Yes, gimmie my money back, I want my money back.
Danny Boyle has taken a notion of whimsy and stretched it out to film length. He's padded it with stale talk but never appeared to have grasped that a film might do well to have an actual plot and not just a whimsical concept.
It's as though Penny Marshall had been content to have Tom Hanks wake up in an adult's body in BIG and then have the movie end there -- no effort to bring in romance or any other events.
Over and over, the not-so-funny joke is that we now live in a world where everyone except for one man has forgotten the Beatles allowing this one man to present "Yesterday," "All You Need Is Love," "Let It Be," "Something," "I Saw Her Standing There," "A Day In The Life," "Carry That Weight," "Here Comes The Sun," "In My Life," "Help," "Hey Jude," etc as his own songs.
At its best, the film is dull. At its worst, it's insipid.
Mainly it testifies to how success can destroy a director.
Like Steven Spielberg before him, Danny Boyle gets more and more fey and twinkley with each passing film. At this point, he's basically a munchkin with outstretched arms beseeching the world, "Hug me!"
Gone are the inspired moments of TRAINSPOTTING and SHALLOW GRAVE that truly grabbed a viewer. Even the lumbering and mixed results of THE BEACH are preferred to the manufactured candy of SLUMDOG MILLIONAIRE, STEVE JOBS and especially T2.
He had promise but that promise was based upon connecting to the audience. He no longer speaks to an audience, he lectures them.
I was pulling for this film, for anything that wasn't a superhero movie, actually, to be a big office winner and, hopefully, return us to adult films. There's nothing grown up or mature about YESTERDAY except for cold calculations as the director tries to mechanically push your buttons.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"
Friday, June 28, 2019. The second debate takes place and Joe Biden plays the ghoul.
20 of the 25 candidates seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination have participated in Wednesday and Thursday's debates: US House Rep and Iraq War veteran Tulsi Gabbard, former US House Rep Beto O'Rourke, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Amy Klobuchar, Senator Cory Booker, US House Rep Tim Ryan, former US House Rep John Delaney, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, Governor Jay Inslee, former HUD Secretary Julian Castro, former US Senator and Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Bernie Sanders, Marianne Williamson, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Kamala Harris, US House Rep Eric Swalwell, Andrew Yang, Senator Michael Bennet, John Hickenlooper and South Ben Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
The clear winners?
Women.
All six women demonstrated leadership and spoke to real issues. Three e-mails felt that 'winners and losers' were in some way lessening the debate. Yeah, I read the headlines on some of that garbage passed off as 'critiques.' For those in the press who've apparently suffered head injuries, let's be really clear: A 'debate' that limits the participants to one minute responses and possibly a 30 second follow up is never going to be a debate. It's speed dating at best.
All you're going to be able to do with that format is determine whether or not the person appears ready for the White House.
All the women -- Tulsi, Elizabeth, Marianne, Kisten, Amy and Kamala -- passed that test.
Now each one has their own issues and agenda and you may or may not support those. But in terms of showing presidential merit, all women succeeded.
Why didn't the men?
There were so many failures and they were the men. With six women participating, that left fourteen men. There were over twice as many men as women on the stage both nights. But the bulk of the men were embarrassments. They didn't just come off poorly, they were embarrassments.
Is Tim Ryan really qualified to be president of the United States if he doesn't know who attacked on 9/11? Is Tim Ryan really qualified if he doesn't know who al Qaeda is?
That's the sort of mistake that should end a campaign immediately.
Women didn't make that mistake on the stage -- in fact, it was Tulsi who corrected Tim and corrected the record.
Tim Ryan's not the only guy that was an embarrassment.
Enter Joe Biden.
Look, Donald Trump has put us in a horrible situation. We do have enormous income inequality and one thing I agree honestly can make massive cuts in the $1.6 trillion in tax loopholes out there and I would be going about eliminating Donald Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy.
He declared that last night. He declared that in response to Bernie's
We have a new vision for America and at a time when we have three people in this country owning more wealth than the bottom half of America, while 500,000 people are sleeping out on the streets today we think it is time for change, real change.
(By the way, using NYT transcript.)
Donald Trump put us in that situation?
Most of the transfer took place in the eight years Joe Biden served as vice president.
Were this really a debate, the moderators (if they weren't whores) would have pressed him on that. They didn't. On those rare times when he was pressed, it was usually by Eric Swalwell -- although Kamala had her own moment with Joe where enough was enough and she wasn't going to take his spin on immigration.
REUTERS in January 2015:
Barack Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy that looks impossible to erase: the decline of the middle class he has promised to rescue. [. . .] Federal Reserve survey data show families in the middle fifth of the income scale now earn less and their net worth is lower than when Obama took office.
Joe is the past. He demonstrated that onstage last night. He has nothing to offer. But, reality, his past isn't anything America wants to return to. We deserved better and we may have fallen for 'hope and change' eleven years ago, but why should we today?
He has nothing to offer. Except being a ghoul. His third response of the night, supposedly about US healthcare and what was needed, was the following:
Look, this is a very personal to me. When my wife and daughter were killed in an automobile accident my two boys were really very badly injured. I couldn’t imagine what it’d be like had I not had adequate healthcare available immediately. And then when my son came home from Iraq after a year he was diagnosed with terminal cancer and he was given months to live. I can’t fathom what would have happened if, in fact, they said by the way the last six months of your life you’re on your own. We’re cutting off. You’ve used up your time.
First, December 1972. That's when the car accident was. What kind of a ghoul is crafting debate promises off their dead spouse and their dead child from 47 years ago?
Ghoul.
He only has the past.
More to the point, his answer is total b.s. The costs of healthcare, he insists, are very personal to him. Why? Because he might have been stuck with big bills. He wasn't, he was already a member of Congress so he had all the insurance anyone would ever need. But he can relate because if he hadn't been in Congress and had that great insurance, he might have had a big bill.
Might have had.
No, that doesn't say you relate.
It does say that you've grown so pathetic that you will trot out your dead wife from 47 years ago to try to get sympathy.
What else does he have to run on?
Clearly, nothing.
Yes, John was an embarrassment and should have been booed off the stage last night but -- make no mistake -- the biggest idiot on stage was Joe Biden.
Is anyone reviewing Joe's past debate performances? I have. Look at 2008 and 2012 and you don't find Joe using his dead relatives as props. You do find, in 2008, for example, debating Sarah Palin, Joe declaring (Gwen Ifill moderated):
So, in 2008, Joe was all on board, he was going to address income inequality and he was going to ensure "fairness." But that never happened. Eight years he was Vice President and it never happened.
Never.
So why the hell should anyone believe a single thing he promises on stage these days?
He's either a liar or a failure. Actually he could be both. But what is clear is that his past debate promises never came to life and, past as predictor, the current ones won't either.
Last night, Eric Swalwell offered what should be the chant against Joe:
And I’ve seen the anxiety across America where the manufacturing floors go from 1,000 to 100 to one. So, we have to modernize our schools, value the teachers who prepare our kids, wipe the student debt from any teacher that goes into a community that needs it. Invest in America’s communities, especially where places where the best exports are people who move away to get skills. But, Jose, I was six years old when a presidential candidate came to the California Democratic Convention and said, it’s time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans. That candidate was then Senator Joe Biden. Joe Biden was right when he said it was time to the pass the torch to a new generation of Americans 32 years ago.
He’s still right today. If we’re going to solve the issues of automation (PH), pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issues of climate chaos, pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issue of student loan debt, pass the torch. If we’re going to end gun violence for families who are fearful of sending their kids to school, pass the torch.
"Pass the torch, Joe, pass the torch!"
Joe is the man who, in the 2012 debate with US House Rep Paul Ryan, declared of Bib Netanyahu, "Now, with regard to Bibi, he's been my friend for 39 years."
Joe needs to be called out on Iraq. The press hasn't done that. He's actually got a very public moment that everyone's either ignoring or has missed. An e-mail asked when I was going to go into that and not just hint about it? Not ahead of a debate with one minute responses. I doubt seriously that the press will run with it. They didn't in real time. It was a Committee hearing and I don't remember one reporter being present. We covered it in a snapshot and noted it was an important hearing. We mainly highlighted someone no longer in the US Senate. But we did note Joe and his comments.
And the press should have noted Joe. But they ignored it.
We'll cover it here and it will probably be ignored by the press as it was back then. But it would be stupidity to bring it up ahead of the one minute response debate.
Joe's past is out there and it didn't play well in real time but it plays even worse in retrospect.
Reviewing his past debate claims and promises this morning, it's really obvious how quickly the press moved on to different topics and turned their eyes. Do none of Joe's comments have consequences? That claim should be front and center today. But everyone acts like it never happened. Crazy Joe friends for 39 years with a War Criminal.
Joe has had decades -- not years, decades -- to change things. He has nothing to point to with pride. So he lies and pretends there were no deportation issues/crimes under Barack and he gets away with lying for the most part.
America deserved better than the eight years of Barack and Joe. And Joe's promise to return us to that period is apparently an offer to leave us hanging from the cliff.
Marianne Williamson was the clear winner of the debate last night.
20 of the 25 candidates seeking the Democratic Party's presidential nomination have participated in Wednesday and Thursday's debates: US House Rep and Iraq War veteran Tulsi Gabbard, former US House Rep Beto O'Rourke, Senator Elizabeth Warren, Senator Amy Klobuchar, Senator Cory Booker, US House Rep Tim Ryan, former US House Rep John Delaney, NYC Mayor Bill de Blasio, Governor Jay Inslee, former HUD Secretary Julian Castro, former US Senator and Vice President Joe Biden, Senator Bernie Sanders, Marianne Williamson, Senator Kirsten Gillibrand, Senator Kamala Harris, US House Rep Eric Swalwell, Andrew Yang, Senator Michael Bennet, John Hickenlooper and South Ben Mayor Pete Buttigieg.
The clear winners?
Women.
All six women demonstrated leadership and spoke to real issues. Three e-mails felt that 'winners and losers' were in some way lessening the debate. Yeah, I read the headlines on some of that garbage passed off as 'critiques.' For those in the press who've apparently suffered head injuries, let's be really clear: A 'debate' that limits the participants to one minute responses and possibly a 30 second follow up is never going to be a debate. It's speed dating at best.
All you're going to be able to do with that format is determine whether or not the person appears ready for the White House.
All the women -- Tulsi, Elizabeth, Marianne, Kisten, Amy and Kamala -- passed that test.
Now each one has their own issues and agenda and you may or may not support those. But in terms of showing presidential merit, all women succeeded.
Why didn't the men?
There were so many failures and they were the men. With six women participating, that left fourteen men. There were over twice as many men as women on the stage both nights. But the bulk of the men were embarrassments. They didn't just come off poorly, they were embarrassments.
Is Tim Ryan really qualified to be president of the United States if he doesn't know who attacked on 9/11? Is Tim Ryan really qualified if he doesn't know who al Qaeda is?
That's the sort of mistake that should end a campaign immediately.
Women didn't make that mistake on the stage -- in fact, it was Tulsi who corrected Tim and corrected the record.
Tim Ryan's not the only guy that was an embarrassment.
Enter Joe Biden.
Look, Donald Trump has put us in a horrible situation. We do have enormous income inequality and one thing I agree honestly can make massive cuts in the $1.6 trillion in tax loopholes out there and I would be going about eliminating Donald Trump’s tax cuts for the wealthy.
He declared that last night. He declared that in response to Bernie's
We have a new vision for America and at a time when we have three people in this country owning more wealth than the bottom half of America, while 500,000 people are sleeping out on the streets today we think it is time for change, real change.
(By the way, using NYT transcript.)
Donald Trump put us in that situation?
Most of the transfer took place in the eight years Joe Biden served as vice president.
Were this really a debate, the moderators (if they weren't whores) would have pressed him on that. They didn't. On those rare times when he was pressed, it was usually by Eric Swalwell -- although Kamala had her own moment with Joe where enough was enough and she wasn't going to take his spin on immigration.
REUTERS in January 2015:
Barack Obama enters the final two years of his presidency with a blemish on his legacy that looks impossible to erase: the decline of the middle class he has promised to rescue. [. . .] Federal Reserve survey data show families in the middle fifth of the income scale now earn less and their net worth is lower than when Obama took office.
Joe is the past. He demonstrated that onstage last night. He has nothing to offer. But, reality, his past isn't anything America wants to return to. We deserved better and we may have fallen for 'hope and change' eleven years ago, but why should we today?
He has nothing to offer. Except being a ghoul. His third response of the night, supposedly about US healthcare and what was needed, was the following:
Look, this is a very personal to me. When my wife and daughter were killed in an automobile accident my two boys were really very badly injured. I couldn’t imagine what it’d be like had I not had adequate healthcare available immediately. And then when my son came home from Iraq after a year he was diagnosed with terminal cancer and he was given months to live. I can’t fathom what would have happened if, in fact, they said by the way the last six months of your life you’re on your own. We’re cutting off. You’ve used up your time.
First, December 1972. That's when the car accident was. What kind of a ghoul is crafting debate promises off their dead spouse and their dead child from 47 years ago?
Ghoul.
He only has the past.
More to the point, his answer is total b.s. The costs of healthcare, he insists, are very personal to him. Why? Because he might have been stuck with big bills. He wasn't, he was already a member of Congress so he had all the insurance anyone would ever need. But he can relate because if he hadn't been in Congress and had that great insurance, he might have had a big bill.
Might have had.
No, that doesn't say you relate.
It does say that you've grown so pathetic that you will trot out your dead wife from 47 years ago to try to get sympathy.
What else does he have to run on?
Clearly, nothing.
Yes, John was an embarrassment and should have been booed off the stage last night but -- make no mistake -- the biggest idiot on stage was Joe Biden.
Is anyone reviewing Joe's past debate performances? I have. Look at 2008 and 2012 and you don't find Joe using his dead relatives as props. You do find, in 2008, for example, debating Sarah Palin, Joe declaring (Gwen Ifill moderated):
Gwen, I don't know where to start. We don't call a
redistribution in my neighborhood Scranton, Claymont, Wilmington, the
places I grew up, to give the fair to say that not giving Exxon Mobil
(NYSE:XOM) another $4 billion tax cut this year as John calls for and
giving it to middle class people to be able to pay to get their kids to
college, we don't call that redistribution. We call that fairness number
one. Number two fact, 95 percent of the small businesses in America,
their owners make less than $250,000 a year. They would not get one
single solitary penny increase in taxes, those small businesses. Now,
with regard to the -- to the health care plan, you know, it's with one
hand you giveth, the other you take it.
So, in 2008, Joe was all on board, he was going to address income inequality and he was going to ensure "fairness." But that never happened. Eight years he was Vice President and it never happened.
Never.
So why the hell should anyone believe a single thing he promises on stage these days?
He's either a liar or a failure. Actually he could be both. But what is clear is that his past debate promises never came to life and, past as predictor, the current ones won't either.
Last night, Eric Swalwell offered what should be the chant against Joe:
And I’ve seen the anxiety across America where the manufacturing floors go from 1,000 to 100 to one. So, we have to modernize our schools, value the teachers who prepare our kids, wipe the student debt from any teacher that goes into a community that needs it. Invest in America’s communities, especially where places where the best exports are people who move away to get skills. But, Jose, I was six years old when a presidential candidate came to the California Democratic Convention and said, it’s time to pass the torch to a new generation of Americans. That candidate was then Senator Joe Biden. Joe Biden was right when he said it was time to the pass the torch to a new generation of Americans 32 years ago.
He’s still right today. If we’re going to solve the issues of automation (PH), pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issues of climate chaos, pass the torch. If we’re going to solve the issue of student loan debt, pass the torch. If we’re going to end gun violence for families who are fearful of sending their kids to school, pass the torch.
"Pass the torch, Joe, pass the torch!"
Joe is the man who, in the 2012 debate with US House Rep Paul Ryan, declared of Bib Netanyahu, "Now, with regard to Bibi, he's been my friend for 39 years."
Joe needs to be called out on Iraq. The press hasn't done that. He's actually got a very public moment that everyone's either ignoring or has missed. An e-mail asked when I was going to go into that and not just hint about it? Not ahead of a debate with one minute responses. I doubt seriously that the press will run with it. They didn't in real time. It was a Committee hearing and I don't remember one reporter being present. We covered it in a snapshot and noted it was an important hearing. We mainly highlighted someone no longer in the US Senate. But we did note Joe and his comments.
And the press should have noted Joe. But they ignored it.
We'll cover it here and it will probably be ignored by the press as it was back then. But it would be stupidity to bring it up ahead of the one minute response debate.
Joe's past is out there and it didn't play well in real time but it plays even worse in retrospect.
Reviewing his past debate claims and promises this morning, it's really obvious how quickly the press moved on to different topics and turned their eyes. Do none of Joe's comments have consequences? That claim should be front and center today. But everyone acts like it never happened. Crazy Joe friends for 39 years with a War Criminal.
Joe has had decades -- not years, decades -- to change things. He has nothing to point to with pride. So he lies and pretends there were no deportation issues/crimes under Barack and he gets away with lying for the most part.
America deserved better than the eight years of Barack and Joe. And Joe's promise to return us to that period is apparently an offer to leave us hanging from the cliff.
Marianne Williamson was the clear winner of the debate last night.
Millions of American children live in chronic trauma and we should be rescuing them no differently than if they were victims of a natural disaster.Millions go to school every day hungry, in schools that don’t even have adequate school supplies to teach a child to read. #Bigtruth
We are going to turn from a dirty economy to a clean economy, we’re going to have a Green New Deal. We’re going to create millions of jobs. We’re going to do this within the next twelve years because I’m not interested in just winning the next election. #BigTruth #DemDebates
Marianne Williamson Retweeted
Marianne Williamson did not speak for the first 27 minutes of #DemDebate2. But when she finally did, everything she said was awesome.
I have had a career harnessing the inspiration and the motivation and the excitement of people - masses of people. #BigTruth #DemDebate
"@jacindaardern has said that she wants New Zealand to be the country that is the best country in the world for a child to grow up. And I want to call her and say girlfriend you are on because I want the United States to be that too." #DemDebate
Marianne Williamson Retweeted
"Mr. President, if you're listening, I want you to hear me, please. You have harnessed fear for political purposes and only love can cast that out."
Watch Marianne Williamson's message to President Trump in her closing statement #DemDebate2
Thanks to you I was on stage tonight. Help qualify me for the next debates & join me in a great revolution of consciousness, by which we achieve historic changes and make the world a better place. bit.ly/2xf3Ts0 #DemDebate #BigTruth
And that gets back into not just Big Pharma, not just health insurance companies, it has to do with chemical policies, it has to do with environmental policies, it has to do with food policies, it has to do with drug policies.. #BigTruth #DemDebate
So I, sir, I have a feeling you know what you’re doing. I’m going to harness love for political purposes, I will meet you on that field, and sir, love will win. #DemDebate #BigTruth
This man has reached into the psyche of the American people and he has harnessed fear for political purposes. So, Mr. President, if you’re listening, I want you to hear me please. You have harnessed fear for political purposes and only love can cast that out. #DemDebate
I have an idea about Donald Trump. Donald Trump is not going to be beaten just by insider politics talk. He is not going to be beaten just by somebody who has plans. He is going to be beaten by somebody who has an idea of what this man has done. #DemDebate
We just wait ‘til somebody gets sick and then we talk about who’s going to pay for the treatment and how they’re going to be treated. What we need to talk about is why so many Americans have unnecessary chronic illnesses, so many more compared to other countries. #DemDebate
If you think we’re going to beat Donald Trump by just having all these plans, you’ve got another thing coming. #BigTruth #DemDebate
Decades of failed United States intervention in Latin America from Guatemala to Honduras and more has created the conditions that spur migrants to come to our border. If we don’t deal with the root causes we can’t expect the pressure on our southern border to change. #BigTruth
And the Democratic Party should be on the side of reparations for slavery for this very reason. I do not believe that the average American is a racist, but the average American is woefully under-educated about the history of race in the United States. #BigTruth #DemDebate
Child advocacy is not being addressed with the attention and care it deserves. Sign our petition now to stand for our future.
All of these issues are extremely important, but they are specifics, they are symptoms. And the underlying cause has to do with deep, deep, deep realms of racial injustice. Both in our criminal justice system and in our economic system. #BigTruth #DemDebate
We need reparations. We have not yet done all that it is morally incumbent upon us to do in order to heal the ugly wound of slavery.
And what President Trump has done is not only attack these children, not only demonize these immigrants, he is attacking a basic principle of America’s moral core. We open our hearts to the stranger. #BigTruth #DemDebate
I propose a $200-$500 billion plan of reparations, with the money to be disbursed by a council of esteemed African American leaders over a period of twenty years.
Both of those things are a crime, and if your government does it, that doesn’t make it less of a crime. These are state-sponsored crimes. #BigTruth #DemDebate
Marianne Williamson Retweeted
Marianne Williamson nailed it when drew the connection between health policy and environmental policies. Our issues are connected and we need a #GreenNewDeal. #DemDebate #ClimateDebate
If you forcibly take a child from their parents’ arms, you are kidnapping them. And if you take a lot of children and put them in a detainment center, thus inflicting chronic trauma upon them, that’s called child abuse. This is collective child abuse. #BigTruth #DemDebate
All three women last night did a better job than any of the men. Eric was the best of the men. Pete needs to grasp that the world may love a lover but we don't necessarily elect one as president. In other words, congratulations on your marriage, now please find another topic. Hint, it's not a dead relative. Pete is proof that the debates of this style won't deal with reality. The racism in his leadership as mayor was briefly and softly touched on by Rachel and he was allowed to spin like crazy.
But the moderators biggest problem?
Sexism. Male or female, why did they let the men continue? Kirsten was repeatedly told to pipe down. But if you didn't pipe down, if you were Joe Biden, for example, you were rewarded for that. You were called on to speak or just allowed to.
There was a moment in the debate where Kamala was attempting to speak and yet again the moderators allow a man -- and it wasn't his turn -- to speak. And the look on her face as she registered that was priceless.
Time and again, when a vocal 'scuffle' emerged, they might chastise a man but they went with them, they let them speak.
Women really had to fight to be heard. Kirsten and Kamala fought hard and I'm not sure how that looks to the viewers. Marianne did what she does best, draw the attention away from nonsense. By being a steady figure, she draws your attention and doesn't have to enter the fray to get it.
The following sites updated -- and community sites offer their takes on the debate:
