Saturday, December 5, 2020

What's in your queue?

 

That's WILL & GRACE -- a 9 minute clip.  Wish they'd posted the whole episode.  I love the scenes before it.  "Last Exit To Brooklyn" may be the series' best episode.


I have PEACOCK and I have to wonder why?  It has damn little I'm watching.  WILL & GRACE?  I can see the original run on COZY.  I don't know why PEACOCK doesn't have it or especially the last three years of the show -- the reboot.  I also don't understand why they don't have more UNIVERSAL films on the channel.  


I'm getting really tired of it and of DISNEY+ which both fail to deliver content worth watching.  I'm thinking of cancelling both.  They just seem a waste of time and money.  


Even NETFLIX has more to offer than those two.  


I'm more likely to watch the free streamer PLUTO and especially THE CAROL BURNETT CHANNEL on that. 


On NETFLIX, I'm mainly watching what I already watched -- SENSE8, ATYPICAL, DOLLY PARTON'S HEART STRINGS, GRACE AND FRANKIE, IRON FIST, SECRET CITY, SANTA CLARITA DIET, THE POLITICIAN, I THINK YOU SHOULD LEAVE WITH TIM ROBINSON, RUSSIAN DOLL, WEEDS, SPECIAL and MAN WITH A PLAN (the CBS sitcom I liked which NETFLIX just added).


My friend Don and I were on the phone for an hour just flipping through rows and rows of NETFLIX offerings and commenting on various films and movies.  At least NETFLIX has programming.  PEACOCK and DISNEY+ need to get their act together.

Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


 Friday, December 4, 2020.  Protests continue in Nasiriyah despite Moqtada's killing protesters there last Friday.


This morning, protests take place in Nasiriyah, one week after cleric and public menace Moqtada al-Sadr sent his thugs in to kill civilians there.  KIRKUK NOW Tweets:


Protests in the southern Iraqi city Nasiriyah (in Dhi Qar province) continue today. Security forces are spread out throughout the city, blocking main roads. Big demonstration expected after Friday sermon: local sources. Map: Wikimapia.org; wikimapia.org/#lang=en&lat=3
Image


Dilan Sirwan (RUDAW) reports:


Protestors returned to Habboubi Square, the focal point of the southern Iraqi city's protests, to rebuild more durable structures using bricks after Sadr’s supporters attacked them and burned their tents down last Friday. Protesters were forced out of their tents and shot at by Sadr supporters, leaving at least seven people dead and scores wounded in a city which has significant bloodshed since demonstrations began last October. 


A week later, protestors rallied again, chanting their “cowards do not build freedom” slogan, demanding their rights from the government, and asking that killers of protesters pay for their crimes.

“We will continue protesting – it is our constitutional right that no one can take away,” Amir Karim, a protestor told Rudaw’s Halkawt Aziz.

The protestors of Nasiriyah have several demands.

“We want the people who shed our blood to be hanged, we are families of those martyrs and they need to pay for their murder,” a protestor said. “We have no electricity, no proper sewage system, no form of life.”

For any who missed last week's assault, let's drop back to Monday's snapshot to note this:


Friday saw an attack on the peaceful protesters in Nassariya.  This was an attack, it was not a ''clash.''  The protesters had been in al Haboubi Square for some time.  When Prime Minister Mustafa al-Kadhimi ordered the Baghdad square attacked and the tents torn down a month ago, he attempted something similar in Nassaiya.  It did not fly in the city, it did not fly in the province (Dhi Qar Governorate).  Mustafa had to back down and the protesters continued their peaceful protest.  As Sinan Mahmoud (THE NATIONAL) observed yesterday, "The coronavirus and violence against demonstrators has seen the moement slow elsewhere but it endures in Nasiriyah."


Friday, they were attacked.  The death toll has now risen to 16.  With over 80 more left injured that number could continue to increase.  


Shi'ite cleric Moqtada al-Sadr ordered the attack.  Dilan S. Hussein (RUDAW) reports that Moqtada told his cult to "clean up the 'atheism' that he said had taken over the city's streets" before sending them out on Friday.  They arrived at the square with loaded guns, in four-wheel vehicles and with props.  


 Basra journalist Mohammed Qasim Tweets:


#Muqtada al-Sadr’s militia mixed alcohol with the #Rainbow flag, meaning that homosexuals and #alcohol are corruption and must be eliminated, and this is a public violation of #human rights.
Image
Image
Image



Moqtada gave the orders and then sicked his rabid cult on the protesters.  


This was a planned assault.  Not only does the Iraqi government need to disarm his goons, they need to put them on trial.  Equally true, it was not necessary for the cult to enter the town square (al Haboubi square) -- where the peaceful protesters were -- and have been for over a year -- in order to get to any destination. They chose to enter that square, they did so with props and they did so with guns.  And they chose to enter the square in "four wheel drive vehicles."  This was not a 'clash,' it was a planned assault.





Ridha al-Rikabi was among those attacked last Friday.  Moqtada's cult shot Ridah in the head.  Monday, AFP reports, he passed away and the streets of Nasiriya were filled with thousands of people who turned out to march in his funeral.


Here are two Tweets of the thousands who turned out.


The funeral of Rida Al-Rikabi who died of his injuries after supporters of #Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr opened fire at protesters in #Haboubi Square, Nasiriyah on Nov 28. #ساحة_الحبوبي
1:13
16 views
Quote Tweet
Amer Ibrahim عامر إبراهيم
@amiraljubori
·
تشييع الشهبد "رضا الركابي" الذي استشهد متأثراً بجراحه بعد حادثة إقتحام #ساحة_الحبوبي قبل يومين .
30K views
0:21 / 1:23



The attack wasn't just a physical assault, it is also believed to be part of an effort by Moqtada al-Sadr to become the next prime minister.  Mustafa al-Kadhimi, Iraq's current failed prime minister, has stated elections will take place on June 1st -- parliamentary elections.   Iraq Security and Humanitarian Monitor notes this timeline:


On November 21, the Cabinet asked for IQD60 billion to finance the Iraqi High Elections Commission and PM Kadhimi later stressed that Parliament must pass an election financing bill to allow the Commission to prepare for the June 6 polls. On November 22, Parliament discussed a controversial Law on Information Technology Crimes that was condemned by rights organizations fearing that it will damage free speech and silence dissent. On November 26, representative Ahmed al-Jubouri (aka Abu Mazin) said the recently formed Iraqi Front has halted its efforts to remove Speaker Mohammed al-Halbousi. On November 27, followers of Moqtada al-Sadr rallied for mass demonstrations in several provinces and clashed with protesters in Nasiriyah’s Haboubi Square. Gunmen believed to be Sadr followers killed seven people, wounded 90 and burned protester tents in Haboubi Square. A Sadr aide blamed protesters acting on “foreign agendas” for the deadly clashes and threatened more violence. PM Kadhimi fired the police chief and formed a crisis cell led by his National Security Advisor Qasim al-Araji. Thousands of Sadrists also gathered in Baghdad’s Tahrir square after Sadr said he will participate in the next elections to achieve a Sadrist majority and choose the next PM. On November 28, three more protesters died as Iraqi riot police stormed the protest square at Kut City. more…


Omar al-Jaffal (AL-MONITOR) explains:


Iraqi Shiite cleric and leader of the Sadrist movement Muqtada al-Sadr has launched what looks like an early electoral campaign in preparation for the parliamentary elections slated for June 6. Sadr had said before that he would not participate in the elections this time, but he has changed his mind and declared that not only will he participate in the elections, he also plans to win a majority required to gain the premiership.

Sadr has ordered his followers to gather on Dec. 4, in a mass demonstration attending Friday pray and declare unity against the opponents. This was seen as mobilization for widespread participation in the early parliamentary elections.

In the same vein, thousands of his supporters answered Sadr’s call to demonstrate in Tahrir Square in the center of Baghdad on Nov. 27, demanding “an end to corruption.”

Sadr did not attend the protests to address his supporters, some of whom were wearing army fatigues. He sent a representative, Sheikh Khudhayer al-Ansari, who tried to emulate the religious and political oratory style of Sadr and his father, Mohammed Sadiq al-Sadr.

Sadr’s propaganda among his supporters is that he “does not seek to be in power” but “wants to vanquish those who want to harm Iraq.”


The top Shiite cleric tried to reassure the people and political forces that his move to win the elections will not be through “violence, killings, starting fires, blocking roads, bombing, occupation or any form of injustice.”

Nonetheless, Sadr’s supporters put on quite a violent show in the city of Nasiriyah, capital of the Dhi Qar governorate, raising speculation that Sadr might resort to violence to snatch a victory in the early elections and secure the position of prime minister.

 


Drama Queen and Cult leader Moqtada al-Sadr has long wanted to be prime minister.  An arrest warrant from the early years of the war has held him in check in the past.  Whenever he feared it might be executed, he would flee to Iran and hide out there for months.

Moqtada now appears to think it is time to seize the day and become prime minister.  The Iranian government held him in check in 2010 -- a fact few observers ever even noted.  Moqtada betrayed his followers that year -- he held a poll for them to explain who they supported for prime minister with the promise that he would honor their wishes but then the Iranian government (like the US government) wanted thug Nouri al-Maliki to have a second term.  Moqtada immediately threw his support behind Nouri and betrayed his followers (again).  No one likes to note that reality.  But it happened in public.  It's a fact.  


Moqtada's a betrayer -- repeatedly.


He's also a failed 'leader.'  He's been resorting to homophobic attacks since April.  Again, we've noted it here.  Western media outlets seem unable to note it -- TV or print or radio.  


This is when Moqtada really attempts to tear apart the protest movement that most state took off on October 1, 2019.  (They're wrong.  It started September 30th but the western press didn't report on that massive protest so the 'record' now has it beginning on October 1, 2019.)  


Tearing apart that movement is behind the attack last Friday.  Why is Moqtada doing that?  He has nothing to run on.  His followers still live in slums -- in Baghdad, Sadr City is the most physically disgusting area of the city, "slum" does not begin to describe it.  Moqtada never achieved anything himself.  (I think he got accounting training when he was hiding out in Iraq at one point and working as a hotel clerk.)  Even his position of 'leader' came about by accident.  Moqtada didn't lead anyone.  Daddy's little boi just took over when Daddy died.  And since taking over, he's delivered nothing for the people.


So what does that have to do with the protest movement?  It has delivered.  It has shined a light on the corruption in Iraq, it has demonstrated how ineffective the government is and it has provided a voice to many Iraqis that are left out of the conversation by the politicians who supposedly represent them and by the international media which supposedly covers them.


Most important?  They toppled Hayder al-Abadi's government.  He was prime minister when the protests began.  They sent him packing.  Mustafa only became prime minister on May 7th.


That's a huge accomplishment, sending a sitting prime minister packing.  Ousting him before his term has ended.  Former US President Barack Obama had to apply a lot of pressure to oust Nouri after his second term ended.  After it ended.  But the protesters managed to oust an ineffective prime minister before his term ended.


That's amazing.


And Moqtada wants credit for it.  AFP reports that Moqtada's been Tweeting various claims including that he's responsible for installing Mustafa and for changing the electoral law.


He's not responsible for that.  His cult did briefly participate in the protests before he pulled them, then sent them back in, then pulled them, then . . .  


He needs something to run on.  While the actual protesters are still protesting and in the news, it's a lot more difficult for him to cliam


His sick cult runs a campaign of intimidation against anyone who speaks out.  Even MPs are scared of Moqtada (three have e-mailed the public account in the last few days expressing alarm over Moqtada's actions, alarm they don't feel safe expressing publicly).  The protesters aren't scared of him.  They laugh at him.  They mocked the drama queen when he tried to take control of the movement in April -- after walking out yet again -- by insisting that men and women could not protest together.


Moqtada gets nervous around women.  He's rather impotent.  


Moqtada campaigning for prime minister right now can make claims like he has and will be laughed at by many and the press -- the Iraqi press, the US press isn't interested -- can quote them and be objective.  If they protesters are silenced and sent home, will the press -- on their own -- have the backbone to challenge Moqtada's claims?


Moqtada is a very dangerous sociopath and that's reality.  He manages to hold it together for a few years -- during which time, he is on medication for his bipolar disorder and anxiety but he, according to two close to him, feels the medication is a sign of weakness so he goes off it and we get crazy Moqtada -- the real Moqtada that the medications conceal but not overrule.


Sociopath.


But he and his goons don't scare everyone.  We'll note this Tweet:


2. Leader visits the Rāfidhī Muqtada al-Sadr, leader of Sunni death squad Jaysh al-Mahdi, responsible for killing 1000 Sunnis in Baghdād in ONE DAY, and gifts him 30 brand new cars.
Image


That's Saudi Arabia's Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in the photo with Moqtada -- the photo's from their July 2017 meet-up.


And we'll note this Tweet:


A Basra National Ballet presentation. Muqtada al-Sadr staring in. “ Dancing with Grizzly Adams” Watch #Sadr through interpretative dance befriend a bear and fall in love. Co-staring The Basra Bear. Brought to you by #Iran
Image


Oh, Moqtada, the whole world laughs at you.   Let's note this Tweet:


The terrorist Muqtada al-Sadr is the biggest head of terrorism in iraq
Image


No one respects Moqtada, he's a sick f**k.  Even his cult knows this on some level.  


But Mustafa is working with Moqtada -- or using him.  It's become very clear that Mustafa wants a second term as prime minister despite stating he would be prime minister for one brief term that would end when parliamentary elections resulted in the seating of a new Parliament and the naming of a new prime minister (after the 30 days as prime minister-designate).  So it appears Mustafa is using Moqtada to meet Mustafa's aims.


Mustafa has repeatedly claimed that he is protecting the protesters.  But he's not.  And no one who has killed a protester has been brought to justice.


No, Mustafa wants the protests over as well.  They are a testament to his failures.  So he's using 'security' as an excuse to carry out attacks on the protesters.  This Tweet:

Observers: The military force sent by (Kazemi) to the city of Nasiriyah aims to end the demonstrations and arrest the activists, not to protect the demonstrations.
Image


The protesters have been followed, stalked, attacked, injured and killed.  They're not backing down.


Nassiriyah re-raises the slogan "People want to overthrow the regime" in response to latest violence against protestors.
Quote Tweet
حسين آل ثانـيَ 
Flag of Iraq
@HS___TA
·
Down-pointing red triangle
على دين الناصريه ... وماتقول!
Image


Mustafa, Moqtada and the other cowards who fled the country when things got rough for them (under Saddam or since) don't understand the protesters because they don't understand courage.  


That's what the protesters have -- courage.  And they can see a better Iraq that serves all the citizens.  That's what they're fighting for and that dream is not going to die no matter how many times the protesters are attacked.  


Turning to the US, from yesterday's snapshot:


The wars go on.  And so does the incompetence of Joe Biden who, please remember, helped start the illegal war and continued it.  He's putting together a cabinet and it's a cabinet of eye sores.  Neera Tandem, for example, presided over a toxic work culture at the Center For American Progress where women were repeatedly harassed on the job and where their complaints were not taken seriously.  Neera finally 'addressed' the issue after the media reported on it -- she did so by holding a staff wide meeting where she outed one of the women who had gone to the press.


That should mean the end of any career in management Neera might have.  But Joe looked at it and said, "Hey, she's my kind of girl.  I'm accused of harassment by multiple women and accused of assault by one woman.  I could send a strong message that I will not tolerate harassment in my administration but, what the hell, let's run with Neera instead."


I don't believe Gina Raimondo tops Neera but she's certainly just as bad.  Julia Rock and Andrew Perez (DAILY POSTER) report:


I was wrong.  She isn't just as bad.  She had the brains to drop out.  Kenny Stancil (COMMON DREAMS) reports:


Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo, a Democrat who had emerged as the frontrunner to be President-elect Joe Biden's health secretary despite overseeing one of the deadliest Covid-19 outbreaks in the United States, announced Thursday that she has removed herself from contention for the job, much to the delight of progressives who had strongly opposed her candidacy and potential nomination. 


Neera is too stupid to care about the damage she's doing to Joe's presidency.  Before he's even sworn in, she's brought too much grief and, if she had any sense or wanted to help Joe, she would announce she was declining the nomination to head OMB to 'spend more time with my family.'


Neera's too stupid and too arrogant.  Gina at least has some sense.  She realized the very real damage her nomination was doing to the incoming administration and she bowed out.  


At JACOB, Meagan Day and Branko Marcetic have articles about Biden's campaign that are worth checking out.  Also worth checking out is ON THE ISSUES WITH MICHELE GOODWIN.  That's a podcast Michele is doing for Ms. Magazine.  The podcat is audio but after the audio is posted, they are putting transcripts up as well.


The following sites updated:







Thursday, December 3, 2020

HBO MAX will provide the new films, you'll need to provide the popcorn

 The biggest entertainment news of the week?


HBO MAX, in 2021, will debut every WARNER BROTHERS movie in streaming the same day it is released in theaters.  It will then stay on HBO MAX for 30 days.  After that, you will have to wait for it to show up for purchase or rental on sites like AMAZON or wait for it to be carried by some other streaming service (like HBO or NETFLIX or whatever).


Via VARIETY, here's a lit of the 2021 movies and the dates that they open in theaters which is the same date they being streaming (for 30 days) on HBO MAX:


Film Release
Mortal KombatJan 15
The Little ThingsJan 29
Tom and JerryMar 5
The Many Saints of NewarkMar 12
ReminiscenceApr 16
Godzilla vs. KongMay 21
The Conjuring: The Devil Made Me Do ItJun 4
In the HeightsJun 18
Space Jam: A New LegacyJul 16
The Suicide SquadAug 6
DuneOct 1
ElvisNov 5
King RichardNov 19
Matrix 4Dec 22
Judas and the Black MessiahTBA
MalignantTBA
Those Who Wish Me DeadTBA


Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"


 Thursday, December 3, 2020.  Joe Biden's picks just get worse while the press ignores Moqtada al-Sadr's assault on people and one reporter rushes in to explain that others did report it, honest!, forgetting that she was supposed to report it for her own paper.


CONFLICTS OF INTEREST speaks with Iraq and Afghanistan War veteran Scott Spaulding.




The wars go on.  And so does the incompetence of Joe Biden who, please remember, helped start the illegal war and continued it.  He's putting together a cabinet and it's a cabinet of eye sores.  Neera Tandem, for example, presided over a toxic work culture at the Center For American Progress where women were repeatedly harassed on the job and where their complaints were not taken seriously.  Neera finally 'addressed' the issue after the media reported on it -- she did so by holding a staff wide meeting where she outed one of the women who had gone to the press.


That should mean the end of any career in management Neera might have.  But Joe looked at it and said, "Hey, she's my kind of girl.  I'm accused of harassment by multiple women and accused of assault by one woman.  I could send a strong message that I will not tolerate harassment in my administration but, what the hell, let's run with Neera instead."


I don't believe Gina Raimondo tops Neera but she's certainly just as bad.  Julia Rock and Andrew Perez (DAILY POSTER) report:

Rhode Island Gov. Gina Raimondo has presided over one of the deadliest COVID outbreaks in the country — and new documents obtained by The Daily Poster detail how she helped nursing home lobbyists shield health care companies from coronavirus-related lawsuits. 

Now, Raimondo — a former Wall Street executive — is reportedly being considered for the nation’s top health care policy job in the incoming Biden administration.

Politico reported last week that Raimondo, who made her name slashing state workers’ pensions, is one of the finalists to lead the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services under President-elect Joe Biden. Raimondo was also previously considered for Treasury Secretary, according to the American Prospect.

As governor, Raimondo has slammed proposals to expand Medicare to cover everyone. Amid the pandemic in August, her administration approved health insurance companies’ steep premium increases that were criticized by the state’s Democratic attorney general as “unnecessary and ill-advised.” Health insurers have been raking in record profits, with fewer people seeking care because of the pandemic.

Raimondo has also pushed for Medicaid cuts that nursing home workers warned would result in unsafe staffing levels — and in April, she issued an executive order sought by health care industry lobbyists that shielded nursing homes from lawsuits when their business decisions injure or kill people. The order was later expanded to shield nursing homes, hospitals, and other health care providers.

While the Biden transition is reportedly considering Raimondo for HHS Secretary, residents and workers in Rhode Island’s nursing homes have faced deadly consequences. Documents obtained by The Daily Poster show that Raimondo quickly responded to lobbyists’ demands for an executive order granting them legal immunity during the pandemic.

“What immunity has done is allow nursing homes to act unreasonably without accountability,” one personal injury lawyer told the Providence Journal last month.

Rhode Island currently has one of the highest coronavirus death rates by population in the country, according to data from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). More than 70 percent of COVID-19 deaths in the state have been linked to long-term care facilities — only two other states have seen similar nursing home death rates, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation. 

The state’s hospitals are completely full. On Monday, patients were admitted to field hospitals for the first time in Rhode Island during the pandemic.


There are many qualified women -- and men -- the ones Joe continues to pick are not qualified.  At BLACK AGENDA REPORT, Dr. Wilmer J. Leon III points out:

When you look at Biden's cabinet announcements it takes me to former Giant's coach Bill Parcels who said, "you are what your record says you are." In this case, you are what your cabinet says you are.  It is the people who make the policy; policy does not make itself. The history of many of these nominees reflects America’s darkest impulses not its better angels.

“Biden has it backwards.”

What was good about America “green lighting” the NATO bombing of Libya and the resulting execution of Muammar Gaddafi?  This led to the destabilization of the country and the region.  According to The Atlantic , “The Libya intervention marked the third time in a decade that Washington embraced regime change and then failed to plan for the consequences.”  America’s better angels?  I think not.

What good has come from America “green lighting” Saudi Arabia’s invasion in Yemen and the continuing logistical support for what the UN  has called the worst man-made humanitarian crisis in the world?  Per the UN, after nearly six years of conflict, “14.3 million people are classified as being in acute need, with around 3.2 million requiring treatment for acute malnutrition; that includes two million children under-five, and more than one million pregnant and lactating women.”  If America were winning the battle of our better angles, we would stop our support of the Saudi’s and provide these starving people food, water and medicine. Instead, America is losing the battle to the MIC, big oil and its darkest impulses. These impulses convince you that it is more important to sell weapons and take resources than provide humanitarian aid. 

America’s imperialist, hegemonic and evil regime change policies did not make themselves.  Again, it is the people who make the policy. Look at the record of some of Biden’s cabinet nominees and their involvement in these atrocities. 

“America is losing the battle to the MIC, big oil and its darkest impulses.”

Biden’s choice for Secretary of Defense is projected to be Michele Flournoy. She was the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Strategy during the Clinton administration. During her tenure she authored the May 1997 Quadrennial Defense Review (QDR).  The founding principle of this document is that the unilateral use of force is acceptable to defend any US interest the US deems important and the US is the sole arbiter of these issues. She is the proponent of permanent war or as she calls it, “full spectrum dominance.”  As the Under Secretary of Defense for Policy during the Obama administration, she was instrumental in designing the horrific regime change policies that led to the invasions of Libya and Syria.

Biden’s choice for Secretary of State is Tony Blinken. He was a top advisor to then Sen. Joe Biden who was Chair of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee. They played a major role in shoring up support among the Democrat-controlled Senate for Bush’s illegal invasion of Iraq. 

We can also thank Avril Haines, Biden’s pick to be Director of National Intelligence for her role in the Yemen, Libya and Syria policies. Haines also supported arms sales to Saudi Arabia.

On the domestic policy front, Biden has named Neera Tanden as his nominee to lead the Office of Management and Budget.  It should be troubling that a nominee for this position has advocated for cuts to Social Security and other vital social safety net programs.  During a pandemic, an economy in recession and 30-40 million Americans facing eviction, austerity is not the appropriate response.  

“Flournoy is a proponent of permanent war.”

Tanden also has a hawkish foreign policy side.  Leading up to the Libya bombing she was advocating taking Libya’s oil as repayment for the US backed bombing of the country. “If we want to continue to engage in the world, gestures like having oil rich countries partially pay us back doesn’t seem crazy to me…” This is the same mindset that Trump articulated in Syria.

In his speech, “Time to Break Silence” Dr. King warned us about austerity, “A few years ago…it seemed as if there was a real promise of hope for the poor…through the poverty program…Then came the buildup in Vietnam, and I watched this program broken and eviscerated, as if it were some idle political plaything of a society gone mad on war, and I knew that America would never invest the necessary funds or energies in rehabilitation of its poor so long as adventures like Vietnam continued to draw men and skills and money like some demonic destructive suction tube.”  Just replace Vietnam with Afghanistan, Syria or Yemen, etc.  We are still “a society gone mad on war”.



At WSWS, Kevin Reed observes:


In the three weeks since former Vice President Joseph Biden and Senator Kamala Harris declared victory in the 2020 presidential election, it has become clear that the Democrats are assembling a right-wing administration that represents the interests of corporate America, the financial elite and US military-intelligence.

The truth of this assessment is demonstrated by the tech policy of the president-elect, which has been articulated in policy statements, media reports and comments made by Biden himself prior to the November 3 elections.

Although tech policy is not identified as a top priority on the Biden-Harris transition website, it is evident that the relationship of the new administration with Silicon Valley is a critical element of the overall of strategy of the Democrats.

According to a report by CBS News on November 11, the Biden transition team is being advised by a “cadre of tech industry types, including executives with political data company Alloy, formed by LinkedIn founder Reid Hoffman, and Google chairperson Eric Schmidt’s firm Rebellion Defense.”

After leaving Google in 2019, the multi-billionaire Eric Schmidt has become an evangelist for the integration of big tech with the US military. Schmidt sits on at least two government advisory boards that promote the use of artificial intelligence technologies by the Defense Department and he has invested in military tech startups such as Rebellion Defense.

Rebellion Defense is a Pentagon contractor that specializes in analyzing video filmed by unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs). The company website says, “Artificial Intelligence is redefining the art of the possible. Consumers worldwide benefit from it—but our adversaries are using it against us. Our national defense urgently needs to harness Silicon Valley’s best technologies and talent to address this challenge. We help our defense and national security agencies unlock the power of data across all domains. … Rebellion Defense builds for the warfighter.”

Meanwhile, members of the incoming Biden-Harris cabinet are being drawn from private consulting and investment firms with deep ties to the technology sector and the military. According to a report in the New York Times on Sunday, both Biden’s choice for Secretary of State, Anthony Blinken, and one of the leading candidates for defense secretary, Michele Flournoy, are co-founders of WestExec Advisors.

The Times report says that among WestExec’s clients is a firm called Shield AI, “a San Diego-based company that makes surveillance drones and signed a contract worth as much as $7.2 million with the Air Force this year to deliver artificial intelligence tools to help drones operate in combat missions.”


Jimmy Dore offers the following commentary on Biden's picks.



THE KATIE HALPER SHOW offered the following discussion.





Looking at this landscape, Osita Nwanevu (THE NEW REPUBLIC) argues:


It’s been noted elsewhere that the left has responded much more quickly and aggressively to Biden’s selections than it had to Obama’s as he put together his first presidential cabinet. If so, it doesn’t seem like the flurries of statements, social media posts, and articles that have been written to counter every stray rumor and announcement have mattered very much at all—the process is chugging along and Biden’s nominees are just a couple of notches left of the Obama team; activists might take a small victory in torpedoing an Emanuel nomination. There was never good reason to expect more. This is partially because a Republican Senate, should Democrats lose in Georgia’s runoff elections next month, will be an obstacle to the confirmation of even moderate nominees. But it’s more substantially because the moderates in the Democratic Party don’t share the left’s policy goals and would oppose giving them a meaningful presence in the Biden administration even if they could.

The conventional wisdom about the left’s relationship with the Democratic Party has fully reversed itself in the space of six to eight months. As the Democratic primary ended, it was often argued that Sanders and the left lost because they had marginalized themselves—anti-establishment rhetoric, refusals to accept compromise, and the toxicity of prominent voices had alienated not only most of the Democratic electorate but also Democratic elites who might have otherwise been won over. “Twitter isn’t real life,” it was said. But naturally, after election day, Democratic underperformance down-ballot from Biden was blamed mostly on the left’s influence. Democratic elites, it’s said now, were persuaded by the left into taking on or accepting unpopular messaging about socialism and policing—thanks in part, evidently, to the awesome and terrible power of tweets from left activists, writers, and podcasters.

Both arguments are wrong, but the first was closer to the truth than the second. The left’s influence on Democratic elites has indeed been extremely limited. This is less a consequence of any particular feature of the Sanders era—over many years, many different progressive candidates with many different political styles and orientations toward the party establishment have similarly failed to move it—than of elite hostility to the left and their policies, which they consider substantively bad, politically risky, or both.

And while elites and major candidates have shifted noticeably on several issues in recent years—the minimum wage, healthcare, climate, and so on—those shifts, which are unlikely to make their way into federal legislation, are probably best understood as the product of specific conditions. First, a remarkable decade in organizing spurred in part by a massive financial crisis helped a left-wing candidate turn in a surprisingly strong performance in the 2016 Democratic primary. And second, Clinton’s narrow loss led to a wide-open primary this year in which multiple candidates made self-interested efforts to appeal to the constituency that Sanders revealed and activated. The period from the launch of his first campaign in April 2015 to his concession this past April was an unusual half-decade in American politics, and a window of opportunity for the left that has now closed. Another will not open for another eight years at an absolute minimum. Yes, a left-wing candidate might mount a challenge to Biden or Kamala Harris in 2024. But it is almost certain that they will lose, as incumbent challengers in the modern primary system always have.

[. . .]

So much, then, for voice. But what about exit? The structural barriers that would limit the viability of another alternative left-wing party in the United States have been written about extensively elsewhere and won’t be repeated here. That said, it seems fairly clear at this point that the left should, somehow, put itself at a more meaningful remove from the Democratic Party—that it should abandon the notion it might significantly move Democratic elites from below, and instead build out a detached movement adjacent to the Democratic Party that might interact with it only when it makes strategic sense to do so. Democratic socialists refer to this as an “inside-outside” strategy; frankly the inside portion of the term should probably be dropped. After all, a party that’s unwilling to turn over the reins even to younger moderates ideologically aligned with leadership isn’t ripe for further ideological transformation on a timescale adequate to meeting the crises the country faces, including, obviously, climate change.


Meanwhile, over at THE NATION, Jonathan Smucker is insisting the answer is not to abandon the party but to take it over.  Smuchker?  Schmucker?  At any rate, the scmuck seems to think he's just invented the wheel when the idea he's advocating is the same idea that's been repeatedly advocated.  The student left of the sixties?  Remember when they were going to take over and change everything.  That never happened.  It never happens so maybe schmucky can tell us in his following column exactly how the latest attempt will end any differently?


Maybe he can ponder that during all the time THE NATION takes off from covering Iraq?  The Iraq War continues.   The violence continues.  It's just the press coverage that ceased.  


We'll note this Tweet:

Dhi Qar: The activists of the October Revolution are preparing to stage large demonstrations next Friday; In response to the attacks targeting them by (Muqtada al-Sadr) militias.
Image


The November 30th snapshot detailed the assault Moqtada al-Sadr organized and implemented against the peaceful protesters in Nassariya.   He set his cult loose on them and they killed and wounded many.  Some reports have put the dead at 18 and over eighty were left injured.  Where is the coverage?


Joel Wing notes:



Was coverage of the initial attack but nothing afterward Associated Press, “Demonstrators in Iraq take to street unmasked amid pandemic,” 11/27/20 Reuters, “Three killed in Iraq as Shia cleric Moqtada al-Sadr’s followers stormed protest camp,” 11/27/20


Louisa Loveluck weighs in with this Tweet:


Just for the record - AFP, Reuters, AP and Al Jazeera did quick and sterling work on this. Others too I believe, but this is off the top of my head.


No, Louisa, they didn't.  REUTERS and AP were first out of the gate with their stories filed on Saturday.  REUTERS offered a bit stronger story than AP.  AFP followed.  ALJAZEERA waited two days to file and largely just picked through the reporting of AP, REUTERS and AFP.  They do have reporters on the ground in Iraq, ALJAZEERA does.  Is there a reason that they didn't have a truly original report? Is there a reason that it took them so many days to compile?


Is there a reason that Louisa ignores ARAB WEEKLY's coverage?


More to the point, Louisa, you work for who?  THE WASHINGTON POST?  Don't you find it strange that there's no story from THE POST?  Especially since you're the one who should be writing it for the paper? 


Does it get more feather brained than that?  A question is rightly raised about the lack of coverage in the western press and Louisa, the Iraq reporter for THE WASHINGTON POST, rushes in to say, "Hey, other outlets covered it!"  


The following sites updated: