At the United Nations General Assembly it was stated by Obama: “The future must not belong to those who slander the prophet of Islam”. Is English the native language of Barack Obama. Does Barack Obama understand the meaning of “slander”?
“Slander” is “defamation; calumny: rumors full of slander, a malicious, false, and defamatory statement or report: a slander against his good name.” Someone who does not believe Mohammad to be “The Prophet” and all that goes with that is conceivably “slandering” Mohammad. Is Obama saying that we all have to convert to Islam and that the “the future most not belong to those” who do not believe Mohammad to be what/who believers in Islam believe him to be?
Something that make us smile is Mitt Romney moving in the needed direction. On Libya Mitt Romney has to build the narrative of the disasters Obama has spawned. Mitt Romney is getting there although we want a lot more of this = Romney on Libya: Why doesn’t Obama want the American people to know what happened?
“He doesn’t use the phrase “cover up” — but Ryan does, in saying that it’s up to Americans to decide why The One is reluctant to use the word “terrorism” to describe what happened in Benghazi even though some of his underlings aren’t. And yes, this talking point is officially part of the Romney/Ryan message on the trail today. CNN asked the same question that Carl Cameron did and got a similar answer:A long time ago we wrote that Obama was not qualified to be president. It’s gotten much worse now. The views he is acting on are dangerous and add up to appeasement if not outright collaboration. Barack Obama’s focus on the “video” as a source of agitation is absolutely incorrect. The problem is the hatred of “freedom” that Islamist terrorists espouse.
When pressed on whether he stood by the attack, Romney said, “I’m not sure which developments in the Middle East he would consider bumps in the road.”
He then suggested the Obama administration was trying to hide the truth behind what really happened in Benghazi.
“The White House’s failure to acknowledge that – that the assassination of our ambassador was a terrorist attack, a terrorist event – suggests that they are trying to paper over the seriousness of what’s happening in the Middle East,” Romney told CNN.
Cameron actually gives Mitt an opportunity to go for the throat at 3:15 by asking whether he thinks Obama’s “bumps in the road” comment is a case of him misunderstanding the Middle East or a knowing attempt to minimize what’s happened there this month to cover his own ass. Romney’s answer: It’s proof that Obama misunderstands. Not sure I’d have gone the same route but that fits, at least, with the thrust of Mitt’s message that O’s in over his head on all things presidential. More of this, please — while bearing in mind Ace’s point that the economy is still the silver bullet here.”
And, as a Christian and a citizen in a democracy, I take offense to the slander comment. I'm not asking anyone to stop making jokes about Jesus Christ, or stop drawing him or anything. Do what you want. And that's the standard that should be applied across the board.
For Barack to be such a little bitch ass? I'm disgusted with him.
I am disgusted with him and someone needs to tell him to learn to shut up. His speech was wrong in terms of facts, in terms of tone and so much more. Most of all, it was wrong in going on and on and on. No one needs all that. Seriously, learn to shut up. I'm not joking. Less can be more.
So bit by bit, we learn that Barack's not up for the job and we can't trust him.
That's what lying about the attack in Libya told us. This is Michael Graham (Boston Herald):
A week after U.S. Ambassador to Libya Chris Stevens was killed in an attack on the consulate in Benghazi, President Barack Obama sent U.N. Ambassador Susan Rice out to tell us, “What happened initially was that it was a spontaneous reaction . . . as a consequence of the video, that people gathered outside the embassy and then it grew very violent.”
Actually, Mr. President . . . no. There was no “spontaneous reaction.” It was a terrorist attack, and nothing but a terrorist attack.
For two weeks, Obama’s spokesman told us that this deadly attack was just a movie review gone wrong. As Jay Carney said on Sept. 18, “We saw no evidence to back up claims by others that this was a preplanned or premeditated attack.”
What a lying administration. There's really nothing Barack won't do to prove he's even worse than Bush.
Going out with C.I.'s "Iraq snapshot:"