immediately appoint a special counsel to investigate Attorney General Bondi for committing perjury. America cannot have a liar and a criminal as our top law enforcement officer.

Donald Trump is all over the Epstein files released to date – which is only half of the total number of documents in your possession – referenced over 38,000 times. Below are just a few examples of the evidence released by the Department of Justice alleging that Trump committed crimes:

  • The DOJ released a 21-page internal slideshow presentation about investigations into Epstein. In it, there aretwo accusations against Donald Trump provided by two witnesses:

                        o  “[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to hisexposed penis which she subsequently bit. In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked herout. (Date range 1983-1985, [REDACTED] would have been 13-15).”

                             o  “[REDACTED] remember Epstein introduced her to Trump saying “this is a good one, huh” and Trumpresponded “Yes”. (Date range roughly 1984, [REDACTED] would have been 14).”

  • A separate FBI record reflects that an individual contacted the FBI’s National Threat Operations Centerreporting that, as a limo driver, he overheard Trump “continuously stated the name ‘Jeffrey’ while on the phone, and made references to “abusing some girl.” The individual also said he met a girl who said she was raped by Trump and Epstein.

  •  In July 2019, FBI interview transcripts released by the DOJ indicate that a witness expressed fear of retaliation when discussing individuals who were “well known” including “current United States President Donald Trump.”

These examples contradict her claim that there is “no evidence that Donald Trump has committed a crime.” Whenconfronted with one of these pieces of evidence, Attorney General Bondi doubled down instead of retracting her false statement. She also inappropriately and creepily spied on Members of Congress who were searching through the Epstein Files, so we know that she would have seen the documents that incriminated Trump. 

Further, it appears that the DOJ removed a document indicating that the underage accuser referenced above in the21-page internal slideshow was interviewed not once, but “at least four times” by the FBI.6 The removal of that document is not only suspicious, it raises obvious concerns about a coverup.

Moreover, both you and AG Bondi have stated that all of the survivors who have reached out to the Department have been able to provide testimony and evidence. As the country saw during

last week’s hearing, that is demonstrably false. Every survivor who attended that hearing indicated that they hadtried to meet with the Department and were rebuffed but would still be willing to provide evidence and testimony. Unless the Department is overtly covering up for President Trump or other child predators, we expect that theDepartment will meet with those survivors immediately.

Attorney General Bondi’s conduct meets all the elements of the crime of making false statements under oath. Sinceshe obviously isn’t going to prosecute herself, a clear conflict of interest exists.

Therefore, under 28 C.F.R. § 600.1, we request that you immediately appoint a special counsel to investigate Attorney General Pam Bondi for making false statements under oath during her February 11, 2026, testimony before the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this important matter. We look forward to receiving your response.

Sincerely,

READ THE FULL TEXT OF THE LETTER HERE




Now that everyone knows she lied, Democrats want answers. TAG24 NEWS notes:


Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer accused the Department of Justice, led by Attorney General Pam Bondi, of unlawfully withholding documents that could implicate or embarrass Trump, and pledged accountability for those responsible.

"Let me be blunt, there is a massive cover-up going on in the Justice Department to protect Donald Trump and people associated with Jeffrey Epstein," Schumer told reporters.
"As we expected, Trump, Bondi, and their minions have played games with the release of these files, released some documents they wanted to release, and continue to hide others...President Trump – what are you trying to hide?"


Multiple outlets and Democratic lawmakers have reported that the Department of Justice failed to release materials in Epstein files that documented FBI interviews with a female witness who alleged that Trump and disgraced pedophile Jeffrey Epstein sexually assaulted her when she was a minor.

The substance of the allegation against the president and its cover-up have broken through, as they should. It is absolutely surreal to say the president of the United States is an accused pedophile - and that our country's law enforcement apparatus, together with the Republican Party, seems intent on killing that story. Yet that is where we are.

The omitted FBI interviews with Trump's accuser are part of the tranche of Epstein files - documents in the federal government's possession related to its investigations of disgraced financier Epstein. Last year, Congress passed a bipartisan law requiring Department of Justice to release the files (subject to what are supposed to be narrow redactions, including of victims' names or material used in an ongoing federal investigation).
Of course, in any investigation, law enforcement receives junk tips that don't go anywhere. But there are several indications that the material the department is attempting to bury was viewed as serious.

For one thing, the witness who alleged Trump sexually assaulted her was interviewed by the FBI four times. If the witness wasn't credible, a second, third and fourth FBI interview probably wouldn't have been warranted. The witness interview was also memorialized in a 302, a form the FBI uses for documenting interviews with witnesses. Those documents, 302s, are significant investigative material - so much so that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche specifically instructed the Justice Department to flag 302s as they were reviewing the Epstein files.

Then there is the fact that the witness made a similar allegation (that she was sexually assaulted by Epstein and another prominent man) in litigation she filed in 2019. This witness - and their allegation against Trump - was also included in an internal department presentation that listed claims made against prominent individuals. So, again, this isn't someone who was being dismissed by people involved in the investigation.
The Justice Department has yet to release all of the Epstein files, even though the deadline to do so has already passed. But it's hard to imagine that, under Attorney General Pam Bondi's leadership, the department is investigating this allegation against Trump in light of all of the preferential treatment the president has received so far.


As Hillary said in her opening remarks to the Commitee:

A committee run by elected officials with a commitment to transparency would ensure the full release of all the files. It would ensure that the lawful redactions of those files protected the victims and survivors, not powerful men and political allies. It would get to the bottom of reports that DOJ withheld FBI interviews in which a survivor accuses President Trump of heinous crimes.



Howard Lutnick is one of the many people in the administration who had relationships with Jeffrey Epstein.   Lutnick, Robert Kennedy Jr., Doctor Oz, Stephen Feinberg, John Phelan, Kevin Warsh, Tom Barrack, Elon Musk, Steve Bannon, Melania Chump and Donald Chump all had ties to Epstein. 


None has been asked to testify before the committee.  And none has announced that they're stepping down.



Sarah K. Burris notes Lutnick may be wearing out his welcome:


So far, Secretary of Commerce Howard Lutnick has been able to score deals that make President Donald Trump happy. However, he's now alienated the rest of the powers that be.

According to Politico, politicians on both sides of the aisle are angry over Lutnick's name popping up in the investigation files around Jeffrey Epstein. Lutnick lived next to Epstein for a time, went to his home and to his private island with his family. He never engaged in anything untoward, he told reporters.
“He is thumbing a middle finger to anyone who thinks he’s on the outs because the president has really given a lot of his Cabinet the assurance that they’re not going anywhere until he wants them to go somewhere,” said one person close to the White House.

Other Cabinet-level officials don't like Lutnick's "style," the report said. And there are larger questions about how much Lutnick's children were profiting from his position in the Cabinet. Over the holidays, Trump confronted the secretary over the matter while at Mar-a-Lago.


House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer appears to be changing his tune on Howard Lutnick, now suggesting that it is "very possible" he might subpoena him after the Trump Commerce Secretary allegedly lied before Congress about the extent of his ties to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.
Just two weeks ago, MS NOW reported that Chairman Comer had dodged questions about subpoenaing Lutnick.

Asked at the time if his committee had any plans to subpoena the Commerce Secretary, Comer instead replied, "Well, we're going to try to get these five [witnesses] nailed down. We've got a lot of very important people we're trying to bring in to answer questions."

On Thursday, the question came up again, and Comer offered reporters a different perspective.

Asked if "in the spirit of bipartisanship" he would request Lutnick testify, Comer replied it was "very possible, and I think it's a good possibility his name will arise on some questioning today" as the Committee deposes former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.


The chairman’s suggestion that Lutnick could soon be facing a congressional subpoena comes after weeks of increased scrutiny of his relationship with Epstein, his onetime next-door neighbor in New York, after documents released by the Justice Department showed that he’d lied during an interview with the New York Post in October when he’d claimed to have cut off contact with Epstein after a 2005 encounter that he claimed had left him so unsettled that he’d vowed to “never be in the room with that disgusting person ever again.”


As Ben notes this morning on MEDIASNEWS NETWORK, photos emerged yesterday of Lutnick on Epstein's island, having the time of his life.  Years after he insisted he'd  broken with Epstein, years after the 'grossed out' moment he and his wife supposedly had when they visited their neighbor Epstein and saw things that turned their stomachs, things that made them both agree to never again have anything to do with Epstein. 


Let's note this from Senator Patty Murray's office:

Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator Patty Murray (D-WA), a senior member and the former chair on the Senate Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions (HELP) Committee, issued the following statement on the Trump administration’s moves to roll back worker protections. Today, the Trump nominee-packed National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) announced its decision to formalize the return of the first Trump administration’s joint employer rule. This coincides with this morning’s announcement from the Department of Labor of its intent to rescind the Biden Administration’s employee and independent contractor classification rule.

“Every day, little by little, the Trump administration is rigging the system to benefit giant corporations and shortchange workers—it’s an outright grift and working people should be furious. The joint employer rule is nothing more than a return to Trump’s anti-worker policies that let giant corporations skirt their basic obligations to employees—Trump is giving the biggest corporations cover to deny workers their ability to band together for better wages and working conditions and leaving millions of workers in the lurch, vulnerable to egregious violations of their rights.

“At the same time, today, the Trump administration announced they’re working to rescind the independent contractor rule. Trump wants to let giant corporations classify workers as contractors so that they don’t have to pay them minimum wage and overtime—these workers deserve fair pay.

“Under the Trump administration, giant corporations get giant tax breaks paid for by cutting Medicaid—the health care that the poorest workers are forced to rely on. Now, Trump wants those same corporations off the hook for every benefit, protection, and dollar they’d otherwise owe to millions of workers—it’s a shakedown. Republicans are proving time and again, they don’t care about workers—they don’t want to even let workers have crumbs, but billionaires can get trillions in tax breaks that will blow up our national debt. I am going to keep fighting for laws on the books that protect workers and build an economy that grows the middle-class, not just profit margins for the largest corporations on earth.”

Senator Murray has long led efforts in Congress to shield against employee misclassification and protect workers’ rights. In January of last year, Senator Murray forcefully condemned President Trump’s illegal firing of NLRB Member Gwynne Wilcox and the firing of Jennifer Abruzzo—Murray has consistently called for the immediate reinstatement of Wilcox and condemned Trump’s move as a breach of the NLRB’s independence. Senator Murray is fighting to pass—and is the original Senate author of—the Protecting the Right to Organize (PRO) Act, which, among other things, would close loopholes that allow employers to misclassify their employees and deny them protections under the law. Among many other pieces of pro-worker legislation, Murray also leads the Wage Theft Prevention and Wage Recovery Act, to fight wage theft and protect workers hard earned wages, and the Paycheck Fairness Act to combat wage discrimination and help close the pay gap, and has helped lead the fight for paid family and medical leave since she first joined Congress. Most recently, Senator Murray reintroduced her Bringing an End to Harassment by Enhancing Accountability and Rejecting Discrimination (BE HEARD) in the Workplace Actin response to Trump and Andrea Lucas, Chair of the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), eliminating workplace anti-harassment guidance and attacking transgender workers for using the locker rooms, bathrooms, and private spaces. BE HEARD takes critical steps to address workplace harassment, protects against discrimination based on gender identity and sexuality, and ensures workers can seek accountability and justice.

In December 2023, Senator Murray led 21 of her colleagues in a letter in support of the Biden Administration’s proposed rule to reinstate the joint-employer standard and she fought efforts to weaken the historic joint-employer standard under the previous administration at every step of the way. She continuously opposed the first Trump administration’s attempt to overturn the historic standard and led her colleagues in opposing its rule eroding the standard, which was finalized in 2020.

###


And we'll note this from THE BLACK COMMENTATOR:

Cover Story
The Rotunda Is Too Small for the Reverend Jesse Jackson
By Dr. Julianne Malveaux, PhD
BC Editorial Board

Click below to read issue 1076


Our email address is BlackCommentator@gmail.com

Our voicemail number is 856.823.1739




The following sites updated:





Wednesday, February 25, 2026

MAD TV?

Some of the stars of MADtv have reunited, taking to social media to share a glimpse of their time spent together.

Cast members Mo Collins, Alex Borstein, Debra Wilson, and Will Sasso could be seen in a photo posted to Instagram by Collins, who added the caption: "Look who I saw today!! Lucky me! Such a great day. I know this pic will make many of you happy too. 😊 #madtv"

The sketch comedy series — based on the long-running MAD Magazine — spoofed TV shows, movies, music videos and other pop-culture staples — aired from 1995 to 2009.

Some of the show's former cast members looked back at their long careers in a May 2025 episode of the TigerBelly podcast, hosted by MADtv alumnus Bobby Lee alongside his best friend Khalyla.

MAD TV?  Imagine if FOX had stood by it?  Or if it's brief run on THE CW had been extended?  It came back in 2016 for eight episodes.  And it was funny.  

In other news, Molly Sprayregen (LGBTQ NATION) reports:


Lesbian singer-songwriter Brandi Carlile held a benefit concert in Minneapolis on Saturday that raised $600,000 for families impacted by ICE’s occupation of the city.

“Last night was something I’ll never forget,” Carlile wrote Sunday on Instagram. “Minnesota is so deeply inspiring to me and the whole country. I can’t believe I got to sing for you and WITH you last night.”

“So many people came together to celebrate your strength and conviction,” the Grammy winner added, announcing the $600,000 raised.

“We made joyful and powerful noise!” she declared. 


Good for Brandi. 

Going out with C.I.'s "The Snapshot:"


Wednesday, February 25, 2026.  NPR and MS NOW uncover Pam Bondi's efforts to hide Epstein Files about Donald Chump, Pam's brother is on a lucky streak when it comes to his clients being pursued by the Justice Dept, Kristi Noem and her 'assistant' continue to garner attention, and much more. 

Let's start with the big news, Convicted Felon Donald Chump's actions have been covered up by Attorney General Pam da Bimbo Bondi.  Edith Olmsted (THE NEW REPUBLIC) reports:


The Department of Justice withheld multiple documents including allegations against President Donald Trump from its release of files on alleged sex trafficker Jeffrey Epstein, according to an investigation by NPR.

The Department of Justice failed to release documents relating to three interviews the FBI conducted between July and October 2019 with a woman who accused Trump of sexually assaulting her as a child. Only the first interview, conducted on July 24, 2019, is available to the public. In that conversation, she doesn’t mention Trump at all.
However, the woman’s allegations against the president still appeared in a 21-page slideshow included in files. “[REDACTED] stated Epstein introduced her to Trump who subsequently forced her head down to his exposed penis which she subsequently bit,” the FBI said. “In response, Trump punched her in the head and kicked her out.” This allegedly occurred in the mid-1980s when she was “approximately 13-15 years old.”

A record of the FBI interviews does appear in the files—on a list of discovery files given to Epstein’s accomplice Ghislaine Maxwell before her trial. By allowing Maxwell to retain information that the public does not have, Trump’s DOJ has enabled her to maintain potential blackmail over the president, according to independent journalist Roger Sollenberger.


On Tuesday morning, NPR published a stunning report on serial numbers and discovery logs that do not line up with what the Justice Department has posted online. Some of the missing materials relate to allegations involving President Donald Trump. The department declined to explain the discrepancies.

Congress ordered the release of these files. The DOJ controls the archive. Reporters compare internal catalog numbers to public postings and find gaps. The department offers assurances but no reconciliation of the record.

The allegations are grave — they involve claims of sexual abuse of minors — and they remain unproven. FBI case files contain interviews and leads that do not automatically translate into charges. That distinction matters, and it makes the integrity of the release process more important, not less.

The Epstein rollout has been ragged from the start. Victim names were exposed and then corrected. Documents were pulled down and reposted. Privacy reviews were cited. Deadlines were blamed. Now the public learns that dozens of pages reflected in official logs are not available for review. Even if each decision has an internal explanation, the outward picture is disorder in the execution of a congressionally mandated transparency law.
Disorder produces the same practical result as concealment. The public cannot tell what is complete, what is withheld, and why. The record becomes contestable. Accountability drifts.

Last week, I argued that the Epstein file rollout carried the feel of a cover-up because the public was being asked to trust a process it could not independently verify. NPR’s reporting moves that concern from instinct to documentation. When internal logs point to pages the public cannot see, the question stops being rhetorical and becomes procedural.

There is also a political fact that cannot be ignored: This is very clearly Donald Trump’s Justice Department. Attorney General Pam Bondi and Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche serve at his pleasure. The release process that now appears to shield him from clarity is being overseen by officials loyal to him. That reality demands a level of precision and documentation that leaves no room for doubt.

The Democrats on the House Oversight Committee issued the following statement:


For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating the FBI’s handling of allegations from 2019 of sexual assault on a minor made against President Donald Trump by a survivor.

Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor.

Covering up direct evidence of a potential assault by the President of the United States is the most serious possible crime in this White House cover up.

And the Democrats on the House Oversight Committee also issued this yesterday:

Washington, D.C. — Today, Rep. Robert Garcia, Ranking Member of the Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, released the following statement after it was exposed that the Department of Justice withheld and removed some Epstein files related to allegations that President Donald Trump sexually abused a minor, a violation of both the Oversight Committee’s subpoena and the Epstein Files Transparency Act.

“For the last few weeks, Oversight Democrats have been investigating the FBI’s handling of allegations from 2019 of sexual assault on a minor made against President Donald Trump by a survivor.

“Yesterday, I reviewed unredacted evidence logs at the Department of Justice. Oversight Democrats can confirm that the DOJ appears to have illegally withheld FBI interviews with this survivor who accused President Trump of heinous crimes. Oversight Democrats will open a parallel investigation into this.

Under the Oversight Committee’s subpoena and the Epstein Files Transparency Act, these records must immediately be shared with Congress and the American public. Covering up direct evidence of a potential assault by the President of the United States is the most serious possible crime in this White House cover up,” said Ranking Member Robert Garcia

###



The Department of Justice has withheld from public disclosure in its Epstein files database memos and notes about FBI interviews, including those of a woman who has alleged President Donald Trump sexually abused her when she was a minor, MS NOW reported Tuesday.

The woman, who was interviewed in July 2019 by the FBI about allegations against convicted sexual predator Jeffrey Epstein, alleged that "Trump forced her to perform oral sex on him 35 years ago, when she was 13 or 14 years old, and subsequently hit her," MS NOW reported, citing a source who has reviewed unredacted documents.
"That allegation appears in a 2025 PowerPoint presentation detailing each of the FBI's Epstein-related investigations and a spreadsheet of unconfirmed tips called into the bureau's National Threat Operations Center reviewed by MS NOW," the outlet reported. "MS NOW has found that of at least four interviews the FBI conducted with the woman related to the Epstein investigations, only one memo — and no handwritten notes — reflecting such an interview is included on the DOJ site."

MS NOW's report came hours after NPR first reported that the DOJ withheld from its public database of Epstein documents files related to allegations that Trump sexually abused a minor.

DOJ "also removed some documents from the public database where accusations against Jeffrey Epstein also mention Trump," NPR reported.


Appearing on CNN yesterday, US House Rep Jim Jordan played dumb -- the way he has over the sexual abuse scandal -- and insisted the Justice Dept had done nothing wrong. Elsewhere, the subject got the attention it deserves. 









Hours before President Trump’s State of the Union address on Tuesday, which is expected to include comments on immigration enforcement, 18 Roman Catholic bishops and archbishops from U.S. border regions issued a strongly worded statement urging Congress and the administration to make specific policy changes on the federal treatment of migrants.

Their list of demands includes honoring migrants’ right to apply for asylum at the border, protecting their access to sensitive locations like schools and houses of worship, keeping mixed-status families together, halting intimidating enforcement tactics like roving patrols and federal agents’ use of masks, and funding reintegration programs in deportees’ home countries.

“While we acknowledge the right and duty of a sovereign nation to enforce its laws, we also believe that those laws should be upheld in a manner that protects the God-given human dignity and rights of the human person,” the bishops wrote.
The signers included bishops from states that border Mexico and Canada — Texas, New Mexico, Washington, Michigan, California, and New York — as well as Rhode Island and Kentucky.

Similar appeals have failed to move the heart of the Secretary of Homeland Security Kristi Noem.  She is clearly to busy with her husband and her alleged lover to handle much -- certainly not her job duties.  Vrinda Mundara (SHOWBIZ CHEAT SHEET) ponders talk of her affair:


Undoubtedly, Kristi Noem, the Secretary of the Department of Homeland Security, is facing heavy scrutiny in news headlines due to the rumors of her alleged affair with former Trump aide Corey Lewandowski. However, there is a new addition in the same list. According to The List, Kristi Noem and her rumored lover Corey Lewandowski’s accidental disclosure of their affair in front of President Trump has stirred more drama.
The report states that Noem, 54, is not a stranger to controversies, so it is no longer surprising to the public that after the rumors of her alleged long-time affair with former Trump aide Corey Lewandowski became public, suddenly the politician is not taking any efforts to conceal or hide her rumored romantic fling with Corey Lewandowski, the chief of staff for Noem, under tight wraps despite the official reports of them being married to their respective partners being true.
A source, in a quote to the New York Post, has opened up about the same, explaining that the American President was feeling enraged and appalled after seeing how the duo were sharing a romantic moment while drinking from a single can of soda as a couple. After seeing the duo sharing a can of sparkling soda, Trump, in his raging and scathing tone, approached them and made a hard-hitting statement, stating that Noem and Corey can not indulge in this public display of affection because it is only becoming more evident and unavoidable, citing that now the news of their affair will become public and hard to hide.



A senior adviser to Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem is accused of entering the cockpit of a government jet during ascent and later firing a pilot over a missing personal item, according to two people familiar with the incident.

Corey Lewandowski, a "special government employee" who advises Noem, allegedly entered the cockpit uninvited while the aircraft was still climbing and below 10,000 feet, when pilots are expected to limit distractions. A U.S. Coast Guard aviation policy states that "no person shall engage in any conversation or activity that could distract or interfere with a flight crewmember properly conducting their assigned duties during critical phases of flight."
The Coast Guard operated the aircraft.

Lewandowski denied key elements of the account, telling Reuters that "there was never a conversation in the cockpit when the flight was taking off," and said the sources' description was wrong. He did not answer questions about whether he entered the cockpit during ascent.

According to the two sources, pilots asked Lewandowski to return to the cabin until cruising altitude. Later in the flight, they said, Lewandowski demanded to know who should be fired after Noem's blanket was missing following a plane change for technical reasons. The pilot reportedly accepted responsibility and was dismissed on the spot.

Coast Guard leadership later reinstated the pilot because he was needed for the return flight, the sources said.


Homeland Security lies and then lies again.  Over and over.  They lie about big things -- lying that someone rammed their vehicle, for example -- and they lie about small things.  They lie.  Over and over.  They lie to the courts, they lie to the people.  Edith Olmsted (THE NEW REPUBLIC) notes one lie that Kristi's been caught in:

Surprise, surprise: Homeland Security Kristi Noem completely made up that far-fetched story about deporting a cannibal, multiple federal law enforcement officials told The Intercept.
Speaking to Fox News’s Jesse Watters in June, Noem recounted a terrible tale she claimed to have heard from a U.S. air marshal about a cannibal who tried to “eat his own arms” while being deported out of the country. Noem later repeated the story as she and Donald Trump toured “Alligator Alcatraz,” the president’s wetland-themed concentration camp in the Florida Everglades.
At the time, the Department of Homeland Security and ICE wouldn’t respond to requests to confirm Noem’s story. Now multiple federal law enforcement officials—including one from the DHS—are saying it’s a lie, The Intercept reported Monday.

“That is completely made up,” a senior federal law enforcement official told The Intercept. “That never happened.”

[. . .]

Noem’s fake cannibal is just one of the many dangerous lies being peddled by DHS—as calls for her resignation continue to mount.





The Department of Homeland Security is threatening to put legal observers monitoring ICE activity on a domestic terrorist watchlist, according to a new lawsuit. 

Politico, citing the lawsuit, reports that DHS agents used facial recognition technology and license plate readers to monitor observers in Maine who were keeping tabs on federal immigration agents. The federal law enforcement officers would then threaten protesters. 
The lawsuit against the department and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem was filed Monday by two of those observers, Colleen Fagan and Elinor Hilton, who are hoping for an injunction that would stop the department from using the technology to threaten legal observers.

Hilton and Fagan allege that agents scanned their faces and license plates in two separate instances last month while they were recording ICE in Portland. In one occurrence, the lawsuit states that an agent told Hilton, “I hope you know that if you keep coming to things like this, you are going to be on a domestic terrorist watchlist. Then we’re going to come to your house later tonight.”

The lawsuit cited other Maine incidents documented in news articles, such as one ICE agent driving to a legal observer’s home and repeatedly honking their horn. Another time, a federal agent drove to the home of a protester and told her, “This is a warning. We know you live right here.”

Vic Verbalaitis (DAILY BEAST) notes in "ICE Barbie forced to scrap giant prison plan after uproar" that Kristi Noem will not be getting her immigration detention center in New Hampshire after all while Julia Ornedo's "White House blocks ICE Barbie and alleged lover’s travel chaos" (DAILY BEAST) notes,  "The White House was reportedly forced to step in after Kristi Noem and her alleged lover Corey Lewandowski cooked up a plan that briefly sent travelers into a panic."

"Our laws are clear.  You can refuse illegal orders.  No one has to carry out orders that violate the law or our Constitution."  Six members of Congress taped a PSA back in November explaining/reminding those serving in the military of that fact.  It is a fact.  Members of the military are trained in that reality.  Senators Mark Kelly and Elissa Slotkin and House of Representatives Jason Crow, Chris Deluzio, Maggie Goodlander and Chrissy Houlahan were the six lawmakers.  They angered Donald Chump -- who lied that it was sedition -- and his boy toy Prissy Pete Hegseth.  Hegseth, it should be noted, had made similar statements when he was on FOX "NEWS."  Wasn't a problem to us here because we know the law.  But Pete Hegseth is a liar and a goon (and a gooner) so he doesn't care what's legal and what's not.  Gregory Wallance (THE HILL) observed yesterday, "The video did not urge any specific command or servicemember to disobey any specific order.  The video only restated the Uniform Code of Military Justice, which in fact requires servicemembers to disobey manifestly illegal orders. The Democrats arguably were acting in their capacity as elected officials with oversight responsibility for the military."


There are two outcomes this week.  Nia Prater (THE INTELLIGENCER) notes:


Jeanine Pirro’s tenure leading the U.S. attorney’s office in Washington, D.C., has been marked by a poor record in court. The former judge and onetime Fox News host has seen several cases she has brought against protesters and other anti-Trump figures fall apart in front of grand juries, including a well-publicized failure to indict a resident for hurling a sandwich at a federal agent stationed in the capital city last year.
Now, following another one of those setbacks, her office is reportedly dropping its pursuit of a group of Democratic members of Congress whom President Donald Trump has accused of treason. Sources tell NBC News that the U.S. attorney will stop seeking legal action against the six Democratic lawmakers who filmed a video urging members of the military and the nation’s intelligence community to refuse illegal orders, in a clear shot at Trump and his administration.
The reported move comes just weeks after a federal grand jury in Washington, D.C., rejected Pirro’s efforts to obtain an indictment against the Democrats, a once rare occurrence that has become common during Trump’s second term.

So that's Pirro learning to read the room.  Hegseth's too busy huffing males to read the room.  Leo Shane III, Connor O'Brien and Kyle Cheney (POLITICO) report

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth on Tuesday ramped up his public spat with Sen. Mark Kelly, appealing a federal court ruling that blocked him from punishing the Arizona Democrat for advising troops not to follow illegal orders.

The case, filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia, asks a panel to set aside the ruling this month from U.S. District Judge Richard Leon, who issued a preliminary injunction halting the Pentagon’s effort to demote the former Navy captain and reduce his retirement pay.
The move reveals that Hegseth has no plans to tamp down his battle against Kelly, a potential 2028 presidential contender who has fought the allegations against him as a threat to free speech.

Attorney General Pam da Bimbo Bondi is burying Epstein files.  She's also accused of helping her brother's clients.  Russell Payne (SALON) reports:

With the Department of Justice embroiled in criticism over its handling of files related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, Attorney General Pam Bondi is facing renewed questions over her brother, Brad Bondi, and his unusual winning streak in cases involving the DOJ.
In recent months, the department has faced questions about whether it has “properly implemented firewalls and screening procedures to separate Attorney General Bondi from her brother,” per a letter sent by members of Congress in December.

In the letter, lawmakers detail recent cases in which Brad Bondi has been able to achieve favorable outcomes for his clients, even those facing long odds, in their case. For example, Bondi served as the lead attorney for billionaire Trevor Milton, who was convicted of defrauding investors in 2022, in a scheme in which Milton made misleading statements targeting “retail investors.” For this, Milton was sentenced to four years in prison — however, President Donald Trump pardoned Milton in March 2025.

Lawmakers have also questioned the circumstances of two cases from last summer that the DOJ dropped after Brad Bondi joined the legal team of the defense. In August, the DOJ dropped charges against developer Sid Chakraverty, who was accused of wire fraud and lying to secure favorable tax incentives. This came only weeks after Brad Bondi joined Chakraverty’s legal team, though Chakraverty claims that Bondi had been working on the case in an unofficial capacity since before the 2024 election.
A similar situation played out in the case of Carolina Amesty, a former Florida state House Republican, accused of fraudulently obtaining $122,000 of small business loans during the COVID-19 pandemic. The U.S. attorney on the case, Gregory Kehoe, however, requested that the case be dismissed, without providing a reason, shortly after Brad Bondi joined Amesty’s legal team. Bondi was hired shortly after the 2024 election and after Trump made clear his intention to nominate Pam Bondi as attorney general.


Convicted Felon Donald Chump gave a rambling, meandering, hate filled speech last night.  We're not wasting time on that but we will note this from Senator Adam Schiff's office;
 

Schiff: “Tonight [Trump] will claim credit for successes he did not achieve and deny responsibility for crises that he created. And he will tell us America has never been greater. But the American people deserve the truth.”

Washington, D.C. – Today, U.S. Senator Adam Schiff (D-Calif.) delivered a prebuttal address on the Senate floor ahead of the State of the Union, calling out how President Trump has not just failed to improve the state of our union, but has actively degraded it.  

In his remarks, Schiff enumerated ten ways the president has torn down our nation: denigrating our allies and alliances; undermining truth, science, education, and expertise; sabotaging climate and energy stability; making America less safe at home; politicizing and weaponizing government institutions; cutting funding to health and research institutions; eroding the rule of law; destroying health care; driving economic instability and the affordability crisis; and deepening division and social breakdown. Schiff pushed Americans not to accept this path of our failing nation, arguing that we have power to organize, vote, and speak the truth, and the power to fight for a more perfect union.  

“It depends on you. On me. Every single one of us. The work is hard. The progress is slow. The discouragement is real. But so is the possibility. So is the promise. So is the extraordinary, improbable, beautiful experiment that is America – if we have the courage to believe in it again, and the determination to make it real. The pursuit of a more perfect union has to continue. It must. And it continues with us,” said Senator Schiff.  

Watch his full speech HERE. Download remarks HERE. 

On how President Trump has divided our nation:  

[…] He has taken a diverse, complicated, and sometimes fractious country – which has always been diverse, complicated, and sometimes fractious – and instead of trying to unite it, he has done more than anyone else in our history to break it apart. He governs through fear and scapegoating. Immigrants are “invaders.” Vulnerable kids are a “lie.” Political opponents are “enemies from within.” The media is “fake news.” Anyone who disagrees with him is a traitor […] The basic trust that allows democracy to function – the assumption that even when we disagree, we share certain values and commitments – is coming apart. I’ve been in public service long enough to remember when Democrats and Republicans could team up with each other, without suffering political attack. When we could disagree without questioning each other’s patriotism or humanity. When we could make progress, on matters big and small. 

On channeling our collective power to hold the President accountable:  

[…] Tonight, the President will try to convince you that everything is fine. I’m asking you to trust your own eyes. To trust your own experience. To trust the evidence. And then I’m asking you to trust something else: Your own power. The power to organize. To vote. To speak truth. To run for office. To hold leaders accountable. The power to look at what we’ve lost and decide we’re going to fight with everything we have to get it back. Because a more perfect union doesn’t depend on any one person or President – as much as he may want it to.  

On how Trump has drove up everyday costs:  

[..] The President promised to bring down inflation. Instead, his tariffs have made it worse. And it’s not just the tariffs. The tax cuts to rich people and corporations have exploded the deficit. Regulatory rollbacks have boosted corporate profits while creating long-term risks. Attacks on the Federal Reserve’s independence have undermined the nation’s economy and driven prices higher. Trump promised to bring back manufacturing jobs — we have lost them. He promised to bring down inflation — it has gone up. He promised to reduce the trade deficit — it has reached a record high. Americans literally cannot afford three more years of this. 

Read the transcript of his remarks as delivered below: 

Tonight, just down the hall, the President will stand before Congress and the American people.  

He will paint a picture of strength, prosperity, and national renewal. He will claim credit for successes he did not achieve and deny responsibility for crises that he created. And he will tell us that America has never been greater. 

But the American people deserve the truth. And the truth is that over the past year, we have not moved closer to forming “a more perfect union” – tragically it is quite the opposite. Our disunion has only grown. Our founders understood something when they chose the words: “A more perfect union…” They didn’t contemplate achieving perfection. They envisioned something more realistic, more achievable — the pursuit of a more perfect union. A constant effort to push the country forward. A grinding, slow, and sometimes painful process. They recognized that America is not a finished product but a beautiful, ongoing experiment in self-governance that requires hard work and constant perseverance.  

For 250 years, through wars and depressions, through slavery and Jim Crow, through periods of bitter division and hard-won reconciliation, Americans have honored our founder’s intention. And moved the nation forward. We have stumbled. We have fallen short. And at times we have failed to live up to our promise. 

But we have always — eventually – bent the arc of our own national story towards justice, towards fairness, towards a more perfect union. 

And yet, from the moment he inflicted himself on our public life, Donald Trump has done everything possible to reverse that progress. By design it appears, by virtue of the product of some defect of character, perhaps, but in every way he can, in every moment he can, he has sought to divide us.  

Today, in fewer words than the President will use tonight, I want to talk about some of the ways that President Trump has not just failed to advance our union — but done so much to bring about our disunion. 

Denigrating Our Allies and Alliances 

Now, I’ve served in our Capitol for over two decades.  

And I have visited the capitals of our friends and some of our adversaries across the world.  

I have seen firsthand that—notwithstanding our possession of the strongest and most courageous military in the world—America’s greatest strategic asset isn’t the might of our arms, or the size of our aircraft carriers.  

It is the strength of the alliances around the world.  

The web of partnerships we built after World War II – NATO, our Pacific alliances, our hemispheric relationships – they are force multipliers. They help us keep the peace. 

They are the reason that a nation of 340 million people can project power and values across a globe of more than 8 billion. 

Yet, tragically, President Trump has systematically taken apart the advantage these allies give us. 

He has insulted the leaders of Canada, Germany, France, and the United Kingdom — our closest democratic allies — not to mention countries like Denmark. 

He has questioned whether America would defend NATO members under Article 5, the collective defense provision that has kept most of Europe peaceful for 75 years.  

He has treated longstanding security commitments as protection rackets, demanding payment as if our allies were vassal states rather than partners. 

And he has done all this while praising Viktor Orbán, Vladimir Putin, Xi Jinping and other dictators.   

The result?  

Our allies don’t trust us. And our most powerful adversaries don’t fear us.  

And that makes every American less safe. 

When the next crisis comes – and it will come, and it may even be caused by this president – we will find ourselves isolated in ways that would have been unthinkable just a few years ago. 

This weakens and endangers our union. 

Undermining Truth, Science, Education, and Expertise 

But the power of our union isn’t just about the strength of our military or ties abroad. It is also about the strength of our intellect here at home. 

I find myself thinking about an exchange from the television series on Chernobyl.  

A scientist tells a Soviet bureaucrat, “Every lie we tell incurs a debt to the truth. Sooner or later, that debt is paid.” 

This administration has run up a debt to the truth that will take generations to repay. 

Over the last several years, the President of the United States has suggested that people inject bleach to cure COVID-19, that windmills cause cancer, that climate change is a hoax invented by China, that Tylenol use in pregnancy causes autism. The list goes on and on.   

And over this past year, we have seen systematic attacks on scientists at the CDC, NOAA, the EPA, and the NIH – career professionals driven from public service for the apparent crime of publishing findings the President doesn’t like. 

DOGE-d for speaking truth to power. For respecting facts and science, or simply, seemingly, and perversely in this cruelest of administrations — fired for the apparent “fun” of it.  

We have seen university researchers lose federal funding not because their work lacks merit, but because their conclusions contradict preferred political narratives. 

We have seen attacks on vaccines and changes to our public health system that have caused needless outbreaks of disease. This President has most assuredly not Made America Great Again, but he has managed to Make Measles Great Again. 

And when experts gently try to correct these falsehoods, they are attacked, doxxed, and threatened. 

This is part of a deliberate cultivation of ignorance as a political strategy. 

When you undermine expertise, when you treat all opinions as equally valid regardless of evidence, when you replace scientists with sycophants – you make people vulnerable to con artists and demagogues. 

You make democracy itself impossible, because democracy requires an informed citizenry capable of distinguishing truth from lies. 

The debt to the truth will come due.  

And when it does, our country will pay an enormous price. 

Slowing Renewable Energy and Speeding Climate Change 

Just more than a year ago, Los Angeles County faced one of the most destructive disasters in the nation’s history. 

Entire neighborhoods – torched and torn apart by wildfires the magnitude of which we have not seen on the suburban streets of the Southland. 

This loss – of loved ones, of homes and businesses, of precious memories — all gone in mere moments, still weighs heavy upon us. 

Since then, I have talked to survivors of those fires who have gone on to rebuild, only to see their insurance coverage dropped – with worsening drought and prolonged dry seasons, insurance companies are refusing to cover the same homes and businesses they covered just a few years ago.  

They are seeing, what we are seeing, that this may not be the last of these tragedies in our hills in our lifetimes.  

This is the climate crisis in human terms. And this administration’s response has been to make it catastrophically worse. 

President Trump has rolled back fuel efficiency standards, withdrawn from international climate agreements, opened pristine federal lands to more drilling, and—as we saw with last week’s repeal of what’s known as the “endangerment finding” —gutted the EPA’s authority to regulate carbon emissions.  

A New York Times headline last month actually read: “E.P.A. to Stop Considering Lives Saved When Setting Rules on Air Pollution.” It sounds like parody, but sadly these destructive efforts are real. 

All of this while summers grow hotter, some winters grow colder, wildfires rage, hurricanes intensify, and insurance markets collapse. 

The President calls this “energy dominance.”  

But dominance over what? The laws of physics? The carbon cycle? 

Here’s what is actually happening:  

We’re sacrificing long-term prosperity for short-term profit.  

We’re driving up costs for American families through higher insurance premiums, higher food prices, and higher disaster recovery expenses. 

We’re ceding global leadership in clean energy and technology – the defining economic opportunity of the 21st century – to China and to Europe. 

And we’re doing it all while pretending that the house isn’t on fire. 

Angelinos know better.  

So do millions of Americans living through droughts, floods, and heat waves that would have been impossible a generation ago. The climate doesn’t care about your politics. 

The debt comes due whether you believe it or not. 

Making Our Communities Less Safe 

Our changing climate is not the only threat our communities face in Donald Trump’s America. 

In the aftermath of January 6th, 2021, there was a brief moment when Americans of all political persuasions condemned political violence.  

The attack on the Capitol was so brazen, so shocking, that even some of the President’s allies momentarily found their moral bearings and said, “Count me out.” 

That moment has clearly passed. 

We now have a President who has pardoned January 6th rioters, calling them “patriots” and brought them into his administration, including one caught shouting “kill ‘em” at police officers that day. 

We have an administration that treats white nationalist extremism as a core competency in the hiring process. 

And an administration that focuses federal law enforcement resources not on violent offenders, but on prosecuting political opponents, unleashing masked ICE on innocent people and deporting children and grandmothers. 

At the same time, we have seen the gutting of public health infrastructure that was built over decades to protect Americans from pandemics.  

We have seen emergency preparedness budgets slashed and the people who ran them driven out of government. 

The message is clear: If you’re a violent extremist who supports the President, you get a pardon. But if you’re a public health official who takes your job seriously, you get a pink slip. 

This makes Americans less safe from terrorism, from disease, from domestic threats that don’t care about party affiliation.  

Security and attacks against police officers aren’t partisan issues — or at least they shouldn’t be. 

But when the President treats loyalty as more important than competence, when he treats protection as something selectively offered to supporters rather than universally provided to the people— he fundamentally misunderstands the first duty of government.  

And the need to protect the public is certainly not the only thing he misunderstands.   

Politicizing and Weaponizing Government Institutions 

From the birth of our nation, our Founders were obsessed with preventing tyranny and the emergence of another king, another despot.  

They created checks and balances, separation of powers, an independent judiciary.  

They understood that the greatest threat to liberty wasn’t foreign invasion – it was the concentration of power in the hands of one person or faction. 

This President has systematically dismantled these safeguards in his second term. 

The Justice Department is supposed to be independent, pursuing justice without fear or favor.  

But under this administration, it has become an instrument of presidential revenge, a sword and shield for the president, launching investigations of critics and dropping cases against allies. 

His Justice Department, and I say “his” because it no longer represents the public or justice, and is run by his former criminal defense lawyers represents only his personal interests, sought to indict two of my Senate colleagues for stating the plain truth that members of the military may refuse an illegal order, indeed they have a duty to do so.  

Their oath, after all, is to the Constitution, not to the person of the president.  

It is difficult to overstate what an abuse of power the pursuit of that indictment represents; the effort to jail one’s opposition is a hallmark of a dictatorship, not democracy.  

Career civil servants from all across the federal government – people who have served under both Republican and Democratic administrations with professionalism and integrity – are being purged for insufficient loyalty to the person of the president.  

Inspectors General who uncover wrongdoing and expose corruption are fired. Whistleblowers intimidated. 

We are witnessing the conversion of the federal government from a public trust into a personal fiefdom. 

And here’s the thing that should terrify every American, regardless of party. 

Once these norms are broken, they are immensely difficult to restore.  

Once you establish that a President can use the Justice Department to punish enemies, every future President will face that temptation. Pressure, even. 

Once you establish that civil servants must demonstrate personal loyalty rather than professional competence, you’ve replaced the rule of law with the rule of one. 

The Founders warned us about this. Their pursuit of a more perfect union was dependent upon a calculated departure from consolidated power. 

Now we are living the fears of our Founders. And seeing that threat expand rapidly. 

Triggering a Brain Drain 

With the President’s weaponization of our institutions comes a parallel, equally disturbing trend.  

America has always had a secret weapon in global competition:  

We attract the best and the brightest from around the world.  

Nobel Prize winners, startup founders, groundbreaking researchers – they come here because America offers something unique: 

Freedom, funding, and the belief in science. The ultimate intellectual melting pot. That’s being attacked on a daily basis. 

This administration has slashed funding for the National Science Foundation, the National Institutes of Health, and the Department of Energy’s research programs.  

It has attacked universities as “indoctrination centers.”  

It has made it harder for foreign students to get visas or stay after graduation and start a business. 

I’ve spoken with researchers at Caltech, UCLA, Stanford, you name it – world-class institutions in my state.  

They tell me the same story: Graduate students from abroad are choosing to study in Europe or Canada. Even China. Postdocs are leaving.  

Even American-born scientists are considering opportunities elsewhere, because they can’t count on research funding, because they’re tired of political attacks, because they don’t want to work in an environment where basic facts are treated with partisan hostility.  

America is now for the first time losing the race for talent.  

And in a knowledge economy, talent is everything. 

China isn’t attacking its scientists. 

Europe isn’t defunding its research universities.  

They’re doing the opposite – because they understand what this administration apparently doesn’t: The future belongs to nations that invest in intellectual and creative talent, not to the nations that drive it away. 

When the next breakthrough treatments, the next transformative technologies, the next generation of innovation comes from Shanghai or Berlin instead of San Francisco or Boston, we will know why and who is responsible.  

Attacking the Rule of Law 

 In 1783 George Washington wrote: “If men are to be precluded from offering their sentiments on a matter, which may involve the most serious and alarming consequences… reason is of no use to us; the freedom of speech may be taken away, and dumb and silent we may be led, like sheep, to the slaughter.” 

Washington understood that the rule of law – the principle that no one, not even the President, is above the law – is fundamentally what separates democracy from despotism. 

President Trump has spent his whole career evading the rule of law. 

He has refused to comply with congressional subpoenas.  

He has ignored court orders.  

He has pardoned co-conspirators and dangled pardons in brazen attempts at witness tampering. 

He has attacked judges who rule against him as “biased” or “partisan.”  

He has called for the prosecution of political opponents without evidence.  

He has treated the justice system not as a neutral arbiter but as a weapon to be captured and wielded. 

And increasingly, he’s succeeding. 

We have seen this partisan and dangerous Supreme Court grant presidents sweeping immunity from prosecution.  

We have seen judges appointed based on loyalty rather than jurisprudence.  

We have seen the normalization of conduct that, in any previous administration, would have been utterly disqualifying. 

After two and a half centuries of American life, we came to believe that the rule of law was so well entrenched in this country as to be sacrosanct. Beyond reproach or repeal.  

We were wrong. 

It depends on norms, on shame even, on the willingness of the people in power to accept limits on that power.  

When those restraints disappear, when corruption becomes routine and impunity becomes expected – the republic is in deep danger. 

Cutting off Access to Health Care 

The health of our democracy is at risk. But so to is the health of our nation. 

Let me tell you about a constituent of mine. Her name is Catherine. She wrote to me last November. 

She shared that as a retired teacher, earlier in her career, when she was working, she had trouble getting health insurance – because she had a pre-existing condition that made insurance unobtainable for her, until we passed the Affordable Care Act.  

The ACA changed that. It literally saved her life. 

Now, the President is trying to dismantle the ACA again. The big ugly bill [failed to extend] its tax credits and took a trillion dollars from Medicaid to give rich in the country a tax cut.  

He’s systematically attacked the health care system Americans rely on, to give more tax breaks for large corporations.  

And all the while, he’s driving up costs — all so he can claim the system is broken and he can privatize it. 

It is not hard to see.  

This is the pattern with this administration:  

Promise relief, deliver crisis.  

Promise lower costs, but drive them up.  

Promise to protect people, then cut their care. 

But those broken promises will also mean shattered families, deeper uncertainty, and an America that is sicker and poorer. 

This is what is happening to Catherine right now. She is on a fixed income, roughly $45,000 a year – with a house payment and two kids in college. 

Because of the Big Ugly Bill’s failure to extend the ACA tax credits, her premium has gone up $800 this year. $800 a month, nearly $10,000 a over the course of the year. Almost a quarter of her annual income. 

She has relied on the goodwill of her neighbors, and of her local hospital. 

But her words still ring in my ear. 

“I am not going to make do. I don’t know what I’m going to do.” 

Making the Economy Work for the Rich and Only the Rich 

In Trump’s America, the economy of opportunity is only for those on the inside – the billionaires and big corporations that can afford to donate to Donald Trump’s ballroom, buy his meme coins, or pay a million dollars to stand at his side while he takes the oath of office or celebrates the 250th anniversary of the nation. 

And the rest? Let them eat the cost of mounting tariffs. 

Remember when President Trump said trade wars were going to be “easy to win”? 

How’s that working out for us? 

Tariffs – which are taxes on American consumers, not on foreign countries – have driven up the cost of everything from groceries to electronics.  

Retaliatory tariffs from other countries have devastated American farmers and manufacturers. And he is fighting a court decision that should force him to pay those taxes back to the people. Business investment has stalled because no one knows what the rules will be from one month to the next. 

The President promised to bring down inflation. 

Instead, his tariffs have made it worse.  

And it’s not just the tariffs. 

The tax cuts to rich people and corporations have exploded the deficit. 

Regulatory rollbacks have boosted corporate profits while creating long-term risks.  

Attacks on the Federal Reserve’s independence have undermined the nation’s economy and driven prices higher. 

Trump promised to bring back manufacturing jobs — we have lost them. He promised to bring down inflation — it has gone up. He promised to reduce the trade deficit — it has reached a record high. 

Americans literally cannot afford three more years of this. 

Tearing the Country Apart 

Which brings me to the heart of the matter.  

He has taken a diverse, complicated, and sometimes fractious country – which has always been diverse, complicated, and sometimes fractious – and instead of trying to unite it, he has done more than anyone else in our history to break it apart. 

He governs through fear and scapegoating. 

Immigrants are “invaders.” 

Vulnerable kids are a “lie.” 

Political opponents are “enemies from within.” 

The media is “fake news.” 

Anyone who disagrees with him is a traitor. 

Think about what that has meant for all of us. What it’s meant for you. 

There are family members who are no longer speaking to one another. 

Friendships that have ended. 

Communities are turning inward, and turning on each other. 

The basic trust that allows democracy to function – the assumption that even when we disagree, we share certain values and commitments – is coming apart. 

I’ve been in public service long enough to remember when Democrats and Republicans could team up with each other, without suffering political attack.  

When we could disagree without questioning each other’s patriotism or humanity. 

When we could make progress, on matters big and small. 

That world has grown really small indeed, in no small part because of this President. 

The great tragedy, of course, is that America has real challenges that require real solutions.  

The cost of everyday life. Housing and health care. Education and energy costs. Infrastructure and the imminent challenges of the climate crisis. 

These are hard problems, and reasonable people can disagree with how to solve them. 

But we can’t solve them – or prepare for the problems of the future – if we can’t talk to each other.  

We can’t solve them if we treat politics as warfare rather than negotiation. 

We can’t solve them if the President of the United States purports to love America but spends all his time attacking Americans.  

A house divided against itself cannot stand. Lincoln said that. 

It was true then. It is true now. 

So, tonight President Trump will deliver his State of the Union address. He will claim that  

America is strong, prosperous, and united. 

But sadly, he has made us weaker abroad, more divided at home, less trusted, less prosperous, less safe, and less free than when he took office. 

The state of our union now is not strong, thanks to him.  

It’s fragile. 

Deeply, deeply fragile. 

But we cannot forget that fragility is not the same as frailty. 

We’ve been broken before and found ways to mend ourselves. 

We’ve lost our way before and found, somehow, the courage to chart a new course. 

We have forgotten our highest ideals before –and yet always, eventually remember who we are. 

We cannot think of “a more perfect union” as a destination. 

“A more perfect union” is a direction. 

It’s the choice we make, generation after generation, to see each other not as enemies but as friends. 

As partners in the boldest experiment in democracy that the world has known.  

It’s the work of building longer bridges instead of higher walls – between parties, between communities, between the America we are and the America we could be. 

It’s the recognition that our nation’s diversity isn’t our weakness – it’s the very source of our strength, our creativity, our resilience. 

A more perfect union means families who don’t go bankrupt because someone got sick.   

It means kids who can breathe clean air and inherit a livable planet. 

It means immigrants being welcomed for their contributions, not vilified for their origins. 

It means learning from our history and charting a more equitable course for the future. 

It means justice that applies equally to the powerful and the powerless. 

It means scientists free to pursue truth without fear. 

It means alliances that multiply our influence instead of isolation that diminishes it. 

It means an America where disagreement doesn’t mean demonization, where debate doesn’t mean destruction, where we can be fierce advocates for our beliefs while still recognizing the humanity in those who disagree. 

None of that is easy. And if the last ten years of American life are any evidence – none of that is guaranteed. 

The Constitution gives us the tools, but we have to do the job.  

The Founders lit the flame, but we have to keep it burning. 

They started the work, and we must continue it. 

Tonight, the President will try to convince you that everything is fine.  

I’m asking you to trust your own eyes. To trust your own experience. To trust the evidence. 

And then I’m asking you to trust something else: Your own power. The power to organize. To vote. To speak truth. To run for office. To hold leaders accountable. The power to look at what we’ve lost and decide we’re going to fight with everything we have to get it back. 

Because a more perfect union doesn’t depend on any one person or President – as much as he may want it to. 

It depends on teachers who refuse to teach lies. 

It depends on students who refuse to abandon their dreams. 

It depends on journalists who refuse to stop asking questions. 

On scientists who refuse to abandon facts.  

On neighbors who refuse to turn against each other.  

On Americans who refuse to accept that this is as good as it gets. 

It depends on you. On me. Every single one of us. 

The work is hard. The progress is slow. The discouragement is real. 

But so is the possibility. 

So is the promise. 

So is the extraordinary, improbable, beautiful experiment that is America – if we have the courage to believe in it again, and the determination to make it real. 

The pursuit of a more perfect union has to continue. It must. 

And it continues with us.  

###



The following sites updated: